Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:09:36.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the aerofoil thickness on the performance of the MAV scale cycloidal rotor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

Y. Hu ,
H.L. Zhang  and
C. Tan
H.L. Zhang
Affiliation:
School of aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnic University, Xi’an, Shan Xi, China
C. Tan
Affiliation:
School of aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnic University, Xi’an, Shan Xi, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The numerical simulations for cycloidal propellers based on five aerofoils with different thickness are presented in this paper. The CFD simulation is based on sliding mesh and URANS. The results of CFD simulation indicates that all test cases share similar flow pattern. There are leading edge vortex and trailing-edge vortex due to blade dynamic stall. Interaction between the vortices shed from upstream blade and the downstream blade can be observed. There is variation of blade relative inflow velocity due to downwash in the cycloidal rotor cage. These factors result in large fluctuations of the aerodynamics forces on the blade. The comparison of the forces and flow pattern indicates that the thickness and leading edge radius of the aerofoil can significantly influent the flow pattern and hence the performance of the cycloidal propeller.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 119 , Issue 1213 , March 2015 , pp. 343 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gil, I and Yuvaval, L. Aerodynamics of the Cyclogiro, AIAA 2003-3473.Google Scholar
2.Gil, I and Yuvaval, L.Experimental and numerical study of Cyclogiro aerodynamics, AIAA J, 2006, 44, (12), pp 2866–2870.Google Scholar
3.Seung, J.K., Chul, Y.Y. and Daesung, K. Design and Performance Tests of Cycloidal Propulsion Systems, AIAA 2003-1786.Google Scholar
4.In, S.H., Seung, Y.M. and Min, K.K.et al Multidisciplinary Optimal Design of Cyclocopter Blade System. AIAA 2005.Google Scholar
5.In, S.H., Chang, S.H. and Seung, J.K. Structural Design of Cyclocopter Blade System, AIAA 2005-2020.Google Scholar
6.In, S.H., Seung, Y.M. and Choon, H.L.Development of a four-rotor cyclocopter, J Aircraft, 2008, 45, (6).Google Scholar
7.Benedict, M., Chopra, I., Ramasamy, M. and Leishman, J.G.Experimental investigation of the cycloidal rotor for a Hovering Micro Air Vehicle, Proceedings of the 64th Annual National Forum of the American-Helicopter Society, Montreal, Canada, 28-30 April 2008.Google Scholar
8.Benedict, M., Chopra, I., Ramasamy, M. and Leishman, J.G.Experiments on the Optimization of the MAV-Scale Cycloidal Rotor Characteristics Towards Improving Their Aerodynamic Performance, Proceedings of the International Specialists Meeting on Unmanned Rotorcraft, Scottsdale, AZ, 20-22 January 2009.Google Scholar
9.Benedict, M and Inderjit, C.Aeroelastic analysis of a micro-air-vehicle-scale cycloidal rotor in hover, AIAA J, 2011, 49, (11).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Benedict, M., Manikanda, N.R. and Inderjit, A.C.Improving the aerodynamic performance of micro-air-vehicle-scale cycloidal rotor: an experimental approach, AIAA J, 2010, 47, (4).Google Scholar
11.Jarugumilli, T., Benedict, M. and Chopra, I. Experimental Optimization and Performance Analysis of a MAV Scale Cycloidal Rotor, AIAA 2011-821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Benedict, M., Gupta, R. and Inderjit, C.Design, Development and Flight Testing of a Twin-Rotor Cyclocopter Micro Air Vehicle, Proceedings of the 67th Annual National Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 3-5 May, 2011.Google Scholar
13.Benedict, M., Teja swi, J. and Inderjit, C.Effect of rotor geometry and blade kinematics on cycloidal rotor hover performance, J Aircraft, September-October 2013, 50, (5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Benedict, M., Teja swi, J., Vinod, L. and Inderjit, C.Effect of flow curvature on forward flight performance of a micro-air-vehicle-scale cycloidal-rotor, AIAA J, June 2014, 52, (6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Benedict, M., Elena, S., Vikram, H. and Inderjit, C.Development of a micro twin-rotor cyclocopter capable of autonomous hover, J Aircraft, March-April 2014, 51, (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kan, Y.Aerodynamic Analysis of an MAV-Scale Cycloidal Rotor System Using a Structured Overset RANS Solver, Thesis for the degree of Master of Science, 2010.Google Scholar
17.Hu, Y., Lim, K.B. and Hu, W.R. The research on the performance of cyclogyro, AIAA 2006-7704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hu, Y. and Du, F. Two dimensional numerical simulation of cycloidal propellers with flat plate aerofoil in hovering status, AIAA 2013-4244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Du, F. and Hu, Y. The simulation and analysis of the roll stability of the three-rotor Cyclogyro, AIAA 2013-4219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Shengyi, W., Derek, B.I. and Lin, M.Numerical investigation on dynamic stall of low Reynolds number flow around oscillating aerofoils, Computers and Fluids, 2010, 39, pp 1529–1541.Google Scholar
21.Shengyi, W., Derek, B.I. and Lin, M.Mohamed, P. and Zhi, T.Turbulence modeling of deep dynamic stall at relativelty low Reynolds number, J Fluids and Structure, 33, 2012, pp 191–209.Google Scholar
22.Nobile, R. and VahdatI, M. I, M.Dynamic stall for a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine in a two-dimentional study, World Renewable Energy Congress 2011, Sweden, 8-13 May 2011.Google Scholar
23.Fluent, I. Fluent 6.3 user’s guide, Fluent documentation.Google Scholar
24.Leishman, J.G.Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.Google Scholar