Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-23T16:44:50.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical simulation of the DLR combustor considering the thermochemical non-equilibrium effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2025

D.E. Chen Open the ORCID record for D.E. Chen [Opens in a new window] ,
Y. Liang ,
S. Zhao ,
C.F. Yue  and
J.B. Wang Open the ORCID record for J.B. Wang [Opens in a new window]
D.E. Chen
Affiliation:
College of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China Engineering Research Center of Combustion and Cooling for Aerospace Power, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China
Y. Liang
Affiliation:
TaiHang Laboratory, Chengdu, P. R. China
S. Zhao
Affiliation:
TaiHang Laboratory, Chengdu, P. R. China
C.F. Yue
Affiliation:
College of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China Engineering Research Center of Combustion and Cooling for Aerospace Power, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China
J.B. Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China Engineering Research Center of Combustion and Cooling for Aerospace Power, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P. R. China
*
Corresponding author: J.B. Wang; Email: wangjingbo@scu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present work investigates the thermochemical non-equilibrium effect in the DLR combustor using a two-temperature model combined with vibration-chemistry coupling model. Two operating conditions with inflow Mach 2 and 6 are selected for study. The simulation results illustrate that translational-vibrational non-equilibrium is related to energy transfer behaviour and the translational-vibrational relaxation time. When kinetic energy and chemical energy are converted into internal energy, there is a significant difference in the degree of conversion to translational and vibrational energy. If the translational-vibrational relaxation time is larger than the flow time, such as the relaxation time of the mainstream aftershock wave is 0.25 s for the condition with inflow Mach 2, and the flow time is 3 × 10−5 s, non-equilibrium will occur. Significant differences exist between the flow fields with Mach 2 and 6. A clear boundary layer separation occurs at Mach 6. Combustion occurs at the shear layer, which is in translational-vibrational equilibrium, and there are varying degrees of non-equilibrium in other locations. The dissociation of N2 and production of NO primarily occur on the strut walls and the upper/lower walls of the combustor. The mass fraction of NO is higher than the value at Mach 2. The combustion performance is influenced by the thermochemical non-equilibrium effect. At the condition of Mach 2, it increases the combustion efficiency by 10% near the injector and 0.27% at outlet relatively. Non-equilibrium inhibits the initial upstream combustion while slightly promoting downstream combustion under inflow Mach 6 condition.

Keywords

translational-vibrational non-equilibriumvibration-chemistry couplingDLR scramjet combustornumerical simulation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , First View , pp. 1 - 22
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Morelli, E.A. and Derry, S.D. Aerodynamic parameter estimation for the X-43A (Hyper-X) from flight data, In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, 2005.10.2514/6.2005-5921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, B. and Shi, Z. An overview on flight dynamics and control approaches for hypersonic vehicles, Sci. China-Inf. Sci., 2015, 58, p 070201.10.1007/s11432-014-5273-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viviani, A. and Pezzella, G. Introductory Chapter: Hypersonic Vehicles – Past, Present, and Future Insights, Hypersonic Vehicles – Past, Present and Future Developments, IntechOpen, London, 2019.Google Scholar
Sandeep, J. Design and Performance of Hypersonic Intake for Scramjet Engine, Hypersonic and Supersonic Flight – Advances in Aerodynamics, Materials, and Vehicle Design, IntechOpen, London, 2022.Google Scholar
Urzay, J. Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight, AnRFM, 2018, 50, pp 593–627.Google Scholar
Curran, E.T. Scramjet engines: The first forty years, J. Propul. Power, 2001, 17, pp 1138–1148.10.2514/2.5875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, R.C., Raj, R., Dewang, Y. and Sharma, V. A review on scramjet engine, In Advances in Fluid and Thermal Engineering, 2021.10.1007/978-981-16-0159-0_48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.D. Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics, Third ed., AIAA, Reston, 2019.10.2514/4.105142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, F.C., Wolf, W.R. and Azevedo, J.L.F. Thermal analysis of hypersonic flows of carbon dioxide and air in thermodynamic non-equilibrium, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2021, 165, p 120670.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, S., Yuan, Z., Zhao, W. and Chen, W. Numerical simulation of hypersonic thermochemical nonequilibrium flows using nonlinear coupled constitutive relations, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2023, 36, pp 63–79.10.1016/j.cja.2022.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, J.J.S. and Yan, H. High-enthalpy hypersonic flows, Adv. Aerodynam., 2020, 2, p 19.10.1186/s42774-020-00041-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorshkov, A.B. Aerodynamic Heating at Hypersonic Speed, Heat Transfer – Mathematical Modelling, Numerical Methods and Information Technology, IntechOpen, London, 2011.Google Scholar
