Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:58:09.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bending Moments in Fuselage Frames Obtained by the Photoelastic Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

P. P. Benham
P. P. Benham*
Affiliation:
Imperial College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The experimental work described in this paper, which was divided into two sections, was done to determine the usefulness of photoelasticity as a method for analysing fuselage frame problems. In the first part, a series of tests was made by the photoelastic method on models without any supporting shell, which were in equilibrium under the applied i loads, to determine the bending moment distribution in various types of frames and rings.

In all cases the theoretical bending moments were calculated from the principles of minimum strain energy. The experimental results agreed with theory to within 5 per cent, except close to the null points and joints.

The second part was devoted to shell-supported models, and the shear loads were reacted out through the skin to firm supports at the end of adjacent bays. Again the bending moments were determined for the entire frame from the isochromatic fringe pattern.

The shell-supported tests proved to be of considerable interest when compared with the theoretical curves of Ref. 4 for the corresponding relative stiffness parameters. In some cases agreement was good but in others there were marked differences. A possible reason for this was that compression effects in the skin were altering the distribution and value of the bending moments in the frame.

It was felt that there was plenty of scope for more interesting work on fuselage frame analysis, from the standpoint of shear flow determination, intermediate frame reaction, and skin-to-frame relative stiffness effects. All of these might feasibly be examined photoelastically with a certain degree of advantage over lengthy and laborious theoretical investigations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 57 , Issue 515 , November 1953 , pp. 667 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jessop, H. T. (1953). The Scope and Limitations of the Photoelastic Method of Stress Analysis. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, March 1953.Google Scholar
2. Benham, P. (1952). A Photoelastic Stress Analysis of Frames used in Aeroplane Fuselages. Research Thesis for M.Sc. degree, Queen's University, Belfast, 1952.Google Scholar
3. Ruffner, B. F. (1942). Stress Analysis of Monocoque Fuselage Bulkheads by the Photoelastic Method. N.A.C.A. T.N. 870, 1942.Google Scholar
4. Wignot, J. E., Combs, H. and Ensrud, A. F. (1944). Analysis of Circular Shell Supported Frames. N.A.C.A. T.N. 929, 1944.Google Scholar
5. Becker, H. (1946). Photoelastic Analysis of a Spar Bulkhead in a Semi-monocoque Airplane Fuselage. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Stress Analysis, Vol. IV, No. 1, 1946.Google Scholar
6. Fisher, W. A. P. (1948). Photoelastic Analysis of Symmetrical Rings under the Action of Applied Couples. Unpublished M.O.S. Report.Google Scholar
7. Goodey, W. J. (1946). Stresses in a Circular Fuselage. Royal Aeronautical Society Journal, November 1946.Google Scholar
8. Frocht, M. M. (1948). Photoelasticity. Vols. I and II. John Wiley, 1948.Google Scholar
9. Hetenyi, M. (1950). Handbook of Experimental Stress Analysis. John Wiley, 1950.Google Scholar