Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:32:25.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Areas for Improvement in XRF Analysis of Low Atomic Number Elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Bruno A.R. Vrebos  and
Gjalt T.J. Kuipéres
Bruno A.R. Vrebos
Affiliation:
Philips Analytical Lelyweg 1 7602EA Almelo The Netherlands
Gjalt T.J. Kuipéres
Affiliation:
Philips Analytical Lelyweg 1 7602EA Almelo The Netherlands
Get access

Extract

Accurate analysis of the light elements has been, from the early applications of X-ray fluorescence spectrometry a struggle compared to the determination of heavy elements in the same matrices. In contrast, there has been virtually no upper limit to the atomic number of the element that could be determined. The lower limit, however, has been continuously adjusted downward through the years. Clearly, the sensitivity as well as the lower limit of detection for the heavy elements have also been improved, but the effect is Jess striking than the advances made in the region of tight element performance. This paper deals specifically with wavelength dispersive sequential x-ray fluorescence spectrometry, although some of the observations made are equally applicable to energy dispersive spectrometry.

Type
II. Analysis of Light Elements by X-Ray Spectrometry
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 36: Forty-First Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-7, 1992 , 1992 , pp. 73 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bertin, E., “Principles and Practice of X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis”, Plenum Press, New York and London (1975), pp. 981.Google Scholar
2.Application Data Sheets AD92007 and AD92009, Philips Analytical, Almelo, the Netherlands (1992).Google Scholar
3. Bambynek, W., Crasemann, B., Fink, R. W., Freund, H. U., Swift, C. D., Price, R. E. and P. Venugapala Rao, X-ray Fluorescence Yields, Auger and Coster-Kronig Transition Probabilities, Rev. Mod. Phys., 44:716 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Jenkins, R. and de Vries, J.L., “Practical X-ray Spectrometry”, Macmillan Press Ltd, London (1970), pp 147.Google Scholar
5. Kikkert, J. N., X-Ray Spectrometry in the Eighties, Spectrochim. Acta, 38B:1497 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Nicolosi, J. A., Graven, J. P. and Merlo, D., The Use of Layered Synthetic Microstructures for Quantitative Analysis of Elements: Boron to Magnesium. Adv. X-Ray Anal., 30:183 (1987).Google Scholar