Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:46:57.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement Of Relative X-Ray Intensity Ratios for Elements With Z=14 to 92 Using EDXRF Spectrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Krassimir N. Stoev
Affiliation:
River Road Environmental Technology Centre 3439 River Road, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0H3
Joseph F. Dlouhy
Affiliation:
River Road Environmental Technology Centre 3439 River Road, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0H3
Get access

Extract

Nowadays x-ray fluorescence analysis is one of the major techniques for determination of trace elements. Vacuum operated Si (Li) .energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometers can analyze simultaneously up to 50 elements from Na (Z=11) to U (Z = 92) . Proper interpretation of the accumulated spectra requires correct solution of x-ray line overlap problems. In many cases knowledge of x-ray intensity ratios can make the procedure for resolving the overlapped peaks more reliable and reproducible. Measurements of radiative transition rates can also provide fundamental tests of theoretical atomic structure calculations. There are many other useful applications of x-ray emission rates in theoretical and experimental physics. On the other hand, there are differences in the published data, which suggests that x-ray intensity ratios are still not known with the necessary accuracy, and new measurements are useful and necessary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Manson, S.T. and Kennedy, D.J., “X-ray emission rates in the Hartree-Slater approximation”, Atomic Data & Nuclear Data. Tables 14:111 (1974)Google Scholar
2. Scofield, J.H., “Relativistic Hartree-Slater values for K and L x-ray emission rates”. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 14:121 (1974)Google Scholar
3. Scofield, J.H., “Exchange corrections of K x-ray emission rates”, Physical Review, A9:1041 (1974)Google Scholar
4. Mukoyama, T. and Kagawa, T., “Analytical calculation of relativistic radiative transition rates”, Physical Review, A29:1055 (1984)Google Scholar
5. Salem, S.I. and CW., Schultz, “L x-ray transition probabilities”, Atomic Data, 3:215 (1971)Google Scholar
6. Scofield, J.H., “Hartree-Fock values of L x-ray emission rates”, Physical Review, A10:1507 (1974)Google Scholar
7. Cohen, D. and Harrigan, M., “Calculated L-shell x-ray line intensities for proton and He-ion impact”, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tab., 34:393 (1986)Google Scholar
8. Bhalla, C.P., “Radiative transition probabilities for vacancies in M sub-shells”, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys, 3:916 (1970)Google Scholar
9. Mukoyama, T. and Adachi, H., “M-shell x-ray emission rates for rare earth elements”, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 53:984 (1984)Google Scholar
10. McGuire, E.J., “Atomic M-shell Coster-Kronig, Auger and radiative rates, and fluorescence yields for Ca-Th”, Physical Review, A5:1043 (1972)Google Scholar
11. Chen, M.H. and Crasemann, B., “M x-ray emission rates in Dirac-Fock approximation”, Physical Review, A30:170 (1984)Google Scholar
12. Hansen, J.S., Freund, H.V. and Fink, R.W., “Relative x-ray transition probabilities to the K-shell”, Nuclear Physics, Al42:604 (1970)Google Scholar
13. Slivinsky, V.W. and Ebert, P.J., “Kα/Kβ x-ray intensity ratios for elements from Z=29 to Z=92”, Physics Letters, 29A:463 (1969)Google Scholar
14. McCrary, J.H., Singman, L.V., Ziegler, L.H., Looney, L.D. and Edmonds, C.M., “K-fluorescent x-ray relative intensity measurements”, Physical Review, A4:1745 (1971)Google Scholar
15. Slivinsky, V.W. and Ebert, P.J., “Kα/Kβ x-ray intensity probability ratios for elements 18<Z<39”, Physical Review, A4:1581 (1971)Google Scholar
16. Salem, S.I., Falconer, T.H. and Winchell, R.W., “Kα/Kβ radiative transition probability ratios for elements of low atomic number in amorphous and crystal forms”, Physical Review, A6:2147(1972)Google Scholar
17. Keith, H.D. and Loomis, T.C., “Measurement of K-shell fluorescence yield and Kα/Kβ intensity ratio for Ni”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 7:217 (1978)Google Scholar
