Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:36:12.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental and computational study of unsteady hypersonic cavity flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

S. Creighton  and
R. Hillier
S. Creighton
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, UK
R. Hillier
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a combined experimental and computational study of annular cavities on a semi-angle cone in a Mach 8·9 flow. A range of cavity length-to-depth ratios has been considered, and a parameter has been determined that distinguishes between ‘weak oscillations’ and ‘strong oscillations’ of the cavity flow. Essentially the work identifies the transition from the case where the flow can be regarded as ‘pure cavity flow’ to that where the flow behaviour is tending towards that of a ‘spiked blunt body’. The CFD simulations also suggest that, for a certain range of cavity scale, the limiting cavity flow state depends upon the flow initialisation process; it may be weak or strongly oscillating.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1125 , November 2007 , pp. 673 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Krishnamurty, K. Acoustic radiation from two-dimensional rectangular cutouts in aerodynamic surfaces, NACA TM 3487, August 1955.Google Scholar
2. Charwat, A.F., Roos, J.N., Dewey, F.C. and Hitz, J.N.. An Investigation of separated flows, J Aero Sci, 1961, 28, (6).Google Scholar
3. Rossiter, B.. Wind Tunnel Measurements on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and Transonic speeds, Ministry of Aviation, Aeronautical research council, London, 1966.Google Scholar
4. Heller, H.H. and Bliss, D.B.. The Physical mechanisms of Flow-Induced Pressure Fluctuations in Cavities and concepts for their suppression, AIAA Paper-1975-471, 1975.Google Scholar
5. Nicoll, K.M.. A Study of laminar hypersonic cavity flows, 1964, AIAA J, 2, (9), 1535–1541.Google Scholar
6. Hahn, M.. Experimental investigation of separated flow over a cavity at hypersonic speed, AIAA Paper 68-672. 1968.Google Scholar
7. Sarohia, V.. Experimental investigation of oscillations in flows over shallow cavities, AIAA J, 1976, 15, 7, 984–991.Google Scholar
8. Rockwell, D. and Kinsely, C.. The organized nature of flow impingement upon a corner, J Fluid Mech, 1979, 93, Part 3, 413–432.Google Scholar
9. Nestler, D.E.. Heat transfer to steps and cavities in hypersonic turbulent flow, AIAA J, July 1969, 7, (7).Google Scholar
10. Nestler, D.E.. An experimental study of hypersonic cavity flow, J Spacecraft and Rockets, June 1982, 19, (3).Google Scholar
11. Rockwell, D. and Naudascher, E.. Review – Self-Sustaining Oscillations of flows past cavities, J Fluid Mech, 1978, 100, pp 152–165.Google Scholar
12. Hankey, W.L. and Shang, J.S.. Analyses of pressure oscillations in an open cavity, AIAA J, 1980, 18, (8), pp 892–898.Google Scholar
13. Dusing, D.W., Fox, C.W., Tam, C., Orkwis, P.D. and Disimile, P.J.. An experimental and computational study of unsteady supersonic 2-D open cavity flow physics, 1994, AIAA Paper 94-0528.Google Scholar
14. Orkwis, P.D. and Disimile, P.J.. The effect of yaw angle on the dominant frequencies of rectangular cavities in supersonic flow, Rept. 96-010, Dept of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1996.Google Scholar
15. Tam, C., Orkwis, P.D. and Disimile, P.J.. Comparison of Baldwin-Lomax turbulence models for two-dimensional open cavity computations, AIAA J, 1996, 34, (3), pp 629–631.Google Scholar
16. Tam, C., Orkwis, P.D. and Disimile, P.J.. Algebraic turbulence model simulations of supersonic open-cavity flow physics, AIAA J, 1996, 34, (11), pp 2255–2260.Google Scholar
17. Morgenstern, A. and Chokani, N.. Computation of hypersonic open cavity flows, AIAA Paper 93-2969, 1993.Google Scholar
18. Morgenstern, A. and Chokani, N.. Computation of hypersonic flow over three-dimensional cavity, AIAA Paper 94-0631, 1993.Google Scholar
19. Morgenstern, A. and Chokani, N.. Prediction of hypersonic cavity flow dynamics, AIAA Paper 99-0171, 1999.Google Scholar
20. Colonius, T., Basu, A.J. and Rowley, C.W.. Numerical investigation of flow past a cavity, AIAA Paper 99-1912, 1999.Google Scholar
21. Sturgess, G.J. and Hsu, K-Y.. Entrainment of mainstream flow in a trapped-vortex combustor, AIAA Paper 97-0261, 1997.Google Scholar
22. Bowersox, R.D.W. and Davis, D.L.. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cavity flame holders for scramjets, 1997, AIAA Paper 97-3270.Google Scholar
23. Edwards, J.A., Rona, A. and Zhang, X.. The effect of trailing edge geometry on cavity flow oscillation and pressure feedback, Aeronaut J, 1998, 102, (1013), pp 129–136.Google Scholar
24. Jackson, A.P., Hillier, R. and Soltani, S.. Experimental and computational study of laminar cavity flows at hypersonic speeds, J Fluid Mech, 2001, 427, pp 329–358.Google Scholar
25. Bellone, F. and Stollery, J.L.. Cone cavity flow at M = 8·2 with injection of air and helium, Aeronaut J, 1999, 103, (1029), pp 529–535.Google Scholar
26. Cook, W.J. and Felderman, E.J.. Reduction of data from thin-film heat-transfer gauges: a concise numerical technique, AIAA J, 1966, 4, (4), pp 561–562.Google Scholar
27. Schultz, D.L. and Jones, T.V.. Heat-transfer measurements in short-duration hypersonic facilities, AGARDograph, 165, 1973.Google Scholar
28. Hillier, R., Kirk, D. and Soltani, S.. Navier-Stokes computations of hypersonic flows, Int J Num Meth Heat and Fluid Flow, 1995, 5, pp 195–211.Google Scholar
29. Ben-Artzi, M. and Falcovitz, J.. A second-order Godunov-type scheme for compressible fluid dynamics, J Comp Phys, 1984, 55, pp 1–32.Google Scholar
30. Keyes, F.G.. The heat conductivity, viscosity, specific heat and Prandtl numbers for thirteen gases, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, Project Squid, Tech Report 37, 1952.Google Scholar
31. Zanchetta, M.A. and Hillier, R.. Blunt Cone Transition At Hypersonic Speeds: The Transition Reversal Regime, In Transitional Boundary Layers in Aeronautics. Henkes, R.A.W.M. and Van Ingen, J.L. (Eds), North-Holland. 1996.Google Scholar
32. Mallinson, S.G., Jackson, A.P., Hillier, R., Kirk, D.C., Soltani, S. and Zanchetta, M.. Gun tunnel flow calibration: defining input conditions for hypersonic flow computations, Shock Waves, 2000, 10, pp 313–322.Google Scholar
33. Fernholz, H.H. and Finley, P.J.. A critical compilation of compressible turbulent boundary layer data, AGARDograph 223, 1977.Google Scholar
34. Feszty, D., Badcock, K.J. and Richards, B.E.. Utilising CFD in the investigation of high-speed unsteady spiked body flows, The Aeronaut J,Google Scholar