Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:13:53.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An objective method of assessing the realism of a simulation of a simple control system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

W. H. Ekin  and
D. McCloy
W. H. Ekin
Affiliation:
Robert Gordon's Institute of Technology, Aberdeen
D. McCloy
Affiliation:
The Ulster Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although the latest aircraft flight simulators incorporate much recent technical development and are becoming increasingly accepted by the world's airlines, government regulatory agencies and air forces for pilot training and checking, there does not exist any completely satisfactory objective method for assessing their realism. If an objective method of measuring the realism of an aircraft simulator could be developed, it might be possible to reduce the often lengthy period needed by the simulator manufacturer in making final adjustments (tweaking) before customer acceptance, or to monitor the realism in service (15 year service life being typical), or to achieve the same degree of realism with equipment of a significantly lower specification and therefore much lower cost.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 84 , Issue 836 , September 1980 , pp. 278 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Lecturer, School of Mechanical and Offshore Engineering

†

Professor and Dean of the Faculty of Technology, The Ulster Polytechnic.

References

1. Cummings, T. J. A quantitative investigation of aircraft simulator pitch motion laws. PhD Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast, 1973.Google Scholar
2. Ekin, W. H. A quantitative investigation of the effects of motion on an aircraft simulation. PhD Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast, 1977.Google Scholar
3. Bendat, J. S. and Piersol, A. G. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
4. Ekin, W. H. and McCloy, D. The use of the power spectral density function to measure the effects of motion on an aircraft simulation. The Aeronautical Journal of the RAeS, Vol 84, pp 101–107, March/April 1980.Google Scholar