Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T20:47:37.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the variance mean ratio in models of parasite distributions

Part of: Markov processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

Andrew D. Barbour  and
Andrea Pugliese
Andrew D. Barbour*
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Andrea Pugliese*
Affiliation:
Università di Trento
*
∗ Postal address: Abteilung Angewandte Mathematik, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Email address: adb@amath.unizh.ch
∗∗ Postal address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Trento, Via Sommarive 14, 38050 Povo (TN), Italy. Email address: pugliese@science.unitn.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the variance-to-mean ratio of the distributions of parasites among hosts for some models of parasite infection, using the cohort approach. We consider a model with density dependence in parasite mortality, and two different formulations of disease induced host mortality. We show that the distributions of parasites, conditional on host survival, converge to quasi-stationary distributions as host age increases. When there is density dependence in parasite mortality, the limiting variance-to-mean ratio is less than 1 (an ‘under-dispersed’ distribution). In contrast, the two modes of disease induced host mortality show that either over- or underdispersed distributions may result.

Keywords

Quasi-stationary distributionsmodels of parasitic infectionsover-dispersed distributionsvariance-to-mean ratio

MSC classification

Primary: 60J27: Continuous-time Markov processes on discrete state spaces 92D30: Epidemiology

Information

Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 701 - 719
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Anderson, R. M. and Gordon, D. M. (1982). Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities. Parasitology 85, 373–398.Google Scholar
[2] Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. (1991). Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[3] Bailey, N. T. J. (1964). The Elements of Stochastic Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[4] Berman, A. and Plemmons, R. (1979). Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[5] Bliss, C. I. and Fisher, R. A. (1953). Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data and a note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9, 176–200.Google Scholar
[6] Brown, T. C., Hamza, K. and Xia, A. (1998). On the variance to mean ratio for random variables from markov chains and point processes. J. Appl. Prob. 35, 303–312.Google Scholar
[7] Chan, M. and Isham, V. (1998). A stochastic model of schistosomiasis immuno-epidemiology. Math. Biosci. 151, 179–198.Google Scholar
[8] Chung, K. (1967). Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[9] Grenfell, B. T., Wilson, K., Isham, V. S., Boyd, H. E. G. and Dietz, K. (1995). Modelling patterns of parasite aggregation in natural populations. Parasitology 111S, 135–151.Google Scholar
[10] Herbert, J. and Isham, V. (2000). On stochastic host-parasite interaction models. J. Math. Biol. 40, 343–371.Google Scholar
[11] Hudson, P. J. and Dobson, A. P. (1995). Macroparasites: observed patterns in naturally fluctuating animal populations. In Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations, eds Grenfell, B. T. and Dobson, A. P.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–178.Google Scholar
[12] Isham, V. (1995). Stochastic models of host-macroparasite interaction. Ann. Appl. Prob. 5, 720–740.Google Scholar
[13] Lefebvre, C. and Picard, P. (1993). An unusual stochastic order relation with some applications in sampling and epidemic theory. Adv. Appl. Prob. 25, 63–81.Google Scholar
[14] Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[15] Pacala, S. W. and Dobson, A. P. (1988). The relation between the number of parasite/host and host age: population dynamic causes and maximum likelihood estimation. Parasitology 96, 197–210.Google Scholar
[16] Pielou, E. C. (1977). Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[17] Pollett, P. and Roberts, G. (1990). A description of long-term behaviour of absorbing continuous-time markov chains using a centre manifold. Adv. Appl. Prob. 22, 111–128.Google Scholar
[18] Quinnell, R., Grafen, A. and Woolhouse, M. (1995). Changes in parasite aggregation with age: a discrete infection model. Parasitology 111, 635–644.Google Scholar
[19] Seneta, E. (1966). Quasi-stationary behaviour in the random walk with continuous time. Austral. J. Statist. 8, 92–98.Google Scholar
[20] Shaw, D. J. and Dobson, A. P. (1995). Patterns of macroparsite abundance and aggregation in wildlife populations: a quantitative review. Parasitology 111 Suppl., 111–133.Google Scholar
[21] Stoyan, D. (1983). Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[22] Tallis, G. M. and Leyton, M. (1966). A stochastic approach to the study of parasite populations. J. Theoret. Biol. 13, 251–260.Google Scholar
[23] Tallis, G. M. and Leyton, M. (1969). Stochastic models of populations of helminthic parasites in the definitive host, i. Math. Biosci. 4, 39–48.Google Scholar
[24] Van Doorn, E. (1991). Quasi-stationary distributions and convergence to quasi-stationarity of birth-death processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 23, 683–700.Google Scholar
[25] Vere-Jones, D. (1969). Some limit theorems for evanescent processes. Austral. J. Statist. 11, 67–78.Google Scholar