Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:06:17.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Materials for airframes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

H. M. Flower  and
C. Soutis
H. M. Flower
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Imperial College, London UK
C. Soutis
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Aerospace Engineering University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The prediction of the future is always a relatively uncertain process. The only certain fact is that the prediction is unlikely to be wholly accurate. Even the prediction of trends following examination of past performance will be uncertain regarding the future rate of advance and may be entirely upset by new discoveries and their application. This is as true for examining the future of airframe materials as it is for prediction of economic growth, which itself significantly affects the development of materials technology in the aircraft industry. However, 100 years of powered manned flight does give a solid database from which to begin. In that period airframes have moved from wood, wire and canvas, through to riveted and stressed skin metal structures to adhesively bonded polymer composites. In each case the use of new materials is associated with a change in fabrication methods and it may be confidently anticipated that this will remain true in the future. This fact accounts for a justified conservatism in embracing new materials, not simply because of the need to develop experience and confidence in them, but also because of the costs associated with new constructional methods entailed in their application. It also, in part, accounts for the generally slower pace of application of new materials relative to what is initially predicted: the other powerful brake being the state of the economy and the market for new aircraft at any particular time. The early prediction of the demise of aluminium and its replacement by polymer composites made in the 1980s being a case in point, while the failure of alloys containing lithium to replace conventional aluminium alloys had more to do with cost and decreasing fuel prices than any alloy development problems. It can, however, be expected that, as in the twentieth century, military aircraft will exploit larger mass fractions of advanced materials and at earlier dates than civil transport aircraft, given their very different operational requirements and much shorter design lives. The likely advent of unmanned combat aircraft may well accentuate this difference.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1072: Aerospace the challenge ahead , June 2003 , pp. 331 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Quist, W.E., Narayanan, G.H. and Wingert, A.L., Aluminium-Lithium alloys for aircraft structure — An overview, 1984, Aluminium-Lithium Allys II. Sanders, T.H. and Starke, E.A. (Eds), Met. Soc AIME, pp 313–334.Google Scholar
2. Wilm, A. Metallurgie, Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Hüttenkunde: Aufbereitung-Eisen-und Matallhüttenkunde-Metallographie, 8, 1911, Borchers, W. and Wust, F. (Eds) Reproduced in English in MARTIN J.W. Precipitation Hardening, 1998, 2nd ed, Butterworth Heineman.Google Scholar
3. Starink, M.J., Sinclair, I., Reed, P.A.S. and Gregson, P.J., Predicting structural performance of heat-treatable alloys, in Aluminium Alloys: Their Physical and Mechanical Properties, 2000, Starke, E.A., Sanders, T.H. and Cassada, W.A. (Eds) (Proc. ICAA-7), Mater, Sci, Forum, 331–337, pp 97–110.Google Scholar
4. Heinz, A., Haszler, A., Keidel, C., Moldenhauer, S., Benedictus, R. and Miller, W.S., Recent developments in aluminium alloys for aerospace applications, 2000, Mat Sci Eng A280, pp 102–107.Google Scholar
5. Woodward, R., Where next wrought aluminium alloys? Aluminium Today, December 1997, pp 21–24.Google Scholar
6. Thomas, W.M., Nicholas, E.D., Watts, E.R. and Staines, D.G., Friction based welding technology for aluminium, Aluminium Alloys, Their Physical and Mechanical Properties, 2002, 3, (eds). Gregson, P.J. and Harris, S.J. (Eds), Trans Tech Publications, pp 1543–1548.Google Scholar
7. Kinloch, A.J. Adhesion and Adhesives: Science and Technology, 1987, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
8. Grimes, R., Dashwood, R.J. and Flower, H.M., High strain rate aluminium alloys: the way forward? 2001, Materials Science Forum 357–359, pp 339–344.Google Scholar
9. Stanford Materials WebSite http://www.stanfordmaterials.com/sc.html on 26 July 2000).Google Scholar
10. Grimes, R., Richard Dashwood, R.J., and Flower, H.M., Towards superplasticity in AA 6XXX alloys.Google Scholar
11. Lee, P.D., Atwood, R.C., Dashwood, R.J and Nagaumi, H., Modeling of porosity formation in direct chill cast aluminium-magnesium alloy, 2002, Mat Sci Eng, A328, pp 213–222.Google Scholar
12. Kennerknecht, S., Structural aerospace aluminium investment castings 10-year (1990–2000) supply and demand market evolution. Proc AeroMat 2001, Long Beach, California, ASM.Google Scholar
13. Froes, S.H., Developments in titanium applications, October 1995, Light Metal Age, pp 6–8.Google Scholar
14. Okura, Y., Titanium sponge production technology, 1996, In Titanium ‘95: Science and Technology, 2, pp 1427–1437, Blenkinsop, P.A., Evans, W.J. and Flower, H.M. (Eds) Inst Materials, London.Google Scholar
15. Chen, G.Z., Fray, D.J. and Farthing, T.W., Direct electrochemical reduction of titanium dioxide to titanium in molten calcium chloride, 2000, Nature, 407, pp 361–364.Google Scholar
16. Kelly, A. (Ed), Concise encyclopaedia of composite materials, Pergamon, 1994.Google Scholar
17. Aerospace composite structures in the USA, Report for the International Technology Service (Overseas Missions Unit) of the DTI, UK. 1999.Google Scholar
18. Rawal, S., Metal-matrix composites for space applications. J Mats, April 2001, 14–17.Google Scholar
19. Vlot, A. and Gunnick, J.W. (Eds), Fibre Metal Laminates, 2001, Klewer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
19. Matthews, F.L. and Rawlings, R.D. Composite Materials: Engineering and Science, 1994, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
20. Hull, D. An Introduction to Composite Materials, 1987, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
21. Matthews, F.L., Davies, G.A.O., Hitchings, D. and Soutis, C. Finite Element Modelling of Composite Materials and Structures, 2000, Woodhead Publishing.Google Scholar
22. Gutowski, T.G. (Ed) Advanced composites manufacturing, 1997, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar