Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:04:20.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of Stress Gradients by X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

J.M. Sprauel
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
M. Barral
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
S. Torbaty
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, 151 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
Get access

Extract

Among the limitations of the classical methods for measuring stresses by X-ray diffraction, the existence of stress gradients constitutes a particularly delicate problem. On the theoretical plane, this problem has been tackled by Dölle, Hauk and Cohen. These authors showed that whilst the gradients of the shear stresses σ13 and σ23+ are relatively easy to bring to the fore, as their presence is reflected in an opening out of the curves for 2θ ϕ ψ =f (sin2ψ), those of the direct stresses σ11, σ22 an σ33 are very difficult to detect. In the latter case it is demonstrated that even when the gradients attain very high values, the curves of 2θ ϕ ψ =f (sin2ψ) remain practically linear. This may invite one to apply the classical sin2ψ law, with the result that the stress values so determined do not correspond with the real mechanical state of the surface of the specimen.

Type
V. X-Ray Stress Determination, Position Sensitive Detectors, Fatigue and Fracture Characterization
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dölle, H. and Cohen, J.|B., Met. Trans.,Vol.11A, 1980, pp.159–2Google Scholar
2. Dölle, H. and Hauk, V., HTM, Vol. 34, 1979, pp. 272277 Google Scholar
3. Evenshor, P.D. Z. Metallkde, Vol.73, 1982, pp.387–2Google Scholar
4. Shiraiwa, T. and Sakamoto, Y., The Sumimoto Search 7, 1972, pp.109-1.Google Scholar
5. Hauk, V. and Kockelmann, H., Materialpruf., Vol.21, 1979, pp.201–2Google Scholar
6. Lebrun, J. L., Sprauel, J. M. and Maeder, G., Adv.in X-ray Anal., Vol.24, 1981, pp. 143148 Google Scholar