18. D.G.W., Smith, Reed, S.J.B. and Ware, N.G., “ α/Kβ intensity ratios for elements of atomic number 20-30”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 3:149 (1974)Google Scholar
19. Bodart, F., Wilk, S. and Deconninck, G., “Emission de rayonnement X par suite de bombardement de protons”, X-Ray Spectrommtry, 4:161 (1975)Google Scholar
20. McDaniel, F.D., Gray, T.J. and Gardner, E.K., “K-shell x-ray production cross section of selected elements form Ti to Y for 0.5 to 2.5 MeV alpha-particle bombardment”. Physical Review, A11:1607 (1975)Google Scholar
21. Negi, B. and Sadasivan, S., “X-ray emission intensities of radioisotopes produced by neutron activation”, X∼Ray Spectrometry, 9:159 (1980)Google Scholar
22. Beiersdorfer, P., Chen, M.H., MacLaren, S., Marrs, R.E., Vogel, D.A., Wong, K. and Zasadzinski, R., “Measurement of radiative branching ratios for K x-ray transitions in Cr21+, Mn22+, Fe23+, Ni25+ and Ge29+ ”, Physical Review, A44:4730 (1991)Google Scholar
23. Raghavaiah, C.V., Rao, N.V., Murty, G.S.K., Rao, M.V.S.C., Reddy, S.B. and Sastry, D.L., “ α/Kβ ratios and chemical effects in partially filled 3d-shell elements”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 21:239(1992)Google Scholar
24. McCrary, J.H., Singman, L.V., Ziegler, L.H., Looney, L.D. and Edmonds, C.M., “L x-ray relative intensity measurements”, Phys. Rev., A5:1578(1972)Google Scholar
25. Raghavaiah, C.V., Rao, N.V., Reddy, S.B., Satyanarayana, G., Murty, G.S.K., Rao, M.V.S.C. and Sastry, D.L., “Lα/Lβ and Lα/Lγ x-ray intensity ratios for elements in the range Z=55-80”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 19:23 (1990)Google Scholar
26. Darko, J.B. and Tetteh, G.K., “Measurement of relative intensities of L-shell x-ray of some heavy elements using Cdlog radioisotope source”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 21:111 (1992)Google Scholar
27. Shivastava, B.D., Gupta, G.D. and Joshi, S.K., “Measurement of intensities of some newly observed diagram lines in the L-emission spectra of La and Eu”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 21:21 (1992)Google Scholar
28. Tan, M., Sahin, Y. and Saplakoglu, A., “L3 subshell intensity ratios for Pb, Th and U”, X-ray Spectrometry, 19:233 (1990)Google Scholar
29. Salem, S.I., Panossian, S.L. and Krause, R.A., “Experimental K and L relative x-ray emission rates”, At. Data Nucl. Data Tab., 14:91(1974)Google Scholar
30. Sieber, K., A.M.M.Mohammedein, Musiol, G., Reiche, I. and Zschornack, G., “X-ray intensity ratios for microprobes and PIXE”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth, B68:292 (1992)Google Scholar
31. Nelson, G.C., Saunders, B.G. and Salem, S.I., “K x-ray transition probabilities”, Atomic Data, 1:377 (1970)Google Scholar
32. Khan, M.R. and Karimi, M., “Kβ/Kα ratios in energy-dispersive x-ray emission analysis”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 9:32 (1980)Google Scholar
33. Voutchkov, M.K., Stoev, K.N., Brudanin, V.G. and Egorov, V.G., “PC-based software system for energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis”, E6-90-421, Communications of JINR, Dubna, USSR, 1990.Google Scholar
34. Stoev, K.N. and Dlouhy, J.F., “EXFIT - a computer code for analysis of energy-dispersive x-ray spectra of environmental thin samples”, X-Ray Spectrometry (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
35. Thinh, T.P. and Leroux, J., “New basic empirical expression for computing x-ray mass attenuation coefficients”, X-Ray Spectr., 8:85 (1979)Google Scholar
36. “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics”, editor Weast, R.C., 58th edition, CRC Press, page E-136, (1978)Google Scholar
37. P. Van Espen, Nullens, H. and Adams, F., “A computer analysis of XRF spectra”, Nucl. Inst. & Meth., 142:243 (1977)Google Scholar
38. Nullens, H., P. Van Espen and Adams, F., “Linear and nonlinear peak fitting in EDXRF”, X-Ray Spectrometry, 8:104 (1979)Google Scholar
39. Stoev, K.N., Voutchkov, M.K. and Nikolova, E.L., “Examination of different non-linear fitting algorithms for x-ray spectrum processing with personal computers”, Bulgarian Journal of Physics, 17:407 (1990)Google Scholar