Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:51:37.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical study of geometric morphing wings of the 1303 UCAV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2021

B. Nugroho Open the ORCID record for B. Nugroho [Opens in a new window] ,
J. Brett ,
B.T. Bleckly  and
R.C. Chin
B. Nugroho*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering The University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
J. Brett
Affiliation:
Synergetics Consulting EngineersMelbourneAustralia
B.T. Bleckly
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering The University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
R.C. Chin
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering The University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
*
bagus.nugroho@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) are believed by many to be the future of aerial strike/reconnaissance capability. This belief led to the design of the UCAV 1303 by Boeing Phantom Works and the US Airforce Lab in the late 1990s. Because UCAV 1303 is expected to take on a wide range of mission roles that are risky for human pilots, it needs to be highly adaptable. Geometric morphing can provide such adaptability and allow the UCAV 1303 to optimise its physical feature mid-flight to increase the lift-to-drag ratio, manoeuvrability, cruise distance, flight control, etc. This capability is extremely beneficial since it will enable the UCAV to reconcile conflicting mission requirements (e.g. loiter and dash within the same mission). In this study, we conduct several modifications to the wing geometry of UCAV 1303 via Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to analyse its aerodynamic characteristics produced by a range of different wing geometric morphs. Here we look into two specific geometric morphing wings: linear twists on one of the wings and linear twists at both wings (wash-in and washout). A baseline CFD of the UCAV 1303 without any wing morphing is validated against published wind tunnel data, before proceeding to simulate morphing wing configurations. The results show that geometric morphing wing influences the UCAV-1303 aerodynamic characteristics significantly, improving the coefficient of lift and drag, pitching moment and rolling moment.

