Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:18:26.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fourier Transformation of X-Ray Rocking Curves from Interferometer Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

J. M. Hudson
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Durham University, South Road, Durham, U.K.
B. K. Tanner
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Durham University, South Road, Durham, U.K.
R. Blunt
Affiliation:
Epitaxial Products International, Cypress Drive, St. Mellons Cardiff, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

We discuss the use of Fourier transform techniques to extract layer thickness from the interference fringes observed in high resolution X-ray diffraction rocking curves of pseudomorphic HEMT structures. The interference structure is extracted by cubic spline fitting to the extrema of the data, thereby obtaining a background envelope which is used to normalise the data. The resulting constant background is subtracted from the data and the residual Fourier transformed. Auto correlation of the residual significantly improves the result from noisy data. Satisfactory results are obtained only when the Bragg peak from the substrate is windowed out. With a limited dynamic and angular range, there is often insufficient data to separate the two closely spaced periods arising from the total layer thickness and that excluding the quantum well. The result then corresponds to the average of these two thicknesses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tapfer, L, Ospelt, M and von Kanel, H, J. Appl. Phys. 67:1298 (1990)Google Scholar
2. Green, G S, Tanner, B K, Barnett, S J, Emeny, M, Pitt, A D, Whitehouse, C R and Clark, G F, Phil. Mag. Letts. 62:131 (1990)Google Scholar
3. Holloway, H, J. Appl. Phys. 67:6229 (1990)Google Scholar
4. Macrander, A T, Lau, S, Stege, K & Chu, S N G, Appl. Phys. Letts. 52:1985 (1988)Google Scholar
5. Miles, S J, Ph.D. Thesis, Durham University, 1989 Google Scholar
6. Hudson, J.M., Ph.D. Thesis, Durham University, 1993 Google Scholar
7. Loxley, N, Bowen, D K & Tanner, B K, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 208:107 (1991)Google Scholar
8. Ramirez, R. W., The FFT: Fundamentals and Concepts, Prentice Hall, 3 985 Google Scholar