Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:53:06.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expert evidence and the courts 2. Proposals for reform, expert witness bodies and ‘the model report’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Keith J. B. Rix
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In response to what are regarded as the two principal evils of the civil justice system, costs and delay, Lord Woolf, now Master of the Rolls, has presided over an inquiry which has resulted in some proposed reforms which should change radically the administration of civil justice. The implications for experts are best considered against the background of a brief overview of the proposed reforms. This paper then considers the role of the expert witness organisations and the medical version of ‘the model expert report’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , March 1999 , pp. 154 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 1999 

References

Academy of Experts (1992) Members Handbook: Guidance Notes for Experts. London: Academy of Experts.Google Scholar
Rix, K. J. B. (1999) Expert evidence and the courts: 1. The history of expert evidence. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 5, 71–77.Google Scholar
Torr, J. (1998) The model form of medical expert's report. The Expert, Autumn, 24.Google Scholar
Woolf, H. K. (1996) Access to Justice. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Clough v. Tameside & Glossop Health Authority (1998) Lloyd's Rep Med, 69.Google Scholar
National Justice Compania Naviera SA v. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd “Ikarian Reefer” (1993) 37 EG, 158.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.