Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:20:44.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cell contamination and branching processes in a random environment with immigration

Part of: Markov processes Special processes Physiological, cellular and medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Vincent Bansaye
Vincent Bansaye*
Affiliation:
Université Pierre et Marie Curie et CNRS
*
∗ Current address: CMAP, École Polytechnique, Route de Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France. Email address: vincent.bansaye@polytechnique.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider a branching model for a population of dividing cells infected by parasites. Each cell receives parasites by inheritance from its mother cell and independent contamination from outside the cell population. Parasites multiply randomly inside the cell and are shared randomly between the two daughter cells when the cell divides. The law governing the number of parasites which contaminate a given cell depends only on whether the cell is already infected or not. We first determine the asymptotic behavior of branching processes in a random environment with state-dependent immigration, which gives the convergence in distribution of the number of parasites in a cell line. We then derive a law of large numbers for the asymptotic proportions of cells with a given number of parasites. The main tools are branching processes in a random environment and laws of large numbers for a Markov tree.

Keywords

Branching processes in a random environment with immigrationMarkov chain indexed by a treeempirical measurerenewal theorem

MSC classification

Primary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.) 60J85: Applications of branching processes 60K37: Processes in random environments 92C37: Cell biology 92D25: Population dynamics (general)
Secondary: 92D30: Epidemiology
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 1059 - 1081
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2009 

References

Asmussen, S. and Hering, H. (1983). Branching Processes (Progress Prob. Statist. 3), Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Athreya, K. B. and Karlin, S. (1971). Branching processes with random environments. II. Limit theorems. Ann. Math. Statist. 42, 1843–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreya, K. B. and Karlin, S. (1971). On branching processes with random environments. I. Extinction probabilities. Ann. Math. Statist. 42, 1499–1520.Google Scholar
Athreya, K. B. and Ney, P. E. (2004). Branching Processes. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.Google Scholar
Athreya, K. B. and Kang, H.-J. (1998). Some limit theorems for positive recurrent branching Markov chains. I. Adv. Appl. Prob. 30, 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreya, K. and Kang, H.-J. (1998). Some limit theorems for positive recurrent branching Markov chains. II. Adv. Appl. Prob. 30, 711–722.Google Scholar
Afanasyev, V. I., Geiger, J., Kersting, G. and Vatutin, V. A. (2005). Criticality for branching processes in a random environment. Ann. Prob. 33, 645–673.Google Scholar
Bansaye, V. (2008). Proliferating parasites in dividing cells: Kimmel's branching model revisited. Ann. Appl. Prob. 18, 967–996.Google Scholar
Benjamini, I. and Peres, Y. (1994). Markov chains indexed by trees. Ann. Prob. 22, 219–243.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1966). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Geiger, J., Kersting, G. and Vatutin, V. A. (2003). Limit theorems for subcritical branching processes in a random environment. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Prob. Statist. 39, 593–620.Google Scholar
Guyon, J. (2007). Limit theorems for bifurcating Markov chains. Application to the detection of cellular aging. Ann. Appl. Prob. 17, 1538–1569.Google Scholar
Key, E. S. (1987). Limiting distributions and regeneration times for multitype branching processes with immigration in a random environment. Ann. Prob. 15, 344–353.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. (1959). Unitary dilations of Markov transition operators, and the corresponding integral representations for transition-probability matrices. In Probability and Statistics: The Harald Cramér Volume, John Wiley, New York, pp. 139–161.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. (1997). Quasistationarity in a branching model of division-within-division. In Classical and Modern Branching Processes (Minneapolis, MN, 1994; IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 84), Springer, New York, pp. 157–164.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M. V. (1976). The asymptotic behavior of the probability of non-extinction of critical branching processes in a random environment. Theory Prob. Appl. 21, 813–825.Google Scholar
Lyons, R. and Peres, Y. (2005). Probability on Trees and Networks. Available at http://mypage.iu.edu/∼rdlyons/prbtree/prbtree.html.Google Scholar
Roitershtein, A. (2007). A note on multitype branching processes with immigration in a random environment. Ann. Prob. 35, 1573–1592.Google Scholar
Smith, W. L. and Wilkinson, W. E. (1969). On branching processes in random environments. Ann. Math. Statist. 40, 814–827.Google Scholar
Stewart, E. J., Madden, R., Paul, G. and Taddei, F. (2005). Aging and death in an organism that reproduces by morphologically symmetric division. PLoS Biol. 3, e45.Google Scholar