Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:19:52.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current problems of flight simulators for research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

K. J. Staples
K. J. Staples*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Barnes has said ‘simulation is like a meal in a restaurant —more depends on the way it is prepared and served than on the basic ingredients'. We know a good deal about the ingredients, the hardware, of the simulator meal but we are not yet particularly good cooks. The lore of cooking has largely been obtained by ad hoc experiments, and at its highest expression is an art; the same is still true, in the main, of simulation techniques. Simulation should come of age. The precocious youngster grew up relatively undisciplined using the sledge-hammer of technology in an endeavour to produce a ground-borne aeroplane, with little science used in identifying the requirements.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 82 , Issue 805 , January 1978 , pp. 12 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barnes, A. G. Objectives of simulation, AGARD-CP-79-70, January 1971.Google Scholar
2. Staples, K. J. Motion, visual and aural cues in piloted flight simulation. AGARD-CP-79-70, January 1971.Google Scholar
3. Staples, K. J. Piloted flight simulation—the Aero Flight facilities and some thoughts for the future. ARC 35549, September 1974.Google Scholar
4. Davies, D. P. Approval of flight simulator flying qualities. The Aeronautical Journal, July 1975.Google Scholar
5. Tomlinson, B. N. and Wilcock, T. Further piloted simulation studies of the handling characteristics of a slender-wing supersonic transport aircraft during ap proach and landing. ARC R&M No 3660, January 1969.Google Scholar
6. Pinsker, W. J. G. The landing flare of large transport aircraft. ARC R&M No 3602, November 1967.Google Scholar
7. Cooper, G. E. and Harper, R. P. Jr. The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. AGARD Report No 567, June 1969.Google Scholar
8. Tait, D. R. The next generation of visual systems, RAeS Symposium, Flight Training Simulators for the ‘70s, October 1970.Google Scholar
9. Armstrong, B. D. Flight trials to discover whether peripheral vision is needed for landing. RAE Tech Report No 70205, November 1970.Google Scholar
10. Junkers, A. M. and Price, D. Comparison between a peripheral display and motion information of human tracking about the roll axis. AIAA Visual and Motion Stimulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
11. Whybray, E. D. Development of the Flight Systems Department weapon aiming simulator. RAE Tech Report No 75125, October 1975.Google Scholar
12. Chase, W. D. Effect of colour on pilot performance and transfer functions using a full-spectrum, calligraphic, color display system. AIAA Visual & Motion Simulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
13. Stratton, G. M. A mirror pseudoscope and the limits of visible depth. Psychological Review, 1898.Google Scholar
14. Palmer, E. P. and Petitt, J. Visual space perception on a computer graphics night visual attachment. AIAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
15. Barnes, A. G. The effect of visual threshold on aircraft control with particular reference to approach and flare simulation. AIAA Paper No 70-357, September 1970.Google Scholar
16. Miller, G. K. Jr. and Riley, D. R. The effect of visual-motion time delays on pilot performance in a pursuit tracking task. AIAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
17. Palmer, E. and Petitt, J. Difference thresholds for judgements of sink rate during the flare. AIAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
18. Penwill, J. C. and Packwood, R. J. Digitally generated outside world display of lighting pattern used in conjunction with an aircraft simulator. AGARD CP-198, June 1976.Google Scholar
19. Mcpherson, A. A piloted simulator study of a slender wing research aircraft (HP 115). ARC R&M 3614, March 1968.Google Scholar
20. Stark, E. A. Motion perception and terrain visual cues in air combat simulation. AIAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
21. Nashner, L. M. Sensory feedback in human posture control. MIT MVT-70-3, June 1970.Google Scholar
22. Perry, D. H. and Mcpherson, A. A flight simulator study of the handling characteristics of a slender wing supersonic transport aircraft at landing approach speeds. ARC R&M 3616, August 1966.Google Scholar
23. Perry, D. H. and Naish, J. M. Flight Simulation for research. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1964.Google Scholar
24. Meiry, J. L. The vestibular system and human dynamic space orientation, MIT. MVT-65-1, 1965.Google Scholar
25. Gundry, J. Man and motion cues. RAeS Symposium, Theory and practice in flight simulation, April 1976.Google Scholar
26. Parrish, R. V. and Rollins, J. D. Visual/motion simulation of CTOL flare and touchdown comparing data obtained from two model board display systems. AIAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, April 1976.Google Scholar
27. Cummings, T. J. The quantitative assessment of aircraft simulator pitch motion systems, Queens University of Belfast, Thesis. July 1975.Google Scholar
28. Ektn, W. H. Private communication, Queens University of Belfast, October 1975.Google Scholar
29. Bray, R. S. Vertical motion requirements for landing simulation. NASA Tech Memo X62236, August 1972. (See also AGARD Report No 632, October 1975.)Google Scholar
30. Bray, R. S. The influence of motion on the effectiveness of flight simulators in training manoeuvres, NASA SP-270.Google Scholar
31. Lipscombe, J. M. and Lewis, D. J. G. Feel force system with an inertia reduction capability. AGARD CP-198, June 1976.Google Scholar
32. Tomlinson, B. N. Developments in the simulation of atmospheric turbulence. AGARD CP-198, June 1976.Google Scholar
33. Von de moesdijk, G. A. J. Simulation of patchy atmo spheric turbulence, based on measurements of actual turbulence. AGARD CP-198, June 1976.Google Scholar
34. Reeves, P. M. et al. Development and application of a non-Gaussian atmospheric turbulence model for use in flight simulators. NASA CR-2451, September 1974.Google Scholar