Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:10:34.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applications of Room Temperature Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry Using a Mercuric Iodide Detector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

D.E. Leyden ,
A.R. Harding  and
K. Goldbach
D.E. Leyden
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
A.R. Harding
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
K. Goldbach
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
Get access

Extract

Energy dispensive X-ray spectrometry has been used extensively for the rapid, simultaneous deterninaion of elements in a variety of sample types. Excitation of the analytical sample can be by either X-ray tube, secondary targets, or radioactive isotopic sources. Tube sources have the advantages of convenient control of the excitation conditions, whereas an isotopic source or secondary target must be physically replaced by another to affect an excitation change. The use of primary filters between the sample and X-ray tube can greatly enhance the flexibilitty of the excitation conditions.

Type
IX. Other XRF Applications
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 27: Thirty-Second Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 1-5, 1983 , 1983 , pp. 527 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Drummond, W.E.; Stewart, W.D., “Automated Energy-Dispersive Fluorescence Analysis,” American Laboratory, November 1980, p 71.Google Scholar
2. Bertin, E.P., Introduction to X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis, Plenum, NY, 1978, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
3. Bertin, E.P., Introductio to X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis, Plenum, NY, 1978, Chapter 6.Google Scholar
4. Hunth, G.C.; Dabrowski, A.J.; Singh, M.; Economou, T.E.; Turkevich, A.L., Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 22, 461, (1979).Google Scholar
5. Bertin, E.P., Introduction to X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis, Plenum, NY, 1978, Chapter 10.Google Scholar
6. Kinson, K.; Belcher, C.B., Anal. Chim. Acta, 30, 64, (1964).Google Scholar
7. Rasberry, S.D., Heinrich, K.E.J., Anal Chem., 46, 81, (1974).Google Scholar
9. Ellis, A.T., Leyden, D.E., Wegscheider, W., Jablonski, B.B., and Bodnar, W.B., “Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Trace Elements in Water Using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. Part I-Response Characteristics,” Anal. Chim. Acta, 142, 73–87, (1982).Google Scholar
10. Ellis, A.T., Leyden, D.E., Wegscheider, W. Jablonski, B.B., and Bodnar, W.B., “Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Trace Elements in Water Using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. Part II-Interference Studies,” Anal. Chim. Acta. 142, 89–100, (1982). Interference Studies,” Anal. Chim. Acta, 142, 89-100.Google Scholar
11. Singh, M., Nuclear Inst. and Methods, 193, 135, (1982).Google Scholar
12. Sigma Coatings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Personal Communication, 1982.Google Scholar