Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:37:40.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamic study of aerofoil and wing in simulated rain environment via a two-way coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

Z. Wu  and
Y. Cao
Y. Cao
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aerodynamic performance degradation has been considered a critical hazard to aircraft due to flying in heavy rain. In this work, a two-way momentum coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach is developed to study the aerodynamic performance of a two-dimensional (2D) transport-type NACA 64-210 cruise and landing configuration aerofoil as well as a three-dimensional (3D) NACA 64-210 cruise configuration rectangular wing in heavy rain environment. Raindrop impacts, splashback and formed water film are modeled. The steady-state incompressible air flow field and the raindrop trajectory are calculated alternately by incorporating an interphase momentum coupling term through a curvilinear body-fitted grid surrounding the aerofoil/wing. Our simulation results agree well with the experimental results and show significant aerodynamic penalties for all the test cases in heavy rain. Rain-induced premature boundary-layer transition and separation are observed and details of the raindrop splashback effect on the boundary layer are examined. A 1° rain-induced decrease in stall angle-of-attack is predicted. An uneven water film upon the wing surface is observed and its effect on the wing surface roughness is also examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1204 , June 2014 , pp. 643 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Luers, J.K. and Haines, P.A. Heavy rain influence on airplane accidents, J Aircr, 1983, 20, (2), pp 187–191.Google Scholar
2. Luers, J.K. and Haines, P.A. The effect of heavy rain on wind shear attributed accidents, AIAA Paper 81-0390, 1981.Google Scholar
3. Haines, P.A. and Luers, J.K. Aerodynamic penalties of heavy rain on a landing aircraft, NASA CR-156885, 1982.Google Scholar
4. Rhode, R.V. Some effects of rainfall on flight of airplanes and on instrument indications, NASA TN-903, 1941.Google Scholar
5. Hansman, R.J. and Craig, A.P. Low Reynolds number tests of NACA 64-210, NACA 0012, and Wortman FX67-K170 airfoils in rain, J Aircr, 1987, 24, (8), pp 559–566.Google Scholar
6. Campbell, B.A. and Bezos, G.M. Steady state and transitional aerodynamic characteristics of a wing in simulated heavy rain, NASA TP-2932, 1989.Google Scholar
7. Yip, L.P. Wind tunnel investigation of a full-scale ca-nard-configured general aviation aircraft, NASA TP-2382, 1985.Google Scholar
8. Hansman, R.J. and Barsotti, M.F. The aerodynamic effect of surface wetting effects on a laminar flow airfoil in simulated heavy rain, J Aircr, 1985, 22, (12), pp 1049–1053.Google Scholar
9. Bezos, G.M., Dunham, R.E., Gentry, G.L. and Melson, W.E. Wind tunnel aerodynamic characteristics of a transport-type airfoil in a simulated heavy rain environment, NASA TP-3184, 1992.Google Scholar
10. Thompson, B.E., Jang, J. and Dion, J.L. Wing performance in moderate rain, J Aircr, 1995, 32, (5), pp 1034–1039.Google Scholar
11. Thompson, B.E. and Jang, J. Aerodynamic performance of wings in rain, J Aircr, 1996, 33, (6), pp 1047–1053.Google Scholar
12. Valentine, J.R. and Decker, R.A. A Lagrangian-Eulerian scheme for flow around an airfoil in rain, Int J Multiphase Flow, 1995, 21, (4), pp 639–648.Google Scholar
13. Valentine, J.R. and Decker, R.A. Tracking of raindrops in flow over an airfoil, J Aircr, 1995, 32, (1), pp 100–105.Google Scholar
14. Thompson, B.E. and Marrochello, M.R. Rivulet formation in surface-water flow on an airfoil in rain, AIAA J, 1999, 37, (1), pp 45–50.Google Scholar
15. Wan, T. and Wu, S.W. Aerodynamic analysis under influence of heavy rain, J Aeronautics, Astronautics, and Aviation, 2009, 41, (3), pp 173–180.Google Scholar
16. Wan, T. and Pan, S.P. Aerodynamic performance study under the influence of heavy rain via two-phase flow approach, 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2010.Google Scholar
17. Wan, T. and Chou, C.J. Reinvestigation of landing airfoil under the influence of heavy rain effects, 50th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 2012.Google Scholar
18. Wan, T. and Song, B.C. Aerodynamic performance study of a modern blended-wing-body aircraft under severe weather simulation, 50th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 2012.Google Scholar
19. Wu, Z.L., Cao, Y.H. and Ismail, M. Numerical simulation of airfoil aerodynamic penalties and mechanisms in heavy rain, Int J Aerospace Engineering, 2013.Google Scholar
20. Dukowicz, J.K. A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays, J Computational Physics, 1980, 35, (2), pp 229–253.Google Scholar
21. Crowe, C.T., Stock, D.E. and Sharma, M.P. The parti-cle-source-in-cell (PSI-Cell) model for gas-droplet flows, J Fluids Engineering, 1977, 99, pp 325–332.Google Scholar
22. Bilanin, A.J. Scaling laws for testing airfoils under heavy rainfall, J Aircr, 1987, 24, (1), pp 31–37.Google Scholar
23. Leonard, B.P. and Mokhtari, S. ULTRA-SHARP nonoscillatory convection schemes for high-speed steady multidimensional fow, NASA TM 1-2568, 1990.Google Scholar
24. David, C.W. Turbulence modeling for CFD, La Canada: DCW industries, 1998.Google Scholar
25. Kader, B.A. Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers, Int J Heat and Mass Transfer, 1981, 24, (9), pp 1541–1544.Google Scholar
26. Marshall, J.S. and Palmer, W.K. The distribution of raindrops with size, J Meteorology, 1948, 5, (4), pp 165–166.Google Scholar
27. Joss, J. and Waldvogel, A. Raindrop size distribution and sampling size errors, J Atmospheric Sciences, 1969, 26, (3), pp 566–569.Google Scholar
28. Markowitz, A.H. Raindrop size distribution expressions, J Applied Meteorology, 1976, 15, (9), pp 1029–1031.Google Scholar
29. Morsi, S.A. and Alexander, A.J. An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems, J Fluid Mechanics, 1972, 55, (2), pp 193–208.Google Scholar
30. Anderson, D.A., Tannehill, J.C. and Pletcher, R.H. Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer, Hemisphere, New York, USA, 1984.Google Scholar
31. Stanton, D.W. and Rutland, C.J. Multi-dimensional modeling of thin liquid films and spray-wall interactions resulting from impinging sprays, Int J Heat and Mass Transfer, 1998, 44, pp 3037–3054.Google Scholar
32. Mundo, C., Sommerfeld, M. and Tropea, C. Droplet-wall collisions: experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process, Int J Multiphase Flow, 1995, 21, (2), pp 151–173.Google Scholar
33. Dunham, R.E. Potential influences of heavy rain on general aviation airplane performance, AIAA General Aviation Technology Conference, Anaheim, California, USA, 1986.Google Scholar