Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:35:29.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seeing the evidence: learning from images in neuroscience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The cover of this issue heralds a series of articles in which a visual image derived from cell biology or neuroscience is used to promote understanding of the biological mechanisms fundamental to psychiatry. ‘Images in neuroscience’ are intended to demonstrate the structures and mechanisms of the basic building blocks of brain function, including ionotropic and metabotropic receptors, second messenger systems, specialised ion channels, transmitter pathways, transporters, neuroglial function, and the complex mechanisms within cells that are being revealed, as new genetic associations for mental illness are discovered.

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010 

The idea that a visual image can convey a complex biological meaning is most iconically seen in the double helix of DNA proposed by Watson & Crick in 1953. Crick's wife, the artist Odile Crick, drew the image for their Nature article. The strength of that image is that as well as providing a chemical structure accounting for the known pairing of nucleotide bases, it also revealed a mechanism for genetic replication and suggested a mechanism, later elaborated by Crick, for signalling the assembly of proteins (Reference WatsonWatson 1968).

In addition to the double helix, other discoveries of the early 1950s were crucial in helping us to understand the brain. In 1950, chlorpromazine was synthesised by Paul Charpentier in the laboratories of Rhône-Poulenc, as part of the development of antihistamines; it was tested in patients in 1951 and became available for prescription as the first antipsychotic in 1952 (Reference ShorterShorter 1997). Alan Hodgkin & Andrew Huxley proposed mechanisms of neuronal excitability and conduction, implying the existence of membrane channels for specific ions regulated by voltage changes across the membrane (Reference Hodgkin and HuxleyHodgkin 1952). Paul Fatt & Bernard Katz elucidated the quantal mechanism of synaptic transmission, implying vesicular storage and release of acetylcholine (Reference Fatt and KatzFatt 1952). In 1957, Julius Axelrod discovered that noradrenaline released into a synapse is taken back into the presynaptic nerve ending by a reuptake mechanism, thus identifying one of the ‘transporters’ that provide a basis for understanding antidepressants (Reference Whitby, Axelrod and Weil-MalherbeWhitby 1961). The roles of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (Reference HayashiHayashi 1952; Reference Curtis, Phillis and WatkinsCurtis 1960) as transmitters were also established.

Thus, by the end of the 1950s, there were strong theoretical models of voltage-sensitive ion channels, of chemical transmission across synapses by acetylcholine, and of reuptake transporters and membrane ‘receptors’ that obeyed laws of activation and competitive antagonism, similar to those for enzymes that were known to be protein structures. Antipsychotics and antidepressants had become available, and GABA, glutamate and noradrenaline were also recognised as transmitters.

What were then abstract models have been elucidated and given form by the techniques of cell biology, pharmacology and molecular genetics. The theoretical ‘models’ now have a physical reality that can be visualised either directly or graphically. Dopamine and serotonin have also been established as important neurotransmitters.

Long-term potentiation and the cellular basis of memory

When Eric Kandel received the Nobel Prize in 2000, it acknowledged decades of work on the biological basis of memory formation. The image on the front cover of this issue of Advances and reproduce in black and white in Fig. 1 summarises some of his achievements, a model for the cellular basis of declarative or explicit memory, underlying the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus.

In his book In Search of Memory, Reference KandelKandel (2006) recalls the lifetime experiences that stimulated his curiosity into why some exciting events are vividly remembered and why some distressing events can never be forgotten. He describes his childhood in pre-war Vienna, his education as a Jewish émigré in the USA, his training in medicine and psychiatry (predominantly psychoanalytical) and his discoveries through a series of extraordinary collaborations with leading neuroscientists.

His search was guided by the principle elaborated by Donald Reference HebbHebb (1949) that when neurons repeatedly discharge together, the connections between them become more extensive, providing a basis for memory. His early work on the giant sea snail Aplysia provided a model for the associative form of implicit memory (Reference Kandel and TaucKandel 1965), corresponding in humans to fear conditioning involving the amygdala, and operant conditioning involving the striatum and cerebellum.

