Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:28:02.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical and experimental transition results evaluation for a morphing wing and aileron system

Part of: Smart Aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2018

R.M. Botez ,
A. Koreanschi ,
O.S. Gabor ,
Y. Tondji ,
M. Guezguez ,
J.T. Kammegne ,
L.T. Grigorie ,
D. Sandu ,
Y. Mebarki  and
M. Mamou
...Show all authors
R.M. Botez*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
A. Koreanschi
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
O.S. Gabor
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
Y. Tondji
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
M. Guezguez
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
J.T. Kammegne
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
L.T. Grigorie
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
D. Sandu
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory in Active Control, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
Y. Mebarki
Affiliation:
The Aerodynamics Laboratory, NRC Aerospace, Ottawa, Canada
M. Mamou
Affiliation:
The Aerodynamics Laboratory, NRC Aerospace, Ottawa, Canada
F. Amoroso
Affiliation:
University of Naples “Federico II,” Industrial Engineering Dept. - Aerospace Division, Naples, Italy
R. Pecora
Affiliation:
University of Naples “Federico II,” Industrial Engineering Dept. - Aerospace Division, Naples, Italy
L. Lecce
Affiliation:
University of Naples “Federico II,” Industrial Engineering Dept. - Aerospace Division, Naples, Italy
G. Amendola
Affiliation:
The Italian Aerospace Research Center (CIRA), Adaptive Structure Division, Capua (CE), Italy
I. Dimino
Affiliation:
The Italian Aerospace Research Center (CIRA), Adaptive Structure Division, Capua (CE), Italy
A. Concilio
Affiliation:
The Italian Aerospace Research Center (CIRA), Adaptive Structure Division, Capua (CE), Italy
*
ruxandra@gpa.etsmtl.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new wing-tip concept with morphing upper surface and interchangeable conventional and morphing ailerons was designed, manufactured, bench and wind-tunnel tested. The development of this wing-tip model was performed in the frame of an international CRIAQ project, and the purpose was to demonstrate the wing upper surface and aileron morphing capabilities in improving the wing-tip aerodynamic performances. During numerical optimisation with ‘in-house’ genetic algorithm software, and during wind-tunnel experimental tests, it was demonstrated that the air-flow laminarity over the wing skin was promoted, and the laminar flow was extended with up to 9% of the chord. Drag coefficient reduction of up to 9% was obtained when the morphing aileron was introduced.

Keywords

aerodynamicsMorphing Wing TipGenetic Optimization AlgorithmFlow TransitionDrag Coefficient ReductionWind Tunnel TestsMorphing Aileron Classification Description: AerodynamicsAeroelasticityAvionics and SystemsComputational Fluid DynamicsExperimental Fluid Dynamics
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1251 , May 2018 , pp. 747 - 784
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. ATAG, (2014) Aviation: benefits without borders”, Report, Air Transport Action Group, http://www.atag.org/.Google Scholar
2. United States Navy, F-14 Tomcat fighter fact file, 5 July 2003, retrieved: 20 January 2007, cited in May 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20060402215910/https://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=1100&tid=1100&ct=1Google Scholar
3. Talay, Th. A. ed. (2003) Dynamic Longitudinal, Directional, and Lateral Stability”, Centennial of Flight Commission, 2003, retrieved: 24 May 2011, cited in May 2016. https://www.centennialofflight.net/essay/Theories_of_Flight/Stability_II/TH27.htmGoogle Scholar
4. Bonnema, K.L. and Smith, S.B. (1998) “AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing flight research program, Report, 35th International Instrumentation Symposium, 1–4 May 1989, Orlando, Florida, US, pp 809-840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Sofla, A.Y.N., Meguid, S.A., Tan, K.T. and Yeo, W.K. Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges, Materials & Design, 2010, 31, (3), pp 1284-1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I. and Inman, D.J. A review of morphing aircraft, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2011, 22, (9), pp 823-877.Google Scholar
7. Sugar Gabor, O., Koreanschi, A. and Botez, R.M. Optimization of an unmanned aerial systems' wing using a flexible skin morphing wing, SAE Int J Aerospace, 2013, 6, (2013-01-2095), pp 115-121.Google Scholar
