Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:52:07.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of a Riemann solver for the steady supersonic Euler equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

E. F. Toro  and
A. Chakraborty
E. F. Toro
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and PhysicsManchester Metropolitan University
A. Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Lola Cars Limited
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An improved version (HLLC) of the Harten, Lax, van Leer Riemann solver (HLL) for the steady supersonic Euler equations is presented. Unlike the HLL, the HLLC version admits the presence of the slip line in the structure of the solution. This leads to enhanced resolution of computed slip lines by Godunov type methods. We assess the HLLC solver in the context of the first order Godunov method and the second order weighted average flux method (WAF). It is shown that the improvement embodied in the HLLC solver over the HLL solver is virtually equivalent to incorporating the exact Riemann solver.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 98 , Issue 979 , November 1994 , pp. 325 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Godunov, S.K. A finite difference method for the numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics, Math Sbornik, November 1960, 47, (3), pp 271–306. Translated by JPRS 7225 U.S. Dept. of Commerce.Google Scholar
2. Roe, P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes, J Comput Phys, 1981, 43, pp 357–372.10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5Google Scholar
3. Toro, E.F. and Chou, C.C. Numerical solution of the inviscid steady supersonic Euler equations using a linearised Riemann solver, Int J Num Methods Fluids, February 1993, 16, (3), pp 173–186.Google Scholar
4. Harten, A., Lax, P. and Van Leer, B. On upstream differencing and Godunov type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Review, January 1983, 25, (1), pp 35–61.10.1137/1025002Google Scholar
5. Toro, E.F. A weighted average flux method for hyperbolic conservation laws, Proc R. Soc London, 1989, A423, pp 401–418 Google Scholar
6. Colella, P.A. Direct Eulerian MUSCL scheme for gas dynamics, SIAM J Sci Stat Comput, 1984, pp 104–117.Google Scholar
7. Toro, E.F. Orozco, J. HILL and Chou., C.C. Riemann solver adaptation for the steady supersonic Euler equations, Editors: Hirsch, , Periaux, and Kordulla, . In: Proc First Euro Conf in Comp Fluid Dyn, Elsevier Publishers, 1992, 2, pp 719–726.Google Scholar
8. Toro, E.F., Saito, T. and Takayama, K. Efficient Riemann solvers for computational gas dynamics. Proc Fifth Int Sym on Comp Fluid Dyn, Sendai, Japan, (1993) (to appear).Google Scholar
9. Ben-Artzi, M., and Falcovitz, J. A second order Godunov-type scheme for compressible fluid dynamics. J Comp Phys, 1984, 55, pp 1–32.10.1016/0021-9991(84)90013-5Google Scholar
10. Van Leer, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III: Upstream centered finite difference schemes for ideal compressible flow, J Comput Phys, 1977, 23, pp 263–275.Google Scholar
11. Anderson, J.D. Jr. Modern compressible flow: with historical perspective, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1990.Google Scholar