Transmitting memory into shape

As a result of studies of patients with bilateral removal of the medial temporal lobes, it was known that the hippocampus is important in processing information for storage as declarative or explicit memory (Reference Scoville and MilnerScoville 1957). In 1973, Bliss & Lomo described the phenomenon of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus, whereby intense repetitive stimulation of axons synapsing onto pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus causes an increase in the response of those pyramidal cells to subsequent stimulation. Long-term potentiation is the most enduring change in neuronal function known in neuroscience and may provide a cellular basis for the formation of declarative memory.

Figure 1 illustrates a crucial aspect of this model, a change in synaptic strength when the cell detects the coincidence of two separate inputs. The CA1 region of the hippocampus brings together multisensory information for memory formation, for example memory about places. The CA1 cells of the hippocampus receive an input from the excitatory transmitter glutamate released by collateral fibres of the CA3 pyramidal neurons. For long-term potentiation to occur, two types of glutamate receptor are involved. The α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor is a gated sodium channel whose activation by glutamate allows sodium entry, depolarising the adjacent cell membrane. N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA)-type glutamate receptors are normally insensitive to glutamate because they are blocked by a magnesium ion. However, depolarisation of the membrane displaces the magnesium ion, and the NMDA-type receptor can then be activated by glutamate. In this sense, the NMDA receptor detects the coincidence of recent depolarisation and the presence of glutamate.

N-methyl-d-asparatic acid receptors are also gated ion channels, but are more complex than AMPA receptors and permit the passage of both sodium and calcium ions. Calcium ions entering the cell act as second messengers, activating various intracellular processes: these processes bring about changes in the function and structure of the synapse, leading by several mechanisms to long-term potentiation.

The main pathway illustrated leads to the formation of new AMPA receptors. Binding calcium with calmodulin to activate calcium–calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK), which phosphorylates preformed AMPA receptors, causes other AMPA receptors to become located in the membrane (Reference Malenka and NicollMalenka 1999; Reference Miles, Poncer and FrickerMiles 2005) and others to be synthesised.

The early phase of long-term potentiation involves enhanced sensitivity of receptors to glutamate as well as enhanced release of the transmitter. Nitric oxide may act as a signal to the presynaptic nerve ending to release more transmitters. Postsynaptically, local receptors are trafficked to the membrane. In the later phase of long-term potentiation, signals translate to the nucleus of the cell and lead to protein synthesis and to structural changes, i.e. the formation of new synapses. This involves the stimulation by calcium ions of adenylate cyclase, forming cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which activates cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) and, together with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), leads to the production of cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB), which acts within the nucleus to trigger genes, leading to the production of growth factors.

In its simplest form, the coincidence that is detected is that of recent depolarisation (by glutamate released from one presynaptic pathway) with glutamate release onto NMDA receptors from another presynaptic neuron. However, the model also permits the detection of other coincident inputs. For example, the adenylate cyclase can also be activated by other transmitters such as serotonin in Aplysia and by dopamine in the mammalian brain, and Kandel suggests that in this role dopamine signals the salience of the initial input.

Our understanding of long-term potentiation and the molecular basis of memory is still developing. Reference Si, Lindquist and KandelSi et al (2003) identified a protein cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein (CPEB) that enables the signal from the nucleus to activate local protein synthesis; CPEB has some structural similarities and self-replicating properties in common with prions. Reference Kovacs, Steullet and SteinmannKovacs et al (2007) identified a molecule called transducer of regulated CREB activity 1 (TORC1) that senses the coincidence of cAMP and calcium ions in neurons, and leads to the synthesis of factors enhancing synaptic transmission. Reference Cao, Wang and MeiCao et al (2008) used pharmacological inhibition to turn off CaMK in a mouse genetically engineered to overexpress this molecule, and were able to selectively remove specific memories.

Generalisability and clinical implications

The phenomenon of long-term potentiation has been found in other brain areas besides the hippocampus, and may have wide clinical implications.

Understanding the mechanisms of long-term potentiation offers hope of developing interventions to treat disorders of memory and learning, including phobias, obsessive–compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (Reference Morrison, Allardyce and McKaneMorrison 2002). The role of dopamine in long-term potentiation is relevant to symptom formation (e.g. delusions) in psychosis. The cellular mechanisms involved in long-term potentiation have also been implicated in hypotheses about the pathophysiology of depression (see Reference Zaman and ZamanZaman 2001). The role of CPEB may caste light on the pathogenesis of prion diseases.

