Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:10:15.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamics of a wing under figure-of-eight flapping motion: FSI simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Y.-J. Chu Open the ORCID record for Y.-J. Chu [Opens in a new window] ,
H.-L. Liew Open the ORCID record for H.-L. Liew [Opens in a new window]  and
P. Balan Ganesan Open the ORCID record for P. Balan Ganesan [Opens in a new window]
Y.-J. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
H.-L. Liew
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
P. Balan Ganesan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Centre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), Level 3, Research Management & Innovation Complex, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*
poo_ganesan@um.edu.my
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the aerodynamics of a wing under figure-of-eight flapping motion based on Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. The kinematic of a wing under figure-of-eight motion creates a condition with a variable angle-of-attack. The effect of using different angles of attack at an initial condition, namely initial pitch angles, for the wing and the spatial size of the figure-of-eight pattern, namely the input link angle, is investigated. The initial pitch angles input is varied from 0° to 330° in steps of 30°, and the input link angles used are 30°, 45°, and 60°. The Young’s modulus of the wing is 3.4 GPa spanwise, which is the elastic modulus of balsa wood material. In comparison with an initial pitch angle of 0°, the 90° initial pitch angle shows much better flight performance in terms of lift generated and stability. The results show that the maximum average lift coefficient of 0.393 occurs at the 90° initial pitch angle. The maximum lift-induced moment for the 90° initial pitch angle is only 5.55% of the maximum lift induced moment for the 0° initial pitch angle. A higher input link angle generates a greater lift force. The pressure distribution in the vicinity of the wing area and the von Mises stress of the wing are also presented.

Keywords

Figure-of-eight motionFlapping wingAngle-of-attackPitch angleElastic wingYoung’s modulusInput link angleFSI
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 125 , Issue 1293 , November 2021 , pp. 1917 - 1941
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Raymer, D. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 6th ed, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzer, M.F., Jones, K.D., Young, J., and Lai, J.C.S. Flapping-wing aerodynamics: Progress and challenges, AIAA J, 2008, 46, (9), pp 2136–2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bin Abas, M.F., Bin Mohd Rafie, A.S., Bin Yusoff, H., and Bin Ahmad, K.A., Flapping wing micro-aerial-vehicle: Kinematics, membranes, and flapping mechanisms of ornithopter and insect flight, Chin J Aeronaut, 2016, 29, (5), pp 1159–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazaheri, K. and Ebrahimi, A., Experimental investigation on aerodynamic performance of a flapping wing vehicle in forward flight, J Fluids Struct, 2011, 27, (4), pp 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lian, Y., Broering, T., Hord, K., and Prater, R., The characterization of tandem and corrugated wings, Prog Aerosp Sci, 2014, 65, pp 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S.K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.K., Cesnik, C.E.S., and Liu, H., Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity, Prog Aerosp Sci, 2010, 46, (7), pp 284–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, M. and Lan, S.L., A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hovering, J Exp Biol, 2004, 207, (11), pp 1887–1901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mou, X.L., Liu, Y.P., and Sun, M., Wing motion measurement and aerodynamics of hovering true hoverflies, J Exp Biol, 2011, 214, (17), pp 2832–2844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zbikowski, R., Galiński, C., and Pedersen, C.B., Four-bar linkage mechanism for insectlike flapping wings in hover: Concept and an outline of its realization, J Mech Des Trans ASME, 2005, 127, (4), pp 817–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GaliŃski, C. and Zbikowski, R., Insect-like flapping wing mechanism based on a double spherical Scotch yoke, J R Soc Interface, 2005, 2, (3), pp 223–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banala, S.K. and Agrawal, S.K., Design and optimization of a mechanism for out-of-plane insect winglike motion with twist, J Mech Des Trans ASME, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehmat, Z.P. Design of Figure-8 Speherical Motion Flapping Wing for Miniature UAVs, Las Vegas: University of Nevada, 2009.Google Scholar
