Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:33:28.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New three-dimensional second-order sliding mode guidance law with impact-angle constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2019

F.-J. Zhao*
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institute of High Technology, Xi’an, Shan Xi province, China
H. You
Affiliation:
Xi’an Research Institute of High Technology, Xi’an, Shan Xi province, China

Abstract

Aiming at the issue of missiles attacking on-ground maneuvering targets in three-dimensional space, a three-dimensional finite-time guidance law with impact-angle constraints is proposed. In order to improve convergence speed and restrain chattering phenomenon, the nonsingular fast terminal three-dimensional second-order sliding mode guidance law with coupling terms is designed based on the theory of nonhomogeneous fast terminal sliding surface and second-order sliding mode control. The system model need not be linearized during the design process, and the singular problem is avoided. A nonhomogeneous disturbance observer is designed to estimate and compensate the total disturbance, which is caused by target maneuvering information and coupling terms of line of sight. And the stability and finite-time convergence of the guidance law are proved strictly and mathematically. Finally, simulation results have verified the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed guidance law.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Xinsan, L.I., Lixin, W. and Xiaohu, F. Two-stage control guidance of missile impact angle and flight time, Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2017, 39, (6), pp 611.Google Scholar
Erer, K.S. and Tekin, R. Impact time and angle control based on constrained optimal solutions, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2016, 39, (10), pp 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, I. and Shima, T. Intercept angle missile guidance under time varying acceleration bounds, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2013, 36, (3), pp 686699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.H., Kim, T.H. and Tahk, M.J. Interception angle control guidance using proportional navigation with error feedback, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2013, 36, (5), pp 15561561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Lin, D. and CHENG, Z. Optimal guidance of extended ballistic shaping, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27, (5), pp 12591272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Wang, Z. and LIN, H. A cooperative guidance law with constraints of impact time and impact angle, Journal of Ballistics, 2017, 29, (4), pp 18.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Liu, M. and LI, Y. Backstepping sliding mode control and extended state observer based guidance law design with angles, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39, (6), pp 13111316.Google Scholar
Wang, X. and Hong, Y. Finite-time consensus for multi-agent networks with second-order agent dynamics, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2018, 41, (2), pp 1518515190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, S., Wang, W. and Wang, S. Nonsingular fast terminal sliding-mode guidance with intercept angle constraint, Control Theory & Applications, 2014, 31, (3), pp 269278.Google Scholar
Zhao, B., Zhou, J. and Lu, X. Adaptive integral sliding mode guidance law considering impact angel constraint, Control and Decision, 2017, 32, (11), pp 19661972.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Li, P. and Liu, J. Finite-ime sliding mode control based 3D guidance law with impact angle constraints, Journal of Beijing University of Aero- nautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44, (2), pp 273279.Google Scholar
Si, Y. and Song, S. Design of three-dimensional finite-time guidance law for intercepting hypersonic vehicle, Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 2017, 25, (3), pp 405414.Google Scholar
Arie, L. Principles of 2-sliding mode design, Automatica, 2007, 43, (4), pp 576586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, L.H., Wang, W.H. and YI, R. A novel guidance law using fast terminal sliding mode control with impact angle constraints, ISA Transactions, 2016, 64, pp 1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, L., Xuefeng, P., Jianjun, M. and Shuai, T Non-homogeneous disturbance observer–based second order sliding mode control for a tailless aircraft, Proceedings of Chinese Automation Congress, 2013, pp 120125. doi: 10.1109/cac.2013.6775713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S.R. Nonsgular terminal sliding mode guidance with impact angle constraints, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37, (4), pp 11141130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y. Finite-time convergent guidance law with impact angle constraint based on sliding-mode control, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2012, 70, (1), pp 619625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, S.P. and Bernstein, D.S. Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2000, 38, (3), pp 751766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. and Kim, Y. Three-dimensional impact angle control guidance law for missiles using dual sliding surfaces, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2013, 46, (19), pp 137142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H. Study on guidance law and cooperative guidance for multi-missiles based on finite–time and sliding mode theory, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, pp 4144.Google Scholar