Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:58:33.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and analysis of variable camber wing of propeller aircraft using the actuator disc method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2022

R. Liu Open the ORCID record for R. Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
J. Bai ,
Y. Qiu  and
Y. Li
R. Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an710072, China
J. Bai
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an710072, China
Y. Qiu
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an710072, China
Y. Li
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an710072, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: lr300150@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variable camber flap technology can adjust the spanwise circulation distribution, thereby reducing the induced drag. Therefore, the concept of variable camber flap is introduced into the design of propeller aircraft wing, and the design for drag reduction of propeller aircraft is carried out. The numerical simulation of the propeller aircraft is carried out by using the actuator disc method with non-uniform distribution of radial and circumferential loads. Through the unsteady simulation of a single propeller, the aerodynamic load on a periodic propeller is extracted as a boundary condition to the steady simulation of the full aircraft. The load extracted by the actuator disc is compared with the unsteady simulation result, which verifies the reliability of the method. The design for drag reduction at cruise and climb design conditions are respectively carried out with the variable camber flap technology. The variable camber cruise configuration is evaluated at both the begin and end cruise conditions. The results show that, after the flaps deflecting at a small angle according to the circulation distribution, the camber distribution of the wing is adjusted to make the circulation distribution closer to the elliptical circulation distribution. At the design cruise condition, the drag coefficient is reduced by 1.4 counts, and the lift-drag ratio increase by 0.1. At both begin and end cruise conditions, the drag coefficient decreases by 1 count, and the lift-drag ratio increases by 0.07. At the design climb condition, the drag coefficient decreases by 1 count, and the lift-to-drag ratio increases by 0.09.

Keywords

actuator discvariable cambercirculation distributionflapspropeller aircraft
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 126 , Issue 1306 , December 2022 , pp. 2134 - 2155
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Neittaanmäki, P., Rossi, T., Korotov, S., et al. Overview on drag reduction technologies for civil transport aircraft, European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS). 2004, pp 24–28.Google Scholar
Nguyen, N. and Urnes, J. Aeroelastic modeling of elastically shaped aircraft concept via wing shaping control for drag reduction, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, 2012, p 4642.Google Scholar
Shiva Kumar, M.R., Srinath, R., Vigneshwar, K., et al. Aerodynamic design optimization of an aircraft wing for drag reduction using computational fluid dynamics approach, Wind and Structures, 2020, 31, (1), pp 15–20.Google Scholar
Beck, N., Landa, T., Seitz, A., et al. Drag reduction by laminar flow control, Energies, 2018, 11, (1), p 252.Google Scholar
Aoki, Y. and Muraoka, K. Forward wing tip design for induced drag reduction of quad tilt wing VTOL un-manned plane in cruise, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019, p 1307.Google Scholar
Demasi, L., Monegato, G., Cavallaro, R., et al. Minimum induced drag conditions for winglets: The best winglet design concept, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019, p 2301.Google Scholar
Guo, L., Tao, J., Wang, C., et al. Fuel efficiency optimization of high-aspect-ratio aircraft via variable camber technology considering aeroelasticity, Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerosp Eng, 2020, p 0954410020959964.Google Scholar
Burdette, D.A. and Martins, J.R.R.A. Impact of morphing trailing edges on mission performance for the common research model, J Aircr, 2019, 56, (1), pp 369–384.Google Scholar
Greff, E. The development and design integration of a variable camber wing for long/medium range aircraft, Aeronaut J, 1990, 94, (939), pp 301–312.Google Scholar
Szodruch, J. and Hilbig, R. Variable wing camber for transport aircraft, Prog Aerosp Sci, 1988, 25, (3), pp 297–328.Google Scholar
Vasista, S., Riemenschneider, J., Keimer, R., et al. Morphing wing droop nose with large deformation: ground tests and lessons learned, Aerospace, 2019, 6, (10), p 111.Google Scholar
Fielding, J.P. Design investigation of variable-camber flaps for high-subsonic airliners, Proc., 2000.Google Scholar
Kaul, U.K. and Nguyen, N.T. Drag optimization study of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF) using OVERFLOW, 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2014, p 2444.Google Scholar
Ting, E., Chaparro, D., Nguyen, N., et al. Optimization of variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap configuration for drag reduction, J Aircr, 2018, 55, (6), pp 2217–2239.Google Scholar
Lebofsky, S., Ting, E., Nguyen, N.T., et al. Aeroelastic modeling and drag optimization of flexible wing aircraft with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap, 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2014, p 2443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. 787 Systems and Performance, The Boeing Company, 2005.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Ouyang, S. and Zhao, X. Drag reduction effect of a variable camber wing of a transport aircraft based on trailing edge flap deflection of small angles, Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, Springer, Singapore, 2018, pp 1508–1514.Google Scholar
Moens, F. and Gardarein, P. Numerical simulation of the propeller/wing interactions for transport aircraft, 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2001, p 2404.Google Scholar
Bo, L., Dewang, L. and Guoping, H. Propeller slipstream effects on aerodynamic performance of turbo-prop airplane based on equivalent actuator disk model, Acta Astronaut., 2008, 29, (4), pp 845–852.Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Yang, C.J. and Song, B.W. Investigations on the numerical simulation method for the open-water performance of contra-rotating propellers based on the MRF model, J Ship Mechan, 2010, 14, (8), pp 847–853.Google Scholar
Müller, L., Kozulovic, D. and Friedrichs, J. Unsteady flow simulations of an over-the-wing propeller configuration, 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2014, p 3886.Google Scholar
Bontempo, R. and Manna, M. Analysis and evaluation of the momentum theory errors as applied to propellers, AIAA J, 2016, 54, (12), pp 3840–3848.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, Y. Numerical research of a propeller plane based on actuator disc model, 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS). 2017, pp 3–6.Google Scholar
Xia, Z. Numerical approach of propeller slipstream Simulations and aerodynamic interference analysis. Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015.Google Scholar
Menter, F. Zonal two-equation k $\omega$ turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, 1993, p 2906.Google Scholar
Xu, S., Long, X., Ji, B., et al. Vortex dynamic characteristics of unsteady tip clearance cavitation in a waterjet pump determined with different vortex identification methods, J Mech Sci Technol, 2019, 33, (12), pp 5901–5912.Google Scholar