Conclusions

Evolution was a controversial idea as an explanation for the variety of species, and became a serious contender only after Reference DarwinDarwin (1859) had proposed natural selection as the mechanism by which it might occur. In this sense, the mechanism becomes a part of the evidence. When the mechanism can be captured as an image, the evidence is even more compelling. Understanding the cellular mechanisms by which the brain operates will empower the psychiatrist of the future. We hope that the images that will appear in Advances in the ‘Images in neuroscience’ series will facilitate that understanding.

Eric Kandel is only the second trained psychiatrist to win a Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine; the first and the only practising clinician was Julius Wagner-Jauregg in 1927 for fever therapy in general paresis (Reference Howes, Khambhaita and Fusar-PoliHowes 2009). It is fitting that Kandel's work on memory formation should provide the opening image for this series.

FIG 1 Kandel's model for the cellular and molecular basis of declarative memory formation in the hippocampus (see Reference Kandel, Schwartz and JessellKandel 2000). Artist: Philip Wilson.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest

None.

References

Bliss, TVP, Lomo, TJ (1973) Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant pathway. Journal of Physiology 232: 331–56.Google Scholar
Cao, X, Wang, H, Mei, B et al (2008) Inducible and selective erasure of memories in the mouse brain via chemical-genetic manipulation. Neuron 60: 353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, DR, Phillis, JW, Watkins, JC (1960) The chemical excitation of spinal neurones by certain acidic amino acids. Journal of Physiology 150: 656–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1st edn). John Murray.Google Scholar
Fatt, P, Katz, B (1952) Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. Journal of Physiology 117: 109–28.Google Scholar
Hayashi, T (1952) A physiological study of epileptic seizures following cortical stimulation in animals and its application to human clinics. Japanese Journal of Physiology 3: 4664.Google Scholar
Hebb, DO (1949) The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, AL, Huxley, AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology 117: 500–44.Google Scholar
Howes, OD, Khambhaita, A, Fusar-Poli, P (2009) Images in psychiatry: Julius Wagner-Jauregg, 1857-1940. American Journal of Psychiatry 166: 409.Google Scholar
Kandel, E, Tauc, L (1965) Heterosynaptic facilitation inn neurones of the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia depilans. Journal of Physiology 181: 127.Google Scholar
Kandel, ER, Schwartz, JH, Jessell, TM (2000) Principles of Neural Science (4th edn). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kandel, ER (2006) In Search of Memory: The Emergence of a New Science of Mind. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Kovacs, KA, Steullet, P, Steinmann, M et al (2007) TORC1 is a calcium- and cAMP-sensitive coincidence detector involved in hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104: 4700–5.Google Scholar
Malenka, RC, Nicoll, RA (1999) Long-term potentiation – a decade of progress? Science 285: 1870–4.Google Scholar
Miles, R, Poncer, J-C, Fricker, D et al (2005) The birth (and adolescence) of LTP. Journal of Physiology 568: 12.Google Scholar
Morrison, PD, Allardyce, J, McKane, JP (2002) Fear knot. Neurobiological disruption of long-term fear memory. British Journal of Psychiatry 180: 195–7.Google Scholar
Scoville, WB, Milner, B (1957) Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 20: 1121.Google Scholar
Shorter, E (1997) A History of Psychiatry: From the Age of the Asylum to the Era of Prozac. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Si, K, Lindquist, S, Kandel, ER (2003) A neuronal isoform of the Aplysia CPEB has prion-like properties. Cell 115: 893904.Google Scholar
Watson, JD, Crick, FHC (1953) Molecular structure of nucleic acids. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171: 737–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, JD (1968) The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. Atheneum.Google Scholar
Whitby, LG, Axelrod, J, Weil-Malherbe, H (1961) The fate of norepinephrine-H3 in animals. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy 132: 193201.Google Scholar
Zaman, SH, Zaman, R (2001) Long-term potentiation and changes seen in depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 179: 559–60.Google Scholar
Figure 0

FIG 1 Kandel's model for the cellular and molecular basis of declarative memory formation in the hippocampus (see Kandel 2000). Artist: Philip Wilson.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.