Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:59:02.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calibrating for X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Trace Quartz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Jacques Renault ,
Chris McKee  and
James Barker
Jacques Renault
Affiliation:
New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Division New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Campus Station, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Chris McKee
Affiliation:
New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Division New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Campus Station, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
James Barker
Affiliation:
New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Division New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Campus Station, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Get access

Abstract

Trace analysis of quartz at the <0.1 wt% level can be routinely accomplished by x-ray diffraction using rotating pressed-powder briquettes and a peak deconvolution strategy due to Wiedemann, et al. (1937a, b) which permits reproducible determination of background and enhances peak resolution without changing the integrated intensity.

Four calibration methods were tested: (1) calibration with perlites microscopically analyzed by Hamilton and Peletls (1988), (2) with artificial mixtures of quartz and glass, (3) with chemical analysis and massbalance calculation of quartz in glass mixtures, and (4) with a new method of additions for XRD.

Methods (2) and (4) gave the best results. Method (2) has a precision of 16.9 pet at the 0.1 wt% level and a LLD of 0.05 wt% at 3σ. Method (4) is particularly attractive because large spikes can be used which minimize homogenization errors and permit preparation of standards which have properties very similar to run-of-the-mill samples; the problem of non-zero intercepts is avoided.

Type
VI. XRD Instrumentation, Techniques and Reference Materials
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 35 , Issue A: First Pacific-International Congress on X-ray Analytical Methods (PICXAM). Fortieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 7-16, 1991 , 1991 , pp. 363 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, J.M., and McKee, C., 1989, Overview of the Impact on the Perlite Industry of IARC Classification of Crystal line Silica as a Group 2A (Probable) Carcinogen in Humans, Preprint 89-184 SME Annual Meeting, Littleton, Co., 31 pp.Google Scholar
Gysin, M., and Reelfs, D., 1951, Dosage du Quartz (Silice libre) dans les silicates. Note Preliminaire, Soc. Phys. et Hist. Nat. Geneve, 4:245.Google Scholar
Gysin, M., and Reelfs, D., 1952, Dosage du Quartz (Silice libre) dans les Silicates, Deuxieme Note, Soc. Phys. et Hist. Nat. Geneve, 5:818.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R.D., and Peletis, N.G., 1988, “The Determination of Quartz in Perlite by X-ray Diffraction”, Unpubl. Kept., Corporate Research and Engineering Center, Manville Sales Corp., 11 pp.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R.D., 1989, The Determination of Quartz in Perlite by X-ray Diffraction, in: “Advances in X-ray Analysis,” Barrett, C.S., Gilfrich, J.V., Huang, T.C., Jenkins, R., and Predecki, P.K., eds., Plenum Press, NY, 33:493.Google Scholar
IARC, 1987a, “Silica and Some Silicates,” IARC Monographs on the Carcinogenic Risks of Chemicals to Humans, Vol. 42, pp. 1–144.Google Scholar
IARC, 1987b, “Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity,” IARC Monographs, Supplement 7, pp. 29–74 and 341-343.Google Scholar
Klug, H.P., and Alexander, L.E., 1974, “X-ray Diffraction Procedures,” John Wiley and Sons, NY, 966 pp.Google Scholar
Kohyama, N., 1985, A New X-ray Diffraction Method for the Quantitative Analysis of Free Silica in the Airborne Dust in Working Environment, Indus. Health, 23:221.Google Scholar
Leroux, J. and Mahmud, M., 1960, Influence of goniometric arrangement and absorption in qualitative and quantitative analysis of powders by xray diffractometry, in “Advances in X-ray Analysis,” Muller, W.M., ed, 3:337.Google Scholar
McKee, C, Renault, J., and Barker, J. (1990), Quantitative analysis of quartz in perlite by X-ray diffraction: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Open-File report 364, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Renault, J., 1984, Turbine Drive sample Spinner for X-ray Diffraction, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 55:805.Google Scholar
Renault, J., C. McKee, and Barker, J. (1991) Quantitative X-ray diffration analysis of trace quartz in selected mineral products: Standardization II. in: “Environmental Management for the 1990's; Proceedings of the Symposium,” Lootens, D.J., Greenslade, W.M., Barker, J.M., eds., Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, pp. 361–362.Google Scholar
Trostel, L.J., and Wynne, D.J., 1940, Determination of Quartz (Free Silica) in Refractory Clays, J. Amer. Cer. Soc., 23:18.Google Scholar
Volborth, A., 1963, “Total Instrumental Analysis of Rocks,” Rep. 5, Nevada Bureau Mines 85 pp.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, K.E., Unnam, J., and Clark, R.K. (1987a) Deconvolution of powder diffraction spectra, Powder Diffraction, 2:130.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, K.E., Unnam, J., and Clark, R.K. (1987b) Computer program for deconvolution of powder diffraction spectra. Powder Diffraction, 2:137.Google Scholar