Zhao, W., Yang, X., Wang, J., Zheng, Y. and Zhou, Y. Evaluation of thermodynamic and chemical kinetic models for hypersonic and high-temperature flow simulation, Appl. Sci., 2023, 13, p 9991.10.3390/app13179991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, M.G., Moller, J.C. and Steele, R.C. Development of a new high-enthalpy shock tunnel, In 23rd Thermophysics, Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, 1988.10.2514/6.1988-2782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Z., Hu, Z., Wang, Y. and Han, G. Advances in critical technologies for hypersonic and high-enthalpy wind tunnel, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2020, 33, pp 3027–3038.10.1016/j.cja.2020.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, C. On convergence of computation of chemically reacting flows, In AlAA 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1985.10.2514/6.1985-247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, C. and Lee, S.H. Validation of multitemperature nozzle flow code, J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. Eng., 1994, 9, pp 9–16.10.2514/3.622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, M.G. and Kang, S.-W. Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Reentry Plasmas, NASA, 1973.Google Scholar
Park, C. Assessment of two-temperature kinetic model for ionizing air, J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., 1989, 3, pp 233–244.10.2514/3.28771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R.N., Yos, J.M. and Thompson, R.A. A Review of Reaction Rates and Thermodynamic and Transport Properties for an 11-Species Air Model for Chemical and Thermal Nonequilibrium Calculations to 30000K, NASA, 1989.Google Scholar
Cecere, D., Giacomazzi, E., Ingenito, A., A review on hydrogen industrial aerospace applications, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, pp 10731–10747.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebrouhi, B.E., Djoupo, J.J., Lamrani, B., Benabdelaziz, K. and Kousksou, T. Global hydrogen development – A technological and geopolitical overview, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 47, (11), 2022, pp 7016–7048.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachimowski, C.J. An Analytical Study of the Hydrogen-Air Reaction Mechanism with Application to Scramjet Combustion, NASA, 1988.Google Scholar
Evans, J.S. and Schexnayder, C.J. Influence of chemical kinetics and unmixedness on burning in supersonic hydrogen flames, AIAA J., 1980, 18, pp 188–193.10.2514/3.50747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, S., He, J., Ji, L. and Zhao, D., Identifying the skeleton mechanism for oscillatory combustion with functional weight analysis, Combust. Flame, 2022, 244, p 112243.10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, M., Liang, S., Ji, L. and Zhao, D. Kinetical driving force analysis of unstable combustion behavior in ammonia/hydrogen blending system, Combust. Flame, 2024, 265, p 113450.10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casseau, V. Flow Solvers – hy2Foam, 2016.Google Scholar
Casseau, V., Palharini, R.C., Scanlon, T.J. and Brown, R.E. A two-temperature open-source CFD model for hypersonic reacting flows, part one: Zero-dimensional analysis, Aerospace, 2016, 3, p 34.10.3390/aerospace3040034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casseau, V., Espinoza, D.E.R., Scanlon, T.J. and Brown, R.E. A two-temperature open-source CFD model for hypersonic reacting flows, part two: Multi-dimensional analysis, Aerospace, 2016, 3, p 45.10.3390/aerospace3040045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ao, Y., Wu, K., Lu, H., Ji, F. and Fan, X. Combustion dynamics of high Mach number scramjet under different inflow thermal nonequilibrium conditions, Acta Astronaut., 2023, 208, pp 281–295.10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.04.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zidane, A., Haoui, R., Sellam, M. and Bouyahiaoui, Z. Numerical study of a nonequilibrium H2-O2 rocket nozzle flow, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44, pp 4361–4373.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, W. Nonequilibrium effects in hypersonic combustion modeling, J. Propul. Power, 2022, 38, pp 523–540.10.2514/1.B38617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Southpointe, Canonsburg, 2022.Google Scholar