Keywords

UCAVCFDMorphing Wings
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 125 , Issue 1289 , July 2021 , pp. 1192 - 1208
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Woolvin, S. Conceptual design studies of the 1303 configuration, 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-299110.2514/6.2006-2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolvin, S. UCAV configuration & performance trade-offs, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-126410.2514/6.2006-1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McParlin, S., Bruce, R., Hepworth, A. and Rae, A. Low speed wind tunnel tests on the 1303 UCAV concept, 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-298510.2514/6.2006-2985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billman, G.M. and Osbourne, B.A. High l/d extended range/payload fighter aircraft technology. AFRL-VA-WP-1999-3084, 1998.Google Scholar
Ordoukhanian, E. and Madni, A.M. Blended wing body architecting and design: Current status and future prospects. Procedia Comput. Sci., 2014, 28, pp 619–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.03.07510.1016/j.procs.2014.03.075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billman, G.M. and Osbourne, B.A. High l/d extended range/payload fighter aircraft technology. AFRL-VA-WP-1999-3084y, 1998.Google Scholar
Bruce, R. High speed wind tunnel tests on the 1303 UCAV concept, 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2006.Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Khalid, M. and Ball, N. A CFD based study of UCAV 1303 model, 23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005. DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-461510.2514/6.2005-4615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petterson, K. CFD analysis of the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a UCAV, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-125910.2514/6.2006-1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhara, M.S. and McLain, B.K. Aerodynamic studies over a manoeuvring UCAV 1303 configuration, Aeronaut. J., 2013, 117, (1190), pp 445–465. DOI: 10.1017/s000192400000809510.1017/S0001924000008095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhara, M.S., Sosebee, P.D. and Medford, C.M. Water tunnel force and moment studies of a manoeuvring UCAV 1303 and their control, 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012.Google Scholar
Chung, J. and Ghee, T. Numerical investigation of UCAV 1303 configuration with and without simple deployable vortex flaps, 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-298910.2514/6.2006-2989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, B., Lee, D., Shim, H., Ahn, J., Choi, H.L., Park, S.O. and Oh, S.Y. Yaw-control spoiler design using design of experiments based wind tunnel testing, J. Aircraft, 2015, 52, (2), pp 713–718. DOI: 10.2514/1.c03274710.2514/1.C032747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Lee, S. and Kim, C. Actuations of synthetic jets on a UCAV planform at high angles of attack, 8th AIAA Flow Control Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-317110.2514/6.2016-3171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, M.P., Ng, T.T. and Vasuvedan, S. Plasma actuators for hingeless aerodynamic control of an unmanned air vehicle, AIAA Paper 2006-3495, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006.10.2514/6.2006-3495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, M.P., Ng, T.T., Vasudevan, S., Corke, T.C. and He, C. Plasma actuators for hingeless aerodynamic control of an unmanned air vehicle, J. Aircraft, 2007, 44, (4), pp 1264–1274. DOI: 10.2514/1.2536810.2514/1.25368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopera, J., Ng, T., Patel, M., Vasudevan, S. and Corke, T. Aerodynamic control of 1303 UAV using windward surface plasma actuators on a separation ramp, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-63610.2514/6.2007-636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., Corke, T., He, C., Othman, H., Matsuno, T., Patel, M. and Ng, T. Modification of the flow structure over a UAV wing for roll control, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-88410.2514/6.2007-884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentink, D., Müller, U.K., Stamhuis, E.J., de Kat, R., van Gestel, W., Veldhuis, L.L.M., Henningsson, P., HedenstrÖm, A, Videler, J.J. and van Leeuwen, J.L. How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings, Nature, 2007, 446, (7139), pp 1082–1085. DOI: 10.1038/nature0573310.1038/nature05733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisshaar, T.A. (ed.) Morphing Aircraft Technology - New Shapes for Aircraft Design, volume Overview 1. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: Multifunctional Structures/Integration of Sensors and Antennas, 2006.Google Scholar
Bowman, J., Sanders, B. and Weisshaar, T. Evaluating the impact of morphing technologies on aircraft performance, 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002. DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-163110.2514/6.2002-1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J., Sanders, B., Cannon, B., Kudva, J., Joshi, S. and Weisshaar, T. Development of next generation morphing aircraft structures, 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-173010.2514/6.2007-1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, M., McKenzie, G., Ol, M., Petterson, K. and Zhang, S. Joint TTCP CFD studies into the 1303 UCAV performance: first year results, 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-298410.2514/6.2006-2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, M. and Petterson, K. A computational study of the low-speed flow over the 1303 UCAV configuration, 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-456810.2514/6.2007-4568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, D. and Chadwick, E.A. Comparison of turbulence models effectiveness for a delta wing at low Reynolds numbers, EUCAS Conference, 2017.Google Scholar
Tournois, J., Wormser, C., Alliez, P. and Desbrun, M. Interleaving Delaunay refinement and optimization for practical isotropic tetrahedron mesh generation, ACM Trans. Graphics, 2009, 28, (3).10.1145/1531326.1531381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, H. Adaptive tetrahedral mesh generation by constrained Delaunay refinement, Int. J. Numerical Methods Eng., 2008, 75, (7), pp 856–880.10.1002/nme.2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. and Marusic, I. Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence, Philosophical Trans. R. Soc. A, 2007, 365, pp 647–664.10.1098/rsta.2006.1942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchins, N. and Marusic, I. Evidence of very long meandering streamwise structures in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech., 2007, 579, pp 1–28.10.1017/S0022112006003946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, R.J. and Mundell, A.R.G. Low speed wind tunnel tests on the 1303 UCAV concept, Tech Rep QinetiQ/FST/TR025502/1.0, QinetiQ, 2003.Google Scholar
Gunston, B. The Cambridge Aerospace Dictionary, Cambridge University Press, 2004, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511790539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W.F. Lifting-line analysis for twisted wings and washout-optimized wings, J. Aircraft, 2004, 41, (1), pp 128–136.10.2514/1.262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J., Tang, L., Hutchins, N. and Ooi, A. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the 1303 unmanned combat air vehicle, 17th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, 2010.Google Scholar