Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:28:29.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Joint Densities of First Hitting Times of a Diffusion Process Through Two Time-Dependent Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2016

Laura Sacerdote*
Affiliation:
University of Torino
Ottavia Telve*
Affiliation:
University of Torino
Cristina Zucca*
Affiliation:
University of Torino
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics ‘G. Peano’, University of Torino, Via Carlo Alberto 10, 10123 Torino, Italy.
Postal address: Department of Mathematics ‘G. Peano’, University of Torino, Via Carlo Alberto 10, 10123 Torino, Italy.
Postal address: Department of Mathematics ‘G. Peano’, University of Torino, Via Carlo Alberto 10, 10123 Torino, Italy.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider a one-dimensional diffusion process on the diffusion interval I originated in x0I. Let a(t) and b(t) be two continuous functions of t, t > t0, with bounded derivatives, a(t) < b(t), and a(t), b(t) ∈ I, for all t > t0. We study the joint distribution of the two random variables Ta and Tb, the first hitting times of the diffusion process through the two boundaries a(t) and b(t), respectively. We express the joint distribution of Ta and Tb in terms of ℙ(Ta < t, Ta < Tb) and ℙ(Tb < t, Ta > Tb), and we determine a system of integral equations verified by these last probabilities. We propose a numerical algorithm to solve this system and we prove its convergence properties. Examples and modeling motivation for this study are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Abate, J. and Whitt, W. (1995). Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms of probability distributions. ORSA J. Comput. 7, 3643.Google Scholar
Albano, G. and Giorno, V. (2006). A stochastic model in tumor growth. J. Theoret. Biol. 242, 329336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alili, L., Patie, P. and Pedersen, J. L. (2005). Representations of the first hitting time density of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Stoch. Models 21, 967980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, E., Sacerdote, L. and Zucca, C. (2013). A first passage problem for a bivariate diffusion process: numerical solution with an application to neuroscience when the process is Gauss-Markov. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 242, 4152.Google Scholar
Borodin, A. N. and Salminen, P. (2002). Handbook of Brownian Motion—Facts and Formulae, 2nd edn. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
Buonocore, A., Nobile, A. G. and Ricciardi, L. M. (1987). A new integral equation for the evaluation of first-passage-time probability densities. Adv. Appl. Prob. 19, 784800.Google Scholar
Buonocore, A., Giorno, V., Nobile, A. G. and Ricciardi, L. M. (1990). On the two-boundary first-crossing-time problem for diffusion processes. J. Appl. Prob. 27, 102114.Google Scholar
Capocelli, R. M. and Ricciardi, L. M. (1976). On the transformation of diffusion processes into the Feller process. Math. Biosci. 29, 219234.Google Scholar
Davydov, D. and Linetsky, V. (2003). Pricing options on scalar diffusions: an eigenfunction expansion approach. Operat. Res. 51, 185209.Google Scholar
Di Crescenzo, A. G., Giorno, V., Nobile, A. G. and Ricciardi, L. M. (1995). On a symmetry-based constructive approach to probability densities for two-dimensional diffusion processes. J. Appl. Prob. 32, 316336.Google Scholar
Galleani, L., Sacerdote, L., Tavella, P. and Zucca, C. (2003). A mathematical model for the atomic clock error. Metrologia 40, S257S264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorno, V., Nobile, A. G. and Ricciardi, L. M. (2011). On the densities of certain bounded diffusion processes. Ric. Mat. 60, 89124.Google Scholar
Giorno, V., Nobile, A. G., Ricciardi, L. M. and Sacerdote, L. (1986). Some remarks on the Rayleigh process. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 398408.Google Scholar
Giraudo, M. T. and Sacerdote, L. (1999). An improved technique for the simulation of first passage times for diffusion processes. Commun. Statist. Simul. Comput. 28, 11351163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, M. T., Sacerdote, L. and Zucca, C. (2001). A Monte Carlo method for the simulation of first passage times of diffusion processes. Meth. Comp. Appl. Prob. 3, 215231.Google Scholar
Itô, K. and McKean, H. P. Jr. (1974). Diffusion Processes and Their Sample Paths. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lapidus, L. and Pinder, G. F. (1999). Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Science and Engineering. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Linetsky, V. (2004). Computing hitting time densities for CIR and OU diffusions: applications to mean-reverting models. J. Comput. Finance 7, 122.Google Scholar
Linz, P. (1985). Analytical and Numerical Methods for Volterra Equations (SIAM Studies Appl. Math. 7). SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Nelsen, R. B. (1999). An Introduction to Copulas (Lecture Notes Statist. 139). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Novikov, A., Frishling, V. and Kordzakhia, N. (1999). Approximations of boundary crossing probabilities for a Brownian motion. J. Appl. Prob. 36, 10191030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsingher, E. and Beghin, L. (2006). Probabilità e Modelli Aleatori. Aracne, Roma.Google Scholar
Panfilo, G., Tavella, P. and Zucca, C. (2004). How long does a clock error remain inside two threshold barriers? An evaluation by means of stochastic processes. In Proc. Europ. Freq. Time Forum, Guilford, pp. 110115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskir, G. (2002). Limit at zero of the Brownian first-passage density. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 124, 100111.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, L. M. (1976). On the transformation of diffusion processes into the Wiener process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 54, 185199.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, L. M. (1977). Diffusion Processes and Related Topics in Biology (Lecture Notes Biomath. 14). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, L. M. and Sacerdote, L. (1987). On the probability densities of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with a reflecting boundary. J. Appl. Prob. 24, 355369.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, L. M. and Sato, S. (1990). Diffusion processes and first-passage-time problems. In Lectures in Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Manchester University Press, pp. 206285.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, L. M., Sacerdote, L. and Sato, S. (1984). On an integral equation for first-passage-time probability densities. J. Appl. Prob. 21, 302314.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, L. M., Di Crescenzo, A., Giorno, V. and Nobile, A. G. (1999). An outline of theoretical and algorithmic approaches to first passage time problems with applications to biological modeling. Math. Japon. 50, 247322.Google Scholar
Sacerdote, L. and Giraudo, M. T. (2013). Stochastic integrate and fire models: a review on mathematical methods and their applications. In Stochastic Biomathematical Models (Lecture Notes Math. 2058), pp. 99148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. D. (1978). Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations. Finite Difference Methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: a foundational primer. J. Math. Psych. 44, 408463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Loan, C. (1992). Computational Frameworks for the Fast Fourier Transform. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Zucca, C. and Sacerdote, L. (2009). On the inverse first-passage-time problem for a Wiener process. Ann. Appl. Prob. 19, 13191346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar