Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:25:46.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shock Tunnel Operation with an Expansive Area Change at the Main Diaphragm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. M. Gore  and
R. J. Stalker
M. M. Gore
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Australian National University, Canberra
R. J. Stalker
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of an expansive area change immediately following the diaphragm has afforded considerable convenience in shock tube applications and has been studied by a number of authors. It allows the use of a smaller diaphragm, thereby reducing the disturbance to the shock tube flow caused by the diaphragm opening, and it also permits greater flexibility in the choice of driver section configurations for a given shock tube size.

It is natural to consider the extension of this idea to shock tunnel operation. This has been encouraged by the possibility of applying area change to operation of an arc-driven shock-tunnel. Some early success in employing arc-heated drivers for shock tunnels has been reported by Warren et al. However, the configuration they studied employed a long driver section to achieve correspondingly long test times. In addition, to achieve a constant shock velocity it was necesssary that electrical energy was added so that the gas was heated uniformly before the diaphragm ruptured. This necessitated a fast discharge condenser bank, with a high discharge voltage, the latter to enable an arc to be sustained over the length of the driver section. In the present application, a constriction between the driver section and the shock tube is employed, allowing the driver section to be treated as a constant pressure reservoir of gas. It is anticipated that this will allow the use of shorter drivers, thereby permitting the adoption of lower discharge voltages, and will also allow energy to be added relatively slowly while the shock tunnel is operating. This will produce substantial economies in provision of the large energy storage facilities required for shock-tunnel operation.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 74 , Issue 710 , February 1970 , pp. 149 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lin, S. C. and Fyfe, W. I. Low-density Shock Tube for Chemical Kinetics Studies. Phys Fluids, Vol 4, pp 238–249, 1961.Google Scholar
2. Camm, J. C. and Rose, P. H. Electric Arc-driven Shock Tube. Phys Fluids, Vol. 6, p 663, 1963.Google Scholar
3. Russell, D. A. A Study of Area Change Near the Diaphragm of a Shock Tube. Guggenheim Aeronautical Laboratory, California Inst of Technology, Hypersonic Research Project Memo No 57, 1960.Google Scholar
4. Laderman, A. J. Shock-tube Performance with Area Divergence at the Diaphragm Section. AIAA Journal, Vol 5, p 1904, October 1967.Google Scholar
5. Warren, W. R., Rogers, D. A. and Harris, C. J. The Development of an Electrically Heated Shock Driven Test Facility. General Electric Space Sciences Laboratory Report R62SD37, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Wittliff, C. E., Wilson, M. R. and Hertzberg, A. The Tailored-interface Hypersonic Shock Tunnel. Journal of Aero I Space Sciences, Vol 26, p 219. 1959.Google Scholar