Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:52:30.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical investigation of aeroheating characteristics of spiked blunt bodies at Mach six flight conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

M. Y. M. Ahmed  and
N. Qin
M. Y. M. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Aerospace Department, Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt
N. Qin*
Affiliation:
Aerospace Department, Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt
*
n.qin@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adding a small aerodisk at the tip of the spike was proved to improve the spike’s performance in reducing the drag. If designed properly, the aerodisk spike can offer better performance in drag reduction in comparison with the pointed sharp-nosed spike. However, the impact of the aerodisk on the aeroheating reduction capabilities of the spike was not investigated in detail before. In the present work, a numerical investigation of the aerothermodynamic characteristics of spiked blunt bodies at Mach 6 flight conditions is conducted. It was found that, adding an aerodisk degrades the performance of the spike in reducing the aeroheating level. Nonetheless, the latter remains below that of the unspiked body.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 115 , Issue 1168 , June 2011 , pp. 377 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Menezes, V., Saravanan, S., Jagadeesh, G. and Reddy, K.P.J. Experimental investigations of hypersonic flow over highly blunted cones with aerospikes, AIAA J, 2003, 41, (10), pp 1955–1966.Google Scholar
2. Heubner, L.D., Mitchell, A.M. and Boudreaux, E.J. Experimental results on the feasibility of an aerospike for hypersonic missiles, January 1995, AIAA paper, 95-0737.Google Scholar
3. Kalimuthu, R., Mehta, R.C. and Rathakrishnan, E. Experimental investigation on spiked body in hypersonic flow, Aeronaut J, 2008, 112, (1136), pp 593–598.Google Scholar
4. Mehta, R.C. Flow field computations over conical, disc and flat spiked body at Mach 6, 2009, AIAA paper 2009-325.Google Scholar
5. Alexander, S.R. Results of tests to determine the effect of a conical windshield on the drag of a bluff body at supersonic speeds, January 1947, NACA RM L6K08a.Google Scholar
6. Maull, D.J. Hypersonic Flow over axially symmetric spiked bodies, J Fluid Mechanics, 1960, 8, (4), pp 584–592.Google Scholar
7. Mair, W.A. Experiments on separation of boundary layers on probes in front of blunt-nosed bodies in a supersonic air stream, Philosophy Magazine, 1952, 7, (43), 243, pp 695–716.Google Scholar
8. Crawford, D.H. Investigation of the flow over a spiked-nose hemisphere-cylinder, December 1959, NASA TN-D-118.Google Scholar
9. Holden, M. Experimental studies of separated flows at hypersonic speeds. Part I-separated flows over axisymmetric spiked bodies, AIAA J, 1966, 4, (4), pp 591–599.Google Scholar
10. Milicev, S.S. and Pavlovic, M.D. Influence of spike shape at supersonic flow past blunt-nosed bodies: experimental study, AIAA J, 2001, 40, (5), pp 1018–1020.Google Scholar
11. Kalimuthu, R., Mehta, R.C. and Rathakrishnan, E. Drag reduction for spike attached to blunt-nosed body at Mach 6, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 2010, 47, (1), pp 219–222.Google Scholar
12. Gnemmi, P., Srulijes, J. and Roussel, K. Flowfield around spike-tipped bodies for high attack angles at Mach 4.5, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 2003, 40, (5), pp 622–631.Google Scholar
13. Kurbatskii, K.A. and Montanari, F. Application of pressure-based coupled solver to the problem of hypersonic missiles with aerospikes, 2007, AIAA paper 2007-462.Google Scholar
14. Gauer, M. and Paull, A. Numerical investigation of a spiked blunt Nose Cone at Hypersonic Speeds, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45, (3), pp 459–471.Google Scholar
15. Ahmed, M. and Qin, N. Drag reduction using aerodisks for hypersonic hemispherical bodies, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 2010, 47, (1), pp 62–80.Google Scholar
16. Guenther, R.A. and Reding, J.P. Fluctuating pressure environment of a drag reduction spike, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 1977, 14, (12), pp 705–710.Google Scholar
17. Motoyama, N., Mihara, K., Miyajima, R., Watanuki, T. and Kubota, H. Thermal protection and drag reduction with use of spike in hypersonic flow, 2001, AIAA paper 2001-1828.Google Scholar
18. Us Standard Atmosphere, 1976, NASA – TM – X- 74335.Google Scholar
19. Gambit 2.4 User Guide, Fluent Inc, Lebanon, USAGoogle Scholar
20. Fluent 6.3 User Guide, Fluent Inc, Lebanon, USAGoogle Scholar
21. Chapman, D.R., Kuehn, D.M. and Larson, H.K. Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition, 1957, NACA TR 1356.Google Scholar
22. D’Humieres, G. and Stollery, J.L. Drag reduction on a spiked body at hypersonic speeds, Aeronaut J, 2010, 114, (1152), pp 113–119.Google Scholar
23. Wood, C.J. Hypersonic flow over spiked cones, J Fluid Mech, 1961, 12, (4), pp 614–624.Google Scholar
24. Anderson, J.D. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, Fourth Edition, 2007, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
25. Ahmed, M. and Qin, N. Metamodels for aerothermodynamic design optimization of hypersonic spiked blunt bodies, Aerospace Sci and Tech, 2010, 14, (5), pp 364–376. Google Scholar