Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:59:32.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehensive multibody dynamics analysis for rotor aeromechanics predictions in descending flight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

J.-S. Park  and
S. N. Jung
J.-S. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Information Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea
S. N. Jung*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Information Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea
*
snjung@konkuk.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the rotor aeromechanics in descending flight using a nonlinear flexible multibody dynamic analysis code, DYMORE. A freewake model is included in DYMORE to improve the rotor wake modelling. The wind-tunnel test data of the Higher-harmonic Aeroacoustics Rotor Test (HART) II rotor, with and without higher harmonic pitch control (HHC), and the flight test data of the full-scale utility helicopter rotor in descent are used for the aeromechanics correlation at an advance ratio of 0·15. The blade-vortex interaction (BVI) airloads are reasonably predicted for both the HART II and utility helicopter rotors, although some BVI peaks are missed on the advancing sides for both the rotors. The flap deflections and elastic torsion deformations at the blade tip are fairly correlated against the measured data of the HART II rotor. The correlation of blade structural moments for both HART II and utility helicopter rotors are not as good as the lift predictions; however, a reasonable prediction is obtained for the utility helicopter rotor.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 116 , Issue 1177 , March 2012 , pp. 229 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kufeld, R.M., Balough, D.L., Cross, J.L., Studebaker, K.F., Jennison, C.D. and Bousman, W.G. Flight testing the UH-60A Airloads Aircraft, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 50th Annual Forum, 1994.Google Scholar
2. Yu, Y.-H., Gmelin, B., Heller, H., Phillippe, J.J., Mercker, E. and Preisser, J.S. HHC aeroacoustics rotor test at the DNW – The joint German/French/US HART project, Proceedings of 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Yu, Y.-H., Tung, C., van der Wall, B.G., Pausder, H.-J., Burley, C., Brooks, T., Beaumier, P., Delrieux, Y., Mercker, E. and Pengel, K. The HART-II test: rotor wakes aeroacoustics with Higher-Harmonic pitch Control (HHC) inputs – The joint German/French/Dutch/US project, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 58th Annual Forum, 2002.Google Scholar
4. Norman, T.R., Shinoda, P.M., Kitaplioglu, C., Jacklin, S.A. and Sheikman, A. Low-speed windtunnel investigation of a full-scale UH-60 rotor system, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 58th Annual Forum, 2002.Google Scholar
5. Yeo, H.-S., Romander, E.A. and Norman, T.R. Investigation of rotor performance and loads of a UH-60A individual blade control system, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum, 2010.Google Scholar
6. Van der Wall, B.G. 2nd HHC Aeroacoustic rotor test (HART II) – Part II: Representation results, Institute Report IB 111-2005/03, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Braunschwieg, Germany, 2005.Google Scholar
7. Lim, J.-W. and van der Wall, B.G. Investigation of the effect of a multiple trailer wake model for descending flights, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 61st Annual Forum, 2005.Google Scholar
8. Sa, J.-H., Kim, J.-W., Park, S.-H., Park, J.-S., Jung, S.N. and Yu, Y.-H. KFLOW results of airloads on HART-II rotor blades with prescribed blade deformation, Proceedings of 2nd International Forum on Rotorcraft Multidisciplinary Technology, 2009.Google Scholar
9. Lim, J.-W., Nygaard, T.A., Strawn, R. and Potsdam, M. BVI airloads prediction using CFD/CSD loose coupling, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 4th Vertical Lift Aircraft Design Conference, 2006.Google Scholar
10. Lim, J.-W. An assessment of rotor dynamics correlation for descending flight using CSD/CFD coupled analysis, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum, 2008.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, W. CAMRAD II, comprehensive analytical model of rotorcraft aerodynamics and dynamics, Johnson Aeronautics, 1992.Google Scholar
