Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:15:27.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maintenance test flying – an accident waiting to happen?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

S. Poprawa*
Affiliation:
South African Airways, Johannesburg, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper focuses on maintenance test flying as pertaining to commercial jet aircraft. Aircraft maintenance manuals or regulatory prescriptions require aircraft to be test flown prior to being released to service, following specific maintenance, repair, overhaul or modification events. Further, such flights might be conducted to accept or return aircraft as demonstration of their serviceability. Similarly, test flights to verify aircraft performance are at times required.

Such maintenance test flights are mostly conducted by pilots rated to fly those aircraft primarily in commercial line operations, typically with no or little training on such specific maintenance or performance test flight procedures or techniques. The international regulatory environment remains in flux with discussion ongoing.

In conducting such flights a pilot is exposed to activities outside the normal aircraft standard operating procedures up to the edge of the operational flight envelope. Whilst not intentional, abnormal aircraft behaviour can nevertheless result in inadvertent flight outside the envelope with a consequential potential loss of control. History has shown that the predominant cause of fatal accidents during maintenance test flying result from complex loss of control scenarios not recovered or not recoverable. This raises the question of adequacy of pilot training.

Maintenance test flights are a necessary component for the industry to maintain its exceptional safety standards and minimising loss of life. But such flights in themselves remain demonstrably one or two orders of magnitude more risky than commercial flights.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

References

1.Tyler, T. VIP Comment, Flug Revue Magazine, December 2013. http://www.flugrevue.de/english/flug-revue-contents-december-2013/540936Google Scholar
2. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents, Worldwide Operation 1959 to 2011, July 2012, http://lessonslearned.faa.gov/Boeingstatsum2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
3. Aviation Safety Network, Flight Safety Foundation, http://aviation-safety.netGoogle Scholar
9. Flight Safety Foundation, Functional Check Flight Symposium, www.flightsafety.com, 8–9 February 2011.Google Scholar
10. BEA, Accident on 27 November 2008 to A320-232 D-AXLA, September 2010 http://www.bea.aero/docspa/2008/d-la081127.en/pdf/d-la081127.en.pdfGoogle Scholar
12. EASA, Comment Response Document 2008-20, 13 September 2012 http://easa.europa.eu/system/fles/dfu/CRD%202008-20.pdfGoogle Scholar
13. EASA, Safety Information Bulletin 2011-07, 5 May 2011 ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/SIB_201107.pdf/SIB_2011-07_1Google Scholar
14. EASA, Notice of Proposed Amendment 2012-08, 30 July 2012 http://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/NPA%202012-08.pdfGoogle Scholar
15. EASA, Comment Response Document 2012-08, 10 December 2013 https://easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/CRD%202012-08.pdfGoogle Scholar