Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:16:51.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anti-impact tension control strategy for the space-tethered combination after target capture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2018

B. Wang ,
J. F. Guo ,
L. Yi  and
W. H. Zhou
B. Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical EngineeringHangzhou Dianzi UniversityHangzhouChina College of Electrical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
J. F. Guo*
Affiliation:
College of Electrical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
L. Yi
Affiliation:
College of Electrical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina Electric Power Research Institute of Guangdong Power Grid Co. Ltd.GuangzhouChina
W. H. Zhou
Affiliation:
College of Electrical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
*
gjf@zju.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An electromechanical coupling model is established for the space-tethered combination (STC) under microgravity environment after target capture by the tethered robot system (TRS). A linearized dynamic model of the STC is put forward with its controllability and observability as a control system analyzed. A double closed-loop tension control strategy is proposed to mitigate the impact and suing longitudinal vibration caused by the velocity difference between the platform and target. Experiment setup is built on a ground-based flotation platform to investigate the impact of the STC. Results of simulation and experimental validation show that the proposed tension control strategy is responsive and rapid in tension tracking and effectively prevent impact.

Keywords

Anti-impactTension controlSpace-tethered combinationTethered robot system
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1257 , November 2018 , pp. 1775 - 1787
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mankala, K.K. and Agrawal, S.K. Dynamic modeling and simulation of impact in tether net/gripper systems, Multibody System Dynamics, 2004, 11, (3), pp 235–250.Google Scholar
2. Mankala, K.K. and Agrawal, S.K. Dynamic modeling and simulation of satellite tethered systems, J of Vibration and Acoustics-Transactions of the ASME, 2005, 127, (2), pp 144–156.Google Scholar
3. Liu, H.T., Zhang, Q.B., Yang, L.P., Zhu, Y.W. and Zhang, Y.W. Dynamics of tether-tugging reorbiting with net capture, Science China Technological Sciences, 2014, 57, (12), pp 2407–2417.Google Scholar
4. Kong, X.R., Xu, D.F., Yang, Z.X. and Wang, B.L. Modeling and simulation for free deployment of a space tether system, J of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30, (05), pp 37–42.Google Scholar
5. Williams, P. In-plane payload capture with an elastic tether, J of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29, (4), pp 810–821.Google Scholar
6. Williams, P. Optimal control of tethered planetary capture missions. J of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2004, 41, (2), pp 315–319.Google Scholar
7. Huang, P.F, Wang, D.K., Meng, Z.J. and Zhang, F. Adaptive postcapture backstepping control for tumbling tethered space robot–target combination, J of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2015, 39, (1), pp 150–156.Google Scholar
8. Lu, Y.B., Huang, P.F., Meng, Z.J., Hu, Y.X., Zhang, F. and Zhang, Y.Z. Finite time attitude takeover control for combination via tethered space robot, Acta Astronautica, 2017, 136, pp 9–21.Google Scholar
9. Huang, P.F., Wang, D.K., Meng, Z.J., Zhang, F. and Liu, Z.X. Impact Dynamic Modeling And Adaptive Target Capturing Control For Tethered Space Robots With Uncertainties, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2016, 21, (5), pp 2260–2271.Google Scholar
10. Huang, P.F., Zhang, F, Cai, J.,Wang, D.K. and Meng, Z.J. Dexterous tethered space robot: design, measurement, control and experiment, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53, (3), pp 1452–1468.Google Scholar
11. Eades, J.B.J. and Wolf, H. Tethered Body Problems and Relative Motion Orbit Determinattvn, Final Report, Contract NAS5-21453, Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
12. Rupp, C.C. A tether tension control law for tethered subsatellites deployed along local vertical, Nasa Sti/recon Technical Report No. 1975.Google Scholar
13. Pradeep, S. A new tension control law for deployment of tethered satellites, Mechanics Research Communications, 1997, 24, (3), pp 247–254.Google Scholar
14. Sun, G. and Zhu, Z.H. Fractional-order tension control law for deployment of space tether system, J of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2014, 37, (6), pp 157–167.Google Scholar
15. Williams, P. Optimal deployment/retrieval of tethered satellites. J of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45, (2), 324–343.Google Scholar
16. Steindl, A. and Troger, H. Optimal control of deployment of a tethered subsatellite, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2003, 31, (3), pp 257–274.Google Scholar
17. Barkow, B., Steindl, A. and Troger, H. A targeting strategy for the deployment of a tethered satellite system, IMA J of Applied Mathematics, 2005, 70, (5), pp 626–644.Google Scholar
18. Wen, H., Jin, D.P. and Hu, H.Y. Optimal feedback control of the deployment of a tethered subsatellite subject to perturbations, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2008, 51, (4), pp 501–514.Google Scholar
19. Wen, H., Jin, D.P. and Hu, H.Y. Infinite-horizon control for retrieving a tethered subsatellite via an elastic tether, Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2008, 31, (4), pp 899–906.Google Scholar
20. Zeinoddini, M., Harding, J.E. and Parke, G.A.R. Dynamic behaviour of axially pre-loaded tubular steel members of offshore structures subjected to impact damage, Ocean Engineering, 1999, 26, (10), pp 963–978.Google Scholar
21. Jones, N. Structural Impact, 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
22. Wortmann, F.J. and Schulz, K.V. Non-linear viscoelastic performance of Nomex, Kevlar and polypropylene fibres in a single step stress relaxation test: 2. Moduli, viscosities and isochronal stress/strain curves, Polymer, 1995, 36, (12), pp 2363–2369.Google Scholar
23. Jerry, E. and Larry, H. An experimental investigation of the longitudinal dynamics of long Kevlar tethers, Proceedings of the Astrodynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1992.Google Scholar
24. Sebastian, M.S., Unnikrishnan, K.C. and Narayanan, S. Viscoelastic properties of Kevlar-29 fabric tape strength member, Mechanics of Materials, 2008, 40, (11), pp 949–960.Google Scholar
25. Krupa, M., Poth, W., Schagerl, M., Steindl, A., Steiner, W. and Troger, H. Modelling, dynamics and control of tethered satellite systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2006, 43, (1-2), pp 73–96.Google Scholar
26. Ni, Y.Q., Chen, Y., Ko, J.M. and Cao, D.Q. Neuro-control of cable vibration using semi-active magneto-rheological dampers, Engineering Structures, 2002, 24, (3), pp 295–307.Google Scholar