12. Bauchau, O.A. DYMORE manual (version 2.0): http://soliton.ae.gatech.edu/people/ obauchau/Dwnld/dymore20/DymoreManual.pdf.Google Scholar
13. Mantegazza, P. MBDYN: http://www.aero.polimi.it/~mbdyn.Google Scholar
14. Shin, S.-J. Integral Twist Aactuation of Helicopter Rotor Blades for Vibration Reduction, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.Google Scholar
15. Roget, B. Simulation of active twist and active flap control on a model-scale helicopter rotor, Proceedings of 24th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2006.Google Scholar
16. Park, J.-S., Jung, S., Park, S.-H. and Yu, Y.-H. Correlation study of a rotor in descending flight using DYMORE with a freewake mode, J Mechanical Science and Technology, 2010, 24, (8), pp 1583–1594.Google Scholar
17. Shen, J., Masarati, P., Roget, B., Piatak, D.J., Nixon, M.W. and Singleton, J.D. Stiff-inplane tiltrotor aeromechanics investigation using two multibody analyses, Proceedings of Multibody Dynamics, 2007.Google Scholar
18. Hodges, D.H. A mixed variational formulation based on exact intrinsic equations for dynamics of moving beams, Int J Solids and Structures, 1990, 26, (11), pp 1253–1273.Google Scholar
19. Peters, D.A. and He, C.J. Finite state induced flow models Part II: Three-dimensional rotor disk, J Aircr, 1995, 32, (2), pp 323–333.Google Scholar
20 Bhagwat, M.J. and Leishman, J.G. Stability, consistency and convergence of time-marching free-vortex rotor wake algorithms, J American Helicopter Society, 2001, 46, (1), pp 59–71.Google Scholar
21. Van der Wall, B.G. 2nd HHC Aeroacoustic rotor test (HART II) – Part I: Test document-, Institute Report IB 111-2003/31, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Braunschwieg, Germany, 2003.Google Scholar
22. Howlett, J.J. UH-60A Black Hawk engineering simulation program: volume I – mathematical model, NASA Contractor Report 166309, 1981.Google Scholar
23. Davis, S.J. Predesign Study for a modern 4-bladed rotor for the RSRA, NASA Contractor Report 166155, 1981.Google Scholar
24. Bauchau, O.A. and Liu, H. On the modelling of hydraulic components in rotorcraft systems, J American Helicopter Society, 2006, 51, (2), pp 175–184.Google Scholar
25. Welsh, W. Simulation and correlation of a helicopter air-oil strut dynamic response, Proceedings of American Helicopter Society 43rd Annual Forum, 1988.Google Scholar
26. Datta, A. Fundamental Understanding, Prediction and Validation of Rotor Vibratory Loads in Steady Level Flight, PhD thesis, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
27. Flemming, R.J. An Experimental Evaluation of Advanced Rotorcraft Airfoils in the NASA Ames Eleven-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel, NASA Contractor Report 166587, 1984.Google Scholar
28. Mayda, E.A. A CFD-Based Methodology to Automate the Generation of C81 Airfoil Performance Tables, MS thesis, University of California, Davis, USA, 2003.Google Scholar
29. Van Riper, S.G. Investigation of Increased Forward Flight Velocities of Helicopters Using Higher Harmonic Stall Control and Reverse Velocity Rotor Concept, MS thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2003.Google Scholar
30 Sitaraman, J. CFD Based Unsteady Aerodynamic Modelling for Rotor Aeroelastic Analysis, PhD thesis, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
31. Navarrete, J. Construction of Airfoil Performance Tables by the Fusion of Experimental and Numerical Data, MS thesis, Rice University, 2004.Google Scholar
32. Abras, J.N. Enhancement of Aeroelastic Rotor Airloads Prediction Methods, PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA, 2009.Google Scholar
33. Squire, H.B. The growth of a vortex in turbulent flow, Aeronaut Quarterly, 1965, 16, pp 302–306.Google Scholar
34. Ramasamy, M. and Leishman, J.G. Reynolds number based blade tip vortex model, Proceedings of American Helicopter Society 61st Annual Forum, 2005.Google Scholar
35. Ho, J.C., Yeo, H.-S. and Ormiston, R.A. Investigation of rotor blade structural dynamics and modelling based on measured airloads, J Aircr, 2008, 45, (5), pp 1631–1642.Google Scholar