Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:34:49.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of human behaviour during aircraft evacuation situations using the AASK v3.0 database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

E. R. Galea ,
K. M. Finney ,
A. J. P. Dixon ,
A. Siddiqui  and
D. P. Cooney
E. R. Galea
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich, London, UK
K. M. Finney
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich, London, UK
A. J. P. Dixon
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich, London, UK
A. Siddiqui
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich, London, UK
D. P. Cooney
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Aircraft Accident Statistics and Knowledge (AASK) database is a repository of survivor accounts from aviation accidents. Its main purpose is to store observational and anecdotal data from the actual interviews of the occupants involved in aircraft accidents. The database has wide application to aviation safety analysis, being a source of factual data regarding the evacuation process. It is also key to the development of aircraft evacuation models such as airEXODUS, where insight into how people actually behave during evacuation from survivable aircraft crashes is required. This paper describes recent developments with the database leading to the development of AASK v3.0. These include significantly increasing the number of passenger accounts in the database, the introduction of cabin crew accounts, the introduction of fatality information, improved functionality through the seat plan viewer utility and improved ease of access to the database via the internet. In addition, the paper demonstrates the use of the database by investigating a number of important issues associated with aircraft evacuation. These include issues associated with social bonding and evacuation, the relationship between the number of crew and evacuation efficiency, frequency of exit/slide failures in accidents and exploring possible relationships between seating location and chances of survival. Finally, the passenger behavioural trends described in analysis undertaken with the earlier database are confirmed with the wider data set.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1070 , April 2003 , pp. 219 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Galea, E.R. and Owen, M., THE AASK DATABASE: A database of human experience In evacuation derived from air accident reports, Proc, Int Aircraft Fire & Cabin Safety Conf, 16-20 November, 1998, Atlantic City, DOT/FAA/AR-99/68, 1998.Google Scholar
2. Owen, M., Galea, E.R., Lawrence, P.J. and Filippidis, L., AASK – aircraft accident statistics and knowledge: A database of human experience in evacuation reports, Aeronaut J, August/September 1998, 102, (1017), pp 353–363.Google Scholar
3. Galea, E.R., Cooney, D., Dixon, A.J.P., Finney, K. and Siddiqui, A., THE AASK DATABASE: Aircraft accident statistics and knowledge. A database to record human experience of evacuation in aviation accidents. CAA Paper 2002/3, ISBN 086039 803X, published by the UK Civil Aviation Authority, August 2002.Google Scholar
4. Galea, E.R. and Galparsoro, J.M.P. 1994, A computer based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass transport vehicles, J Fire Safety, 22, pp 341–366.Google Scholar
5. Galea, E.R., Owen, M. and Lawrence, P. 1996, Computer modelling of human behaviour in aircraft fire accidents, Toxicology, 115, 1-3, pp 63–78.Google Scholar
6. Owen, M., Galea, E.R., Lawrence, P.J. and Filippidis, L., The numerical simulation of aircraft evacuation and its application to aircraft design and certification. Aeronaut J, June/July 1998, 102, (1015), pp 301–312.Google Scholar
7. Blake, S.J., Galea, E.R., Gwynne, S., Lawrence, P.J. and Filippidis, L., Examining the effect of exit separation on aircraft evacuation performance during 90-Second certification trials using evacuation modelling techniques Aeronaut J, January 2002, 106 (1055), pp 1–16.Google Scholar
8. Galea, E.R., Finney, K., Dixon, A.J.P., Cooney, D. and Siddiqui, A. An analysis of human behaviour during aircraft evacuation situations using the AASK v3.0 database. Report 02/IM/96, ISBN 1899991 97 2, September 2002, London, GCMS Press University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
9. UK Civil Aviation Authority, Aircraft accidents dzatabase, Software V 4.3, Data Issue 15, 2002.Google Scholar
10. Owen, M., Galea, E.R. and Dixon, A.J.P., 90-second certification trial data archive report, Confidential, Prepared for the UK CAA for project 049/SRG/R&AD, March 1999.Google Scholar
11. Schaeffer, F., Passenger emergency exit usage in actual emergencies of jet airliners 1960–1989. Proceedings European Cabin Safety Conference 1990, CAP 583, pp 68–89, 1990.Google Scholar
12. Snow, C., Carroll, J.J. and Allgood, M.A., Survival in emergency escape from passenger aircraft, DOT/FAA/AM/70-16, Department of Transport, Federal Aviation Administration, 1970.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, N.R., Feinberg, W.E., and Johnston, D.M., Microstructure and Panic: The Impact of Social Bonds on Individual Action in Collective Flight From The Beverly Hills Supper Club Fire, In Disaster, Collective Behaviour and Social Organisation, Dynes, R. and Tierney, K. (Eds), pp 168–189, 1994 Delaware University Press.Google Scholar
14. FAR Part 25.807 Airworthiness Standards. Transport Category Airplanes. Including amendment 25-67 as published in the Federal Register on 16 June 1989, Washington DC, USA, 1989.Google Scholar
15. Transportation Safety Board of Canada. A Safety Study of Evacuations of Large, Passenger-Carrying Aircraft. Report number SA9501, 1995.Google Scholar