Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:02:13.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gyros, powerful tools in aerospace technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Kurt Magnus*
Affiliation:
Technical University, Munich

Extract

It was a great pleasure for me to accept the invitation to give this lecture on European Pioneer’s Day and at the same time a great honour to be able to revive the memory of Max Schuler, an ingenious engineer and scientist, whose work in a most remarkable way influenced the development of aerospace technology. For many decades Schuler (Fig. 1) was actively working in the fascinating field of gyros and their numerous applications, especially on problems of navigation, stabilisation and attitude control. Schuler’s name is closely associated with the gyro—which the British astronomer Sir John Herschel once described as ‘a philosophical instrument’. But it had a long way to go before it became a useful technical device. I will try to cover this development and say some words on what the method of ‘Schuler-tuning’ means and how it was detected.

I am sure you will remember those days and weeks, more than five years ago, when we anxiously waited to hear news of the different Apollo missions to the moon. We were astonished at the scarcely believable precision of these flights and in my opinion technical outsiders were in a much better situation than specialists, for they were under more stress because of their knowledge about the function of the subsystems in the extremely complicated Apollo spaceship.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Short, J. An account of an horizontal top invented by Serson. Phil Trans London, 47, p 352, 1751/52.Google Scholar
2. Fleuriais, G. Gyroscope collimateur. Rev. Marit. et Col., Paris, 91, p 452, 1886.Google Scholar
3. Foucault, L. Sur une nouvelle démonstration expérimentale du mouvement de la terre. Comptes Rendues, Paris, 35, p 421, 1852.Google Scholar
4. Magnus, K. Zur Geschichte der Anwendung von Kreiseln in Deutschland. In Die Entwicklung der Mechanik von Kreisel-und Inertial-Systemen, Verlag Wissenschaft, pp 285306, Moskau 1973.Google Scholar
5. 50 Jahre Anschütz & Co GmbH Firmenbericht, Kiel, 1955.Google Scholar
6. Schuler, M. Die geschichtliche Entwicklung des Kreisel-kompasses in Deutschland. VDI-Zeitschrift, 104, pp 469476 and pp 593–599, 1962.Google Scholar
7. Rosenbaum, T. Das Luft-Navigierungs-Instrument Gyro-rector. Illustrierte Flug-Woche, 6, pp 4344, 1924.Google Scholar
8. Fischel, E. M. Two v. three-gyro guidance platforms. Control Engineering, pp 9296 and pp 122–126, 1961.Google Scholar
9. Magnus, K. Kreisel, Theorie und Anwendungen. Kap. 16.3, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1971.Google Scholar
10. Shaw, J. Benefits of strapdown over gimbal systems. NAECON 76, Dayton Ohio, 18th-20th May, 1976.Google Scholar
11. Peterson, R. Advantages of gimballed inertial navigation systems. NAECON 76, Dayton Ohio, 18th–20th May 1976.Google Scholar
12. Flook, L. Control moment gyro application to spacecraft attitude control and stabilization. ESRO Report CR-23, August 1970.Google Scholar
13. Automatic control in space. IFAC-Symposium, Rottach-Egern, VDI-Verlag, Dusseldorf, 1976, Sessions Id and 8.Google Scholar
14. Applications of modern gyro technology. Astronautics and Guided Flight Section Symposium, The Royal Aeronautical Society, London, January 1977.Google Scholar
15. SIOURIS, M. A survey of new inertial sensor technology. Z. Flugwiss, Weltraumforsch 1, pp 346-353, 1977.Google Scholar
16. Dynamics of multibody systems. IUTAM Symposium, Munich 1977, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1978.Google Scholar