Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:42:16.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Fluorescence Critical Sample Thickness and Volume of Material Excited in Catalysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Frank Kunz  and
Ronald Belitz
Frank Kunz
Affiliation:
Analytical Sciences Department Ford Research Laboratory Dearborn, MI
Ronald Belitz
Affiliation:
Analytical Sciences Department Ford Research Laboratory Dearborn, MI
Get access

Extract

During the past fifteen years wavelength dispersive x-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) spectrometry has been the primary analytical technique for quantitative elemental analysis of automotive catalyst precious metals, contaminants, and substrate materials. While extensive work has been devoted to improving the accuracy of WDXRF quantitative procedures, minimal attention has been given to the calculation of critical sample thickness (primary x-ray beam depth of penetration) and total volume of material excited for each element in the catalyst. However, with the increasing use of WDXRF for measuring and comparing elemental concentrations at the inlet, middle, and outlet surfaces of catalysts, critical sample thickness and volume of material excited becomes very important for accurate interpretation of results.

Type
IV. On-Line, Industrial and Other Applications of XRS
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 36: Forty-First Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-7, 1992 , 1992 , pp. 145 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Artz, B. E., “X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Catalytic Converters using Single-element Standards and Theoretical Corrections for Interelement Effects”, X-ray Spectrometry. 6:165(1977).Google Scholar
2. Kallmann, S. and Blumberg, P., “Analysis of Automobile-Exhaust Emission-Control Catalysts”, Talanta, 27: 827 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Kallmann, S., “A Survey of the Determination of the Platinum Group Elements”, Talanta. 34: 677 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Kunz, F. W., Belitz, R. K.; McCabe, R., Chun, W., and Hurley, R. G., “X-ray Fluorescence Technique for Determining Optimum Precious Metals Loadings of Serially-mounted Pt/Rh and Fd/Rh Catalysts for European Driving Conditions”, Ford Technical Report SR90-70, April 25, 1990.Google Scholar
5. Jenkins, R., An Introduction to X-ray Spectrometry. Heyden & Sons, Ltd., New York (1974).Google Scholar
6. Bertin, E. P., Principles and Practice of X-ray Spectrometric Analysis. Plenum Press, New York (1971).Google Scholar
7. Tertian, R. and Claisse, F., Principles of Quantitative X-ray Fluorescence Analysis, Heyden & Sons, Ltd., New York (1982).Google Scholar
8.Laboratory and Recitation Notebook, X-ray Short Course, State Universty of New York, June 1986, p. 26.Google Scholar
9. Stephenson, D., “Theoretical Analysis of Quantitative X-ray Emission Data: Glasses, Rocks, and Metals”, Analytical Chemistry. 43: 13 (1971).Google Scholar
10.XRF Data Ease Search Software, unpublished research, F. W. Kunz, 1990.Google Scholar
11. Tertian, R. and Claisse, F., Principles of Quantitative X-ray Fluorescence Analysis. Heyden & Sons, Ltd., New York (1982).Google Scholar
12. Feret, F. R. and Sokolowski, J., “Effect of Sample Surface Integrity on X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Aluminum Alloys”, Spectroscopy, 4: 39 (1989).Google Scholar