Rehmat, Z., Lee, J.S., Trabia, M.B., Roll, J., and Yim, W., Design of “figure-8” spherical motion flapping wing for miniature UAV, in, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2009, 49002, pp 539–546.Google Scholar
Pourtousi, M., Ganesan, P., Sandaran, S.C., and Sahu, J.N., Effect of ring sparger diameters on hydrodynamics in bubble column: A numerical investigation, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, 2016, 69, pp 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganesan, P.B., Tariqul Islam, M., Pokrajac, D., Hamad, F.A., and Sandaran, S.C., Coalescence and rising behavior of co-axial and lateral bubbles in viscous fluid: a CFD study, Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng, 2017, 12, (4), pp 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behroyan, I., Ganesan, P., He, S., and Sivasankaran, S., CFD models comparative study on nanofluids subcooled flow boiling in a vertical pipe, Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl, 2018, 73, (1), pp 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frunzulica, F., Dumitrache, A., and Stoia-Desjka, M., A method of harvesting energy from wind using a flapping wing, in, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1798, (1), p 020057, 2017, AIP Publishing LLC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowell, E.H. and Hall, K.C., Modeling of fluid–structure interaction, Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2001, 33, (1), pp 445–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotiropoulos, F. and Yang, X., Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid-structure interaction, Prog Aerosp Sci, 2014, 65, pp 1–21.Google Scholar
Wang, M., Avital, E.J., Bai, X., Ji, C., Xu, D., Williams, J.J.R., and Munjiza, A., Fluid–structure interaction of flexible submerged vegetation stems and kinetic turbine blades, Comput Part Mech, 2019, p 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Goosen, J.F.L., and van Keulen, F., An efficient fluid–structure interaction model for optimizing twistable flapping wings, J Fluids Struct, 2017, 73, pp 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahzad, A., Tian, F.B., Young, J., and Lai, J.C.S., Effects of flexibility on the hovering performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios, J Fluids Struct, 2018, 81, pp 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T. and Liu, H., A fluid–structure interaction model of insect flight with flexible wings, J Comput Phys, 2012, 231, (4), pp 1822–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, H., Luo, H., and Doyle, J.F., Dynamic pitching of an elastic rectangular wing in hovering motion, J Fluid Mech, 2012, 693, pp 473–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aftab, S.M.A., Rafie, A.S.M., Razak, N.A., and Ahmad, K.A., Turbulence model selection for low Reynolds number flows, PLoS One, 2016, 11, (4), e0153755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M., and Langtry, R., Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model, Turbul Heat Mass Transf, 2003, 4, (1), pp 625–632.Google Scholar
Radermacher, R.D., Computational Analysis of a Wing Oscillator, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, 2012.Google Scholar
Hope, D.K., DeLuca, A.M., and O’Hara, R.P., Investigation into Reynolds number effects on a biomimetic flapping wing, Int J Micro Air Veh, 2018, 10, (1), pp 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, S.S., Zhao, J., Sheridan, J., Hourigan, K., and Thompson, M.C., Aspect ratio studies on insect wings, Phys Fluids, 2019, 31, (12), p 121301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. and Roth, B., Analysis of Mechanisms and Robot Manipulators, J Appl Mech, 1981, 48, (1), pp 214–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, B.W., Aerodynamics Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics John Wiley & Sons. Inc, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Forest Products Laboratory - USDA, Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material, USDA - Gen Tech Rep, 2010.Google Scholar
Fluent, A., ANSYS Fluent 15.0 user’s guide, Ansys Inc, 2013.Google Scholar
Sohail, M. and Ullah, R., CFD of Oscillating Airfoil Pitch Cycle by using PISO Algorithm, Eng Technol, 2011, 60, pp 1929–1933.Google Scholar
Wan, T. and Huang, C.K., Numerical simulation of flapping wing aerodynamic performance under gust wind conditions, in, ICAS Secretariat - 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences 2008, ICAS 2008, 2008, pp 1–11.Google Scholar