8. Sugar Gabor, O., Koreanschi, A. and Botez, R.M. Numerical optimization of the S4 Éhecatl UAS airfoil using a morphing wing approach, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA 32nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 16–20 June 2014, Atlanta, Georgia, US.Google Scholar
9. Pecora, R., Barbarino, S., Concilio, A., Lecce, A. and Russo, S. Design and functional test of a morphing high-lift device for a regional aircraft, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2011, 22, (10), pp 1005-1023.Google Scholar
10. Bilgen, O., Kochersberger, K.B. Diggs, E.C., Kurdila, A.J. and Inman, D.J. Morphing wing micro-air-vehicles via macro-fiber-composite actuators, Proceedings of 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 23–26 April 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii, US, AIAA Paper 2007-1785.Google Scholar
11. Bilgen, O., Kochersberger, K.B. and Inman, D.J. Macro-fiber composite actuators for a swept wing unmanned aircraft, Aeronautical J, 2009, 113, (1144), pp 385-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Pankonien, A.M. and Inman, D.J. Spanwise morphing trailing edge on a finite wing, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2015 Conference, 8 March 2015, San Diego, California, US.Google Scholar
13. Botez, R.M., Molaret, P. and Laurendeau, E. Laminar flow control on a research wing project presentation covering a three year period, Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute Annual General Meeting, 2007, 2007, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
14. Mamou, M., Mébarki, Y., Khalid, M., Genest, M., Coutu, D., Popov, A.V., Sainmont, C., Georges, T., Grigorie, L., Botez, R.M., Brailovski, V., Terriault, P., Paraschivoiu, I. and Laurendeau, E. Aerodynamic performance optimization of a wind tunnel morphing wing model subject to various cruise flow conditions, 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 19–24 September 2010, Nice, France.Google Scholar
15. Grigorie, T.L., Popov, A.V., Botez, R.M., Mamou, M. and Mébarki, Y. A morphing wing used shape memory alloy actuators new control technique with Bi-positional and PI laws optimum combination - Part 1: Design phase, ICINCO 2010, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Volume 1, 15–18 June 2010, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.Google Scholar
16. Grigorie, T.L., Popov, A.V., Botez, R.M., Mamou, M. and Mébarki, Y. A morphing wing used shape memory alloy actuators new control technique with bi-positional and PI laws optimum combination - Part 2: Experimental validation, ICINCO 2010, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Volume 1, 15–18 June 2010, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.Google Scholar
17. Coutu, D., Brailovski, V. and Terriault, P. Promising benefits of an active-extrados morphing laminar wing,” J Aircraft, March-April 2009, 46, no. 2, pp 730-731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Courchesne, S., Popov, A.V. and Botez, R.M. New aeroelastic studies for a morphing wing, 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2010, Orlando, Florida, US.Google Scholar
19. Popov, A.V., Botez, R.M., Grigorie, T.L., Mamou, M. and Mebarki, Y. Real time airfoil optimization of a morphing wing in wind tunnel, AIAA J Aircraft, 2010, 47, (4), pp 1346-1354.Google Scholar
20. Popov, A.-V., Labib, M., Fays, J. and Botez, R.M. Closed loop control simulations on a morphing laminar airfoil using shape memory alloys actuators, AIAA J Aircraft, 2008, 45, (5), pp 1794-1803.Google Scholar
21. Popov, A.V., Botez, R.M., Grigorie, T.L., Mamou, M. and Mebarki, Y. On–off and proportional–integral controller for a morphing wing. Part 1: Actuation mechanism and control design, J Aerospace Engineering, February 2012, 226, (2), pp 131-145. first published on November 21, 2011.Google Scholar
22. Grigorie, L.T. and Botez, R.M. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-based controllers for smart material actuator modelling, J Aerospace Engineering, June 1, 2009, 223, (6), pp 655-668.Google Scholar
23. Grigorie, L.T., Botez, R.M. and Popov, A.-V. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy controllers for an open loop morphing wing system, J Aerospace Engineering, 2009, 223, (J), pp 965-975.Google Scholar
24. Michaud, F., Joncas, S. and Botez, R.M. Design, manufacturing and testing of a small-scale composite morphing wing, 19th International Conference on Composite Materials, July 2013, Montréal, Québec, Canada.Google Scholar