Gehre, R.M., Wheatley, V. and Boyce, R.R. Computational investigation of thermal nonequilibrium effects in scramjet geometries, J. Propul. Power, 2013, 29, pp 648–660.10.2514/1.B34722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiévet, R., Voelkel, S., Koo, H., Raman, V. and Varghese, P.L. Effect of thermal nonequilibrium on ignition in scramjet combustors, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2017, 36, pp 2901–2910.10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiévet, R. and Raman, V. Effect of vibrational nonequilibrium on isolator shock structure, J. Propul. Power, 2018, 34, pp 1334–1344.10.2514/1.B37108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, H., Raman, V. and Varghese, P.L. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic combustion with thermal nonequilibrium, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2015, 35, pp 2145–2153.10.1016/j.proci.2014.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Zhuo, C., Dai, C. and Sun, B. Numerical investigation of thermochemical non-equilibrium effects in Mach 10 scramjet nozzle, Aeronaut. J., 2024, 128, pp 1–18.10.1017/aer.2024.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oevermann, M. Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2000, 4, pp 463–480.10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01070-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Wang, J. and Li, X. Application of hydrogen mechanisms in combustion simulation of DLR scramjet combustor and their effect on combustion performance, Fuel, 2023, 349, p 128659.10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genin, F. and Menon, S. Simulation of turbulent mixing behind a strut injector in supersonic flow, AIAA J., 2009, 48, pp 526–539.10.2514/1.43647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alff, F., Brummund, U., Clauss, W., Oschwald, M., Sender, J. and Waidmann, W. Experimental Investigation of the Combustion Process in a Supersonic Combustion Ramjet (SCRAMJET) Combustion Chamber, DGLR-Jahrestagung, 1994.Google Scholar
Gucrra, R., Waidmann, W. and Laiblc, C. An experimental investigation of the combustion of a hydrogen jet injected parallel in a supersonic air stream, In AIAA 3rd International Aerospace Planes Conference, 1991.10.2514/6.1991-5102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnoffo, P.A., Gupta, R.N. and Shinn, J.L. Conservation Equations and Physical Models for Hypersonic Air Flows in Thermal and Chemical Nonequilibrium, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Washington, D.C., 1989.Google Scholar
Landau, L. and Teller, E. Zur theorie der schalldispersion, Phys. Z. Sowjet., 1936, 10, p 34.Google Scholar
Millikan, R.C. and White, D.R. Systematics of vibrational relaxation, J. Chem. Phys., 1963, 39, pp 3209–3213.10.1063/1.1734182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalabrin, L.C. Numerical Simulation of Weakly Ionized Hypersonic Flow over Reentry Capsules, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2007.Google Scholar
Zhao, F. Numerical Simulation of Mixed Reaction Flow Field of Hypersonic Air Chemical Non-Equilibrium Flow and Fuel Gas Jet, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 2019.Google Scholar
Menter, F.R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J., 1994, 32, pp 1598–1605.10.2514/3.12149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomiak, J. and Karlsson, A. Flame liftoff in diesel sprays, Symp. (Int.) Combust., 1996, 26, pp 2557–2564.10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80088-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golovitchev, V.I., Nordin, N., Jarnicki, R. and Chomiak, J. 3-D diesel spray simulations using a new detailed chemistry turbulent combustion model, In International Spring Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exposition, 2000.10.4271/2000-01-1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W., Piao, Y., Xie, Q. and Ren, Z. Flame diagnostics with a conservative representation of chemical explosive mode analysis, AIAA J., 2019, 57, pp 1355–1363.10.2514/1.J057994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, K., Zhang, P., Yao, W. and Fan, X. Numerical investigation on flame stabilization in DLR hydrogen supersonic combustor with strut injection, Combust. Sci. Technol., 2017, 189, pp 2154–2179.10.1080/00102202.2017.1365847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, N., Zhao, D., Shi, J., Huang, H., Zhang, Y. and Sun, D. Characterizing and predicting bluff-body solid fuel ramjet performances via shape design and multi-objective optimization model, Phys. Fluids, 2023, 35, p 125150.10.1063/5.0176968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material
Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 6.3 MB