Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:37:35.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A fast procedure for the design of composite stiffened panels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

C. Bisagni  and
R. Vescovini
R. Vescovini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the analysis and the minimum weight optimisation of a fuselage composite stiffened panel made from carbon/epoxy material and stiffened by five omega stringers. The panel investigated inside the European project MAAXIMUS is studied using a fast tool, which relies on a semi-analytical procedure for the analysis and on genetic algorithms for the optimisation. The semi-analytical approach is used to compute the buckling load and to study the post-buckling response. Different design variables are considered during the optimisation, such as the stacking sequences of the skin and the stiffener, the geometry and the cross-section of the stiffener. The comparison between finite element and fast tool results reveals the ability of the formulation to predict the buckling load and the post-buckling response of the panel. The reduced CPU time necessary for the analysis and the optimisation makes the procedure an attractive strategy to improve the effectiveness of the preliminary design phases.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 119 , Issue 1212 , February 2015 , pp. 185 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lynch, C., Murphy, A., Price, M. and Gibson, A.The computational post buckling analysis of fuselage stiffened panels loaded in compression, Thin-Walled Structures, 2004, 41, (10), pp 1445–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Linde, P., Schulz, A. and Rust, W.Infuence of modelling and solution methods on the FE-simulation of the post-buckling behaviour of stiffened aircraft fuselage panels, Composite Structures, 2006, 73, (2), pp 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Le Tallec, P.Domain decomposition methods in computational mechanics, Computational Mechanics Advances, 1994, 1, (2), pp 121–220.Google Scholar
4.Cresta, P., Allix, O., Rey, C. and Guinard, S.Nonlinear localization strategies for domain decomposition methods: application to post-buckling analyses, Computer Methods in Applied Mech and Eng, 2007, 196, (8), pp 1436–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Almroth, B.O., Stern, P. and Brogan, F.A.Automatic choice of global shape functions in structural analysis, AIAA J, 1978, 16, (5), pp 525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Noor, A.K. and Peters, J.M.Reduced basis technique for nonlinear analysis of structures, AIAA J, 1980, 18, (4), pp 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Barrière, L., Marguet, S., Castainié, B., Cresta, P. and Passieux, J.-C.An adaptive model reduction strategy for post-buckling analysis of stiffened structures, Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 73, (0), pp 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Little, G.H.An efficient computer program for the large defection analysis of rectangular orthotropic plates, Computers & Structures, 1987, 27, (4), pp 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Weaver, P.M.Approximate analysis for buckling of compression loaded long rectangular plates with fexural/twist anisotropy, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Eng Sci, 2006, 462, (2065), pp 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pevzner, P., Abramovich, H. and Weller, T.Calculation of the collapse load of an axially compressed laminated composite stringer-stiffened curved panel — an engineering approach, Composite Structures, 2008, 83, (4), pp 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Quatmann, M. and Reimerdes, H.G.Computationally efficient analysis of the postbuckling behaviour of stiffened fuselage sections, 2012, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, AIAA-2012-1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Paik, J. and Thayamballi, A.Buckling strength of steel plating with elastically restrained edges, Thin-Walled Structures, 2000, 37, (1), pp 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Qiao, P. and Shan, L.Explicit local buckling analysis and design of fiber-reinforced plastic composite structural shapes, Composite Structures, 2005, 70, (4), pp 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Bisagni, C. and Vescovini, R.Analytical formulation for local buckling and post-buckling analysis of stiffened laminated panels, Thin-Walled Structures, 2009, 47, (3), pp 318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Fujikubo, M. and Yao, T.Elastic local buckling strength of stiffened plate considering plate/stiffener interaction and welding residual stress, Marine Structures, 1999, 12, (9-10), pp 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Byklum, E. and Amdahl, J.A simplified method for elastic large defection analysis of plates and stiffened panels due to local buckling, Thin-Walled Structures, 2002, 40, (11), pp 925–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Buermann, P., Rolfes, R., Tessmer, J. and Schagerl, M.A semi-analytical model for local post-buckling analysis of stringer- and frame-stiffened cylindrical panels, Thin-Walled Structures, 2006, 44, (1), pp 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Brubak, L. and Hellesland, J.Semi-analytical postbuckling and strength analysis of arbitrarily stiffened plates in local and global bending, Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45, (6), pp 620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Mittelstedt, C.Closed-form analysis of the buckling loads of uniaxially loaded blade-stringer-stiffened composite plates considering periodic boundary conditions, Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45, (4), pp 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Vescovini, R. and Bisagni, C.Buckling analysis and optimization of stiffened composite fat and curved panels, AIAA J, 2012, 50, (4), pp 904–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Bisagni, B. and Lanzi, L.Post-buckling optimisation of composite stiffened panels using neural networks, Composite Structures, 2002, 58, (2), pp 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Murugan, M.S., Ganguli, R. and Harursampath, D.Surrogate based design optimisation of composite aerofoil cross-section for helicopter vibration reduction, Aeronautical J, 2012, 116, (1181), pp 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Bushnell, D.Optimum design of composite stiffened panels under combined loading, Computers & Structures, 1995, 55, (5), pp 819–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Kennedy, D. and Featherston, C.A.Exact strip analysis and optimum design of aerospace structures, Aeronautical J, 2010, 114, (1158), pp 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Diaconu, C. and Weaver, P.M.Approximate solution and optimum design of compression-loaded, postbuckled laminated composite plates, AIAA J, 2005, 43, (4), pp 906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Herencia, J., Weaver, P.M. and Friswell, M.Optimization of long anisotropic laminated fiber composite panels with T-shaped stiffeners, AIAA J, 2007, 45, (10), pp 2497–2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. MAAXIMUS Project website. http://www.maaximus.eu.Google Scholar
28.Vescovini, R. and Bisagni, C.Two-step procedure for fast post-buckling analysis of composite stiffened panels, Computers & Structures, 2013, 128, pp 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Hyer, M.Stress Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials, 1998, pp 235–252, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
30.Reddy, J.Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells: Theory and Analysis, 2004, pp 112–131. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
31.Falzon, B. and Steven, G.Buckling mode transition in hat-stiffened composite panels loaded in uniaxial compression, Composite Structures, 1997, 37, (2), pp 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Nagendra, S., Jestin, |D., Gürdal, Z., Haftka, R. and Watson, L.Improved genetic algorithm for the design of stiffened composite panels, Computers & Structures, 1996, 58, (3), pp 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Soremekun, G., Gürdal, Z., Haftka, R. and Watson, L.Composite laminate design optimization by genetic algorithm with generalized elitist selection, Computers & Structures, 2001, 2, (79), pp 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Faggiani, A. and Falzon, B.Optimization strategy for minimizing damage in postbuckling stiffened panels, AIAA J, 2007, 45, (10), pp 2520–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Abaqus version 6.13 User’s manual 2013, SIMULIA, World Headquarters, Providence, RI, USA.Google Scholar
36.Irisarri, F., Bassir, D., Carrere, N. and Maire, J.Multiobjective stacking sequence optimization for laminated composite structures, Composites Science and Technology, 2009, 69, (7-8), pp 983–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar