Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:55:14.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flight simulation - past, present and future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. J. Allerton
D. J. Allerton*
Affiliation:
College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines the development of flight simulators used in civil training, military training and in engineering simulation. It describes the evolution of flight simulators and the typical architecture of a modern flight simulator. The technical innovations, which have occurred in modelling, motion systems and visual systems are reviewed. The paper also reviews the transfer of training in flight simulation, the application of simulation to engineering design and outlines problems which are encountered in flight simulation. The paper concludes by reviewing the current trends in flight simulation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 104 , Issue 1042 , December 2000 , pp. 651 - 663
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haber, R.N. Flight simulation, Sci American, July 1986.Google Scholar
2. Fischetti, M. (Ed) Simulating ‘the right stuff’, IEEE Spectrum, March 1985.Google Scholar
3. Morrison, R.H. Lessons learned from a historical review of piloted aircraft simulations, Flight simulation and technologies AIAA conference, AIAA-93-3547-CP, Monterey, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Adorian, P., Staynes, W. and Bolton, M. The evolution of the flight simulator, Fifty years of flight simulation RAeS conference, London, 1979.Google Scholar
5. Allen, L. Evolution of flight simulation, Flight simulation and technologies AIAA conference, AIAA-93-3545-CP, Monterey, 1993.Google Scholar
6. Rolfe, J.M. and Staples, K.J. Flight Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
7. Haward, D.M. The Sanders teacher, Flight, 1910,10.Google Scholar
8. Rolfe, J.M. and Bolton, M. Flight simulation in the Royal Air Force in the Second World War, Aeronaut J, October l988, 92, (913), pp 315–327.Google Scholar
9. Dunn, W.H., Eldert, C. and Levonian, P.V. A digital computer for use in an operational flight trainer, IRE Trans Electronic Computers, 1955.Google Scholar
10. Stewart, D.A platform with six-degrees-of-freedom, Proc Inst of Mechanical Engineers, 1965,180, Part 1, (5), pp 371–386.Google Scholar
11. Barretts, R.E. Flight simulator visual systems - an overview, Aerospace technology SAE conference, Long Beach, October 1986.Google Scholar
12. Blackman, G.H. A review of display systems for flight simulation, Flight simulation technology, capability and benefits RAeS conference, London, 1995.Google Scholar
13. Anon International Standards for the Qualification of Airplane Flight Simulators, Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 1996.Google Scholar
14. Mcfarland, R.E. A standard kinematic model for flight simulation at NASA-Ames, NASA CR-2497, 1975.Google Scholar
15. Fogarty, L.E. and Howe, R.M. Computer mechanisation of six degree of freedom equations, NASA CR-1344, 1969.Google Scholar
16. Anon The equations of motion of a rigid aircraft, ESDU Item 67003, 1966.Google Scholar
17. Anon Characteristics of flight simulator visual systems, NATO AGARD Advisory Report No 164, 1981.Google Scholar
18. Mcfarland, R.E. Transport delay compensation for computer generated imagery systems, NASA TM-10084, 1988.Google Scholar
19. White, A.D. G-seat heave motion cueing for improved handling in helicopters, Flight simulation technologies AIAA conference, Boston, 1989.Google Scholar
20. Ashworth, W.R., Mckissick, B.T. and Parrish, R.V. Effects of motion base and g-seat cueing on simulator pilot performance, NASA tech paper No 2247, 1984.Google Scholar
21. Allerton, D.J. A distributed approach to the design of a real-time engineering flight simulator, 21st ICAS congress, Melbourne, 1998.Google Scholar
22. Baarspul, M. A review of flight simulation techniques. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1990, 22, pp 1–120.Google Scholar
23. Cardullo, F.M., Kaczmarck, and Waycechowsky, , A comparison of several numerical integration algorithms employed in real-time simulation, Flight simulation technologies AIAA conference, AIAA-91-2979-CP, New Orleans, 1991.Google Scholar
24. Hanke, C.R. and Nordwall, D.R. The simulation of a large jet transport aircraft. Mathematical Model, 1971, 1, NASA CR-1756.Google Scholar
25. Boiffier, J.L. The Dynamics of Flight - the Equations, 1998, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
26. Valentino, G.J. Shared memory networks (SMNs): a key enabling technology for distributed real-time systems, Flight simulation technologies AIAA conference, AIAA-94-3427-CP, 1994.Google Scholar
27. Kruger, W., Besselink, I., Cowling, D., Doan, D.B., Kortum, W. and Krabacher, W. Aircraft landing gear dynamics: simulation and control, vehicle system dynamics, 1997, 28, pp 119–158.Google Scholar
28. Barnes, A. and Yager, T. Simulation of aircraft behaviour on or close to the ground, AGARD AG-285, 1985.Google Scholar
29. Tomlinson, B.N. Developments in the simulation of atmospheric turbulence in flight simulation/guidance systems simulation, AGARD CP-198, Paris, 1975.Google Scholar
30. Dorbolo, G. and Van Sliedregt, J.M. Improvements in motion drive algorithms, Summer computer simulation conference proceedings, pp 721–723, San Diego, 1987.Google Scholar
31. Advani, S.K., Nahon, M.A., Haeck, N. and Albronda, J. Optimisation of six-degrees-of-freedom motion systems for flight simulators, AIAA J Aircr, 1999,36,(5).Google Scholar
32. Nahon, M.A. and Reid, L.D. Simulator motion drive algorithms: a designer's perspective, AIAA J Guidance, 1990, 13, (2), pp 356–362.Google Scholar
33. Reid, L.D. and Nahon, M.A. Flight simulation motion-base drive algorithms, Report Nos UTIAS-296, UTIAS-307 and UTIAS-319, Inst for Space Studies, Toronto University, 1986.Google Scholar
34. Gower, D.W. and Lilienthal, M.G. Simulator sickness in US Army and Navy fixed and rotary wing flight simulators, Motion cues in flight simulation and simulation induced sickness AGARD conference, AGARD-CP-433, 1988.Google Scholar
35. Hixson, W.C. and Niven, J.I. Application of the system transfer function concept to a mathematical description of the labyrinth steady state nystagamus response to semi-circular canal stimulation by angular acceleration, US Navy School of Aviation Medicine, Report No 57,1961.Google Scholar
36. Parish, R.V., Dieudonne, J.E. and Bowles, R.L. Coordinated adaptive washout for motion simulators, J Aircr, 12, (1), pp 44–50, 1975.Google Scholar
37. Lintern, G. Flight Simulation motion systems revisited, Human Factors Society Bulletin, 1987, (30), pp 1–3.Google Scholar
38. Cardullo, F.M. An assessment of the importance of motion cueing based on the relationship between simulated aircraft dynamics and pilot performance: a review of the literature, AIAA-91-2980-CP, 1991.Google Scholar
39. Caro, P.W. Platform motion and simulator training effectiveness, Proceedings of 10th NTEC industry conference, Orlando, pp 93-97, 1977.Google Scholar
40. Martin, E.L. and Waag, W.L. Contribution of motion platform to simulator training effectiveness, Contract AFHRL-TR-78-52, ADA-064-305, USAF Human Resources Laboratory, Williams Air Force Base, 1978.Google Scholar
41. Schachter B.J., (Ed) Computer Image Generation, 1983, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
42. Brenton E., Gindelberger and Steenrod, F.J. A comparison of digital terrain models and terrain masking algorithms, National aerospace and electronics IEEE conference, 1985.Google Scholar
43. Haber, R.N. and Hershenson, M. The Psychology of Visual Perception, 1973, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar
44. Buffet, A.R. The Visual Perception of Depth Cueing using Electrooptical Systems, Displays Technology and Applications, Vol 2, Part 1, pp 39–45, 1980.Google Scholar
45. Barnes, A.G. The integration of a six-axis motion system and a wide angle visual systems inside a dome, Advances in flight simulation - visual and motion systems RAeS conference, London, 1986.Google Scholar
46. Fernie, A. Helmet-mounted display with dual resolution, SID 95, Society for Information Display symposium, Orlando, 1995.Google Scholar