25. Koreanschi, A., Henia, M.B., Guillemette, O., Michaud, F., Tondji, Y., Gabor, O.S. and Salinas, M.F. Flutter analysis of a morphing wing technology demonstrator: numerical simulation and wind tunnel testing, INCAS Bulletin, 2016, 8, (1), p 99.Google Scholar
26. Kammegne, M.J.T., Nguyen, D.H., Botez, R.M. and Grigorie, T.L. Control validation of a morphing wing in an open loop architecture, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Aviation Forum, 2015.Google Scholar
27. Kammegne, M.J.T., Belhadj, H., Nguyen, D.-H. and Botez, R.M. Nonlinear control logic for an actuator to morph a wing: Design and experimental validation, IASTED Modelling, Identification and Control Conference, 2015.Google Scholar
28. Michaud, F. Design and ptimization of a Composite Skin for an Adaptive Wing, Master of Science Thesis, 2014, Ecole de technologie superieure, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
29. Pecora, R., Amoroso, F., Magnifico, M., Dimino, I., and Concilio, A. KRISTINA: Kinematic Rib based Structural system for Innovative Adaptive trailing edge, SPIE Smart Structures/NDE, Las Vegas, Nevada (USA) March 2016. Proc. SPIE 9801, Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies 2016, 980107 (April 16, 2016); doi:10.1117/12.2218516Google Scholar
30. Dimino, I., Concilio, A. and Pecora, R. Safety and reliability aspects of an adaptive trailing edge device (ATED), 24th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, AIAA SciTech, 4–8 Jan 2016.Google Scholar
31. Barbarino, S., Pecora, R., Lecce, L., Concillio, A., Ameduri, S. and De Rosa, L. Airfoil structural morphing based on SMA actuator series: Numerical and experimental studies, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2001, 22, pp 987-1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Ameduri, S., Brindisi, A., Tiseo, B., Concilio, A. and Pecora, R. Optimization and integration of shape memory alloy (SMA) based elastic actuators within a morphing flap architecture, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2002, 23, (4), pp 381-396.Google Scholar
33. Diodati, G., Concilio, A., Ricci, S., de Gaspari, A., Liauzun, C. and Godard, J.L. Estimated performance of an adaptive trailing-edge device aimed at reducing the fuel consumption on a medium-size aircraft, Smart Structures/NDE Conference, 10–14 March 2013, San Diego, California, US.Google Scholar
34. Amendola, G., Dimino, I., Magnifico, M. and Pecora, R. Distributed actuation concepts for a morphing aileron device, Aeronautical J, 2016, 120, (1231), pp 1365-1385. doi 10.1017/aer.2016.64Google Scholar
35. Koreanschi, A., Sugar-Gabor, O. and Botez, R.M. Numerical and experimental validation of a morphed wing geometry using Price-Païdoussis wind-tunnel testing, Aeronautical J, 2016, 120, pp 757-795 doi: 10.1017/aer.2016.30Google Scholar
36. Sugar Gabor, O., Koreanschi, A. and Botez, R.M. Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics improvement of ATR 42 airfoil using a morphing wing approach, IECON 2012-38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2012, IEEE, pp 5451-5456.Google Scholar
37. Koreanschi, A., Gabor, O.S., Acotto, J., Brianchon, G., Portier, G., Botez, R.M., Mamou, M. and Mebarki, Y. Optimization and design of an aircraft's morphing wing-tip demonstrator for drag reduction at low speed, Part I—Aerodynamic optimization using genetic, bee colony and gradient descent algorithms, Chinese J Aeronautics, 2017, 30, (1), pp 149-163.Google Scholar
38. Menter, F.R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J, 1994, 32, (8), pp 1598-1605.Google Scholar
39. Langtry, R.B. and Menter, F.R. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes, AIAA J, 2009, 47, (12), pp 2894-2906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. ANSYS FLUENT, www.ansys.com.Google Scholar
41. Drela, M. XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils, Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Springer, 1989.Google Scholar
42. Koreanschi, A., Sugar Gabor, O. and Botez, R.M. Drag optimization of a wing equipped with a morphing upper surface, Royal Aeronautical J, 2015 March 2016, 120, (1225), pp 473-493, doi: 10.1017/aer.2016.6Google Scholar
43. Koreanschi, A., Sugar Gabor, O. and Botez, R.M. New numerical study of boundary layer behaviour on a morphing wing-with-aileron system, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA 32nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 16–20 June 2014, Atlanta, Georgia, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Mebarki, Y., Mamou, M. and Genest, M. Infrared measurements of the transition detection on the CRIAQ project morphing wing model, NRC LTR AL-2009-0075, 2009.Google Scholar