Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:33:56.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XRD Pattern Fitting as a Tool to Control Plating Parameters in Zinc Nickel Electroplates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Lloyd Hammond
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory Defence Science and Technology Organisation Melbourne, Australia
Don Wright
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory Defence Science and Technology Organisation Melbourne, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Rietveld X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and uniaxial stress measurement procedures are being evaluated as a means of correlating the crystalline structure properties of zinc-nickel electroplate with observed plating properties. The study is being performed on a suite of six samples of varying composition (6 to 20%Ni) electrodeposited on mild steel. Rietveld refinement of the XRD data (Rietveld, 1969) has been performed on a specially prepared ingot (9%Ni:91%Zn) to determine the structural parameters and relative abundances for the γ(Ni4Zn22), δ(Ni3Zn22) and η(Zn) phases which could possibly be present in the electroplate. Relative phase abundances were verified by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) image mapping techniques.

The structural parameters for the ingot zinc-nickel phases were subsequently used as initial parameters in Rietveld calculations for the six electroplate samples. Structure refinement of the electroplate XRD data was hampered by extremely high preferred orientation and the corresponding lack of quality diffraction peaks. However, Rietveld refinements produced accurate cell dimensions (which correlate linearly with nickel composition), a means of quantifying the degree of preferred orientation, and crystalline phase verification. For residual stress determination, d-sin2ψ plots were produced for each electroplate sample. The plots were found to be linear for Ni < 12%, allowing calculation of residual stress, and distinctly curved for Ni > 12%.

Type
VI. Whole Pattern Fitting, Phase Analysis by Diffraction Methods
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheary, W.C., and Coelho, A., 1992, A Fundamental Parameters Approach to X-ray Line Profile Fitting, J. Appl. Cryst., 25:109.Google Scholar
Critchley, J.K., and Denton, S., 1971, The Crystal Structure of 5-Ni-Zn, J. of the Instit. of Metals., 99:26.Google Scholar
Cullity, , 1978, “Elements of X-ray Diffraction”, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Dollase, W.A., 1986, corrections of Intensities for Preferred Orientation in Powder Diffractometry: Application of the March Model, J. Appl. Cryst., 19:267.Google Scholar
Hansen, M., 1958, Constitution of Binary Alloys, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, R.J., and Howard, C.J., 1987, Quantitative Phase Analysis from Neutron Powder Diffraction Data Using the Rietveld Method, J. of Mat. Sci., 20:467.Google Scholar
Morton, A.J., 1978, The γ-Phase Regions of the Cu-Zn, Ni-Zn and Pd-Zn Binary Systems, Acta Metallurgica. 27:863.Google Scholar
Pearson, W.B., 1958, “A Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys”, Pergamon Press, London, 4:203.Google Scholar
Rietveld, H., 1969, A Profile Refinement Method for Nuclear and Magnetic Structures, J. Appl, Cryst., 2:65.Google Scholar
Sasaki, T., Kuramoto, M., and Yoshoika, Y., 1991, A Method for X-ray Stress Analysis of Thin Films and its Application to Zinc-Nickel-Alloy Electroplated Steel, Advances in X-rav Analysis. 34:699 Google Scholar
Watson, S.A., 1992, Electrodeposited Coatings of Zinc-Nickel, Trans. Inst. Metal Finish., 70:28.Google Scholar