Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:02:01.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlations Between X-Ray Microstructures and Magnetic Properties of CoCrTa Alloy thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

T. C. Huang*
Affiliation:
IBM Research, Almaden Research Center 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
Get access

Abstract

Thin film structures determined by X-ray reflection and transmission diffractometer methods has been used to co rrelate with th e magnetic p roperties of CoCrTa thin films. Well-crystallized CoCrTa alloy particles with strong h.c.p. c-axis preferred oriented normal to the film surfaces were found to be mainly responsible for the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy observed in specimens IL and 8L, whereas poorly crystallized CoCrTa particles in the 150Å thick magnetic layers of a third specimen 33L have led to an observed longitudinal magnetization. Microstrains generated by the crystalline - amorphous interface stresses induced an enhanced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in specimen 8L. Values of crystallite size D determined from the Warren-Averbach analysis were correlated with the coercivities He. Analysis of the He vs. D curve indicated th a t the critical particle size for a magnetic multi- to single-domain transition was 270± 25Å. The retention in coercivity (Hc=175 Oe) at a small particle size (D=75Å) in specimen 8L suggested that strong interparticle interactions existed among the wellcrystallized CoCrTa particles. A much smaller retention in coercivity (Hc=90 Oe) at D=70Å of specimen 33L indicated the inter particle interactions in poorly crystallized CoCrTa layers were relatively weak.

Type
II. Characterization of Thin Films by XRD and XRF
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Iwasaki, S. and Nakamura, Y., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-13,1172 (1977).Google Scholar
2 Iwasaki, I S. and Ouchii, K., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-14, 849 (1978).Google Scholar
3 Langland, B.J. and Albert, P.A. IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-17,2547 (1981).Google Scholar
4 Kobayashi, F. and Ishida, G., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2453 (1981).Google Scholar
5 Robinson, C.J., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-22, 328 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Cullity, B.D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1972), Chapters 2 and 7.Google Scholar
7 Lim, G, Huang, T.C., Bullock, T.D.C., and Castillo, G. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3543 (1986),Google Scholar
8 Huang, T.C. and York, B.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 389 (1987),Google Scholar
9 Huang, T.C., Powder Diffraction (to be published).Google Scholar
10 Joint, P.F. Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, International Centre for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA, 1986.Google Scholar
11 Smith, D.K., Norelco Reporter XV, 57 (1968);Google Scholar
Borg, I.Y. and Smith, D.K., Calculated X -Ray Powder Patterns for Silica te Minerals (Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1969).Google Scholar
12 Warren, B.E. and Averbach, B.L., J. Appl. Phys. 21, 595 (1950); 23, 497 (1952).Google Scholar
13 Aspland, M., Jones, G.A., and Middleton, B.K., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-5, 314 (1969).Google Scholar
14 Chen, T., Rogowski, D.A., and White, R.M., I. Appl. Phys. 49, 1816 (1978).Google Scholar