Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:13:18.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The µc-rule is not optimal in the second node of the tandem queue: a counterexample

Part of: Operations research and management science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Arie Hordijk  and
Ger Koole
Arie Hordijk*
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
Ger Koole*
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
*
∗Postal address for both authors: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Leiden, P.O. Box 9512, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
∗Postal address for both authors: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Leiden, P.O. Box 9512, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this note we give a counterexample which shows that the µc-rule is not optimal in the second node of the tandem queue. This counterexample contradicts the interchange argument in Nain [1] and Nain et al. [2].

Keywords

STOCHASTIC SCHEDULING

MSC classification

Primary: 90B25: Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection
Secondary: 90C40: Markov and semi-Markov decision processes
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 234 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1992 

References

[1] Nain, P. (1989) Interchange arguments for classical scheduling problems in queues. Syst. Control Lett. 12, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Nain, P., Tsoucas, P. and Walrand, J. (1989) Interchange arguments in stochastic scheduling. J. Appl. Prob. 27, 815–826.Google Scholar