47. Cook, A.M. The helmet-mounted visual display system in flight simulation, Recent developments in technology and use RAeS conference, London, 1988.Google Scholar
48. Goode, M. and Evans, D. An instructor station for the instructor, European forum on matching technology to training requirements RAeS conference, London, 1992.Google Scholar
49. Ahn, Y.H. Advances in instructor operator stations, Flight simulation - expanding the boundaries RAeS conference, London, 1997.Google Scholar
50. Allerton, D.J. The design of a real-time engineering flight simulator for the rapid prototyping of avionics systems and flight control systems, Trans Institute of Measurement and Control, 1999, 21, (2/3).Google Scholar
51. Statler, I.C. and Arlin, Deel. The role of the research simulator in the systems development of rotorcraft, NASA TM-8I276, 1981.Google Scholar
52. Zammit, S. and Zwaanenburg, K. Real-time flight simulation support for the X-31 aircraft program, AIAA 89-3283-CP, 1989.Google Scholar
53. Dusterberry, J.C. and White, M.D. The development and use of largemotion simulator systems in aeronautical research, Fifty years of flight simulation RAeS conference, pp 1–16, London, 1979.Google Scholar
54. Telfer, R.A. (Ed). Aviation Instruction and Training, Ashgate, 1993.Google Scholar
55. Caro, P. Flight Training and Simulation, in Human Factors in Aviation, 1988, Academic Press.Google Scholar
56. Roscoe, S.N. Aviation Psychology, 1986, Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
57. Wiener, E.L. Human factors of advanced technology (‘glass cockpit’) transport aircraft, NASA NCC2-377, 1989.Google Scholar
58. Anon The interfaces between flight crews and modern flight deck systems, FAA Human Factors Team, 1996.Google Scholar
59. Trollip, S.R. and Jensen, R.S. Human Factors in General Aviation, 1991, Jeppeson Sanderson, Englewood.Google Scholar
60. Allerton, D.J. and Ross, M. Evaluation of a part-task trainer for ab initio pilot training, Training transfer RAeS conference, London, 1991.Google Scholar
61. Anon ICAO, Flight crew training: cockpit resource management (CRM) and line orientated flight training (LOFT), Human Factors Digest, (2), Circular 217-AN/l 32, 1991.Google Scholar
62. Ruffel-Smith H.P. A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance and decisions, NASA TM-78482, 1979.Google Scholar
63. Thompson, D.R. Transfer of training from simulators to operational equipment - are simulators effective?, J Edu Tech Systems, 1989, 17, (3), pp 213–218.Google Scholar
64. Hays, R.T. and Singer, M.J. Simulation Fidelity in Training System Design, 1989, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
65. Taylor, H.L. Training effectiveness of flight simulators as determined by transfer of training, NATA DRG Panel VIII Symp, Brussels, 1985.Google Scholar
66. Povenmire, H.K. and Roscoe, S.N. Incremental transfer effectiveness of a ground based general aviation flight trainer, Human Factors, 1971, 13, (2),pp 109–116.Google Scholar
67. Waag, W.L. Training effectiveness of visual and motion simulation, AFHRL-TR-79-72, USAF Human Resources Laboratory, William Air Force Base. 1981.Google Scholar
68. Caro, P.W. The relationship between flight simulator motion and training requirements, Human Factors, 1979, 21, (4), pp 493–501.Google Scholar
69. Rolfe, J.M. and Caro, P.W Determining the training effectiveness of flight simulators: some basic issues and practical development. Applied Ergonomics, 1982,13, (4), pp 243–250.Google Scholar
70. Longridge, T., Boothe, E. and Burki-Cohen, J. Initiative towards more affordable flight simulators for US commuter airline training, Training - lowering the cost - maintaining the fidelity RAeS conference, London, 1996.Google Scholar
71. Tomlinson, B.N. An introduction to the development and application of distributed simulation. The progress and direction of distributed interactive simulations RAeS conference, London, 1996, pp 1-10.Google Scholar
72. Anon Standard simulator database (SSDB) interchange format (SIF) design standard, MIL-STD-1821, US DoD, 1993.Google Scholar
73. Anon IEEE Standard for distributed interactive simulation - application protocols. Version 2.0, IEEE STD-1278.1, 1995.Google Scholar