Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:27:04.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-agent cooperative multi-model adaptive guidance law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2021

S.B. Wang Open the ORCID record for S.B. Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
S.C. Wang ,
Z.G. Liu ,
S. Zhang  and
Y. Guo
S.B. Wang*
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institution of Hi-Technology Xi’an, 710025, People’s Republic of China
S.C. Wang
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institution of Hi-Technology Xi’an, 710025, People’s Republic of China
Z.G. Liu
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institution of Hi-Technology Xi’an, 710025, People’s Republic of China
S. Zhang
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institution of Hi-Technology Xi’an, 710025, People’s Republic of China
Y. Guo*
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institution of Hi-Technology Xi’an, 710025, People’s Republic of China and Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi’an, 710072, People’s Republic of China
*
wangshaobo0325@163.com
guoyang820@foxmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multi-agent engagement scenario is considered in which a high-value aircraft launches two defenders to intercept two homing missiles aimed at the aircraft. Under the assumption that all aircrafts have first-order linear dynamic characteristics, a combined multiple-mode adaptive estimation (MMAE) and a two-way cooperative optimal guidance law are proposed for the target–defenders team. Considering the full cooperation of the target and both the two defenders, the two-way cooperative strategies provide the analytical expressions for their optimal control input, enabling the target–defenders team to intercept the missiles with minimal control effort. To successfully intercept the missiles, MMAE is used to identify the guidance laws adopted by the missiles and estimate their states. The simulation results show that the target cooperating with the defenders to perform lure manoeuvres for the missiles can improve the guidance performance of the defenders as well as reduce the control effort of the defenders for intercepting the missiles.

Keywords

Multi-agentcooperative guidancetwo-way cooperativeoptimal controlmultiple-mode adaptive estimatorstate estimation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 125 , Issue 1288 , June 2021 , pp. 1103 - 1129
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zarchan, P. Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 157, AIAA, 1994, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Garber, V. Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets, AIAA J, 1968, 6, (11), pp 2196–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, G.R. Optimal intercept guidance for short-range tactical missiles, AIAA J, 1971, 9, (7), pp 1414–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyell, L.R. Defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack, IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 1976, 12, (4), pp 522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyell, L.R. Counterweapon aiming for defence of a moving target, IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 1980, 16, (3), pp 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W., Qu, Z.H. and Marwan, A.S. Nash strategies for pursuit-evasion differential games involving limited observations, IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2015, 51, (2), pp 1347–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C. and Dimitra, P. Control strategies for multiplayer target-attacker-defender differential games with double integrator dynamics, 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2017.Google Scholar
Ratnoo, A. and Shima, T. Line of sight guidance for defending an aircraft, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamasaki, T. and Balakrishnan, S.N. Triangle intercept guidance for aerial defense, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaferman, V. and Shima, T. Cooperative multiple model adaptive guidance for an aircraft defending missile, J Guid Control Dyn, 2010, 33, (6), pp 1801–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S. and Takano, H. Modified CLOS intercept guidance for aircraft defense against a guided missile, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnoo, A. and Shima, T. Guidance laws against defended aerial targets, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnoo, A. and Shima, T. Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn, 2011, 34, (2), pp 522–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shima, T., Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile, J Guid Control Dyn, 2011, 34, (2), pp 414–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Wang, S.C., Yao, Y. and Yang, B. Evader maneuver on consideration of energy consumption in flight vehicle interception scenarios, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2011, 15, (7), pp 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinsky, S. and Gutman, S. Three body guaranteed pursuit and evasion, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnoo, A. and Shima, T. Guidance strategies against defended aerial targets, AIAA J Guid Control Dyn, 2012, 35, (4), pp 1059–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopov, O. and Shima, T. Linear quadratic optimal cooperative strategies for active aircraft protection, J Guid Control Dyn, 2013, 36, (3), pp 753–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M., et al. Minimum effort intercept and evasion guidance algorithms for active aircraft defense, J Guid Control Dyn, 2016, 39, (10), pp 2297–2311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaferman, V. and Shima, T. Cooperative optimal guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle, J Guid Control Dyn, 2015, 38, (8), pp 1395–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonod, R. and Shima, T. Estimation enhancement by cooperatively imposing relative intercept angles, J Guid Control Dyn, 2017, 40, (7), pp 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, A., Shima, T. and Rusnak, I. Cooperative differential games strategies for active aircraft protection from a homing missile, J Guid Control Dyn, 2011, 34, (3), pp 761–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinsky, S. and Gutman, S. Three-player pursuit and evasion conflict, J Guid Control Dyn, 2014, 37, (1), pp 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalumov, V. Optimal cooperative guidance laws in a multiagent target–missile–defender engagement, J Guid Control Dyn, 2019, 42, (9), pp 1993–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouada, T., Pavic, M.V., Pavkovic, B.M., et al. Application of optimal control law to laser guided bomb, Aeronaut J, 2018, 122, (1251), pp 785–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, A. and Ho, Y. Applied Optimal Control, pp 148–176, Chap. 5, Blaisdell Publ., 1969, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
Magill, T.D. Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic process, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1965, 10, (4), pp 434–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S., Guo, Y., Lu, Z.X., Wang, S.C. and Liu, Z.G. Cooperative detection based on the adaptive interacting multiple model-information filtering algorithm, Aerosp Sci Technol, 93.Google Scholar