Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:29:24.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The determination of realistic probability levels for project completion dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. Mitchell  and
M. J. Willis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since our national economy depends, to an extent, on the successful completion of the design, marketing and selling of major industrial projects, one sees more exacting demands placed on the completion of these projects on time. For example we have seen the advent of increased Ministerial requirements on the estimations of development costs and programmes with the subsequent stricter control of the costs and programmes of advanced technological projects. In order to facilitate the implementation of the requirements specified in the Downey Report, and in particular, industry's own monitoring and programming, we have seen the development of network analysis management techniques.

Projects having slipped several months or even years tend to incur escalated costs and consequently one sees a loss in overall profit, lost future orders, etc. It would be more than useful, therefore to estimate a probability function of completing a project by a specified date in order that more realistic planning can be executed.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 77 , Issue 756 , December 1973 , pp. 620 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Malcom, , Roseboom, , Clark, and Fazar, . Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation. Operations Research 7/646, 1959.Google Scholar
2. Battersby, A. Network analysis. Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
3. Pearson, E. S. and Johnson, N. L. Tables of the incom plete Beta-function. Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
4. Kendall, M. G. and Babington Smith, B., Tables of random sampling numbers. Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
5. Moder, J. J. and Phillips, C. R. Project management with CPM and PERT. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1964.Google Scholar
6. Downey, W. G. Report of the steering group on develop ment cost estimating, Vols 1 and 2. HMSO, 1969.Google Scholar