Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:29:51.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the application of light weight materials to improve aircraft fuel burn – reduce weight or improve aerodynamic efficiency?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

D. I. A. Poll
D. I. A. Poll*
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis, based upon exact relations and previously published approximate relations, is presented. It describes the connection between changes in aircraft weight and changes in the energy to revenue work ratio (ETRW), which, for a given aircraft on a given route, correspond to changes in trip fuel burn. This is used to establish the link between weight saving and fuel burn improvement at both the total aircraft and the component levels. The analysis is then extended to address the impact of trading weight savings anywhere on the aircraft for increased wing aspect ratio, whilst the aircraft total weight remains the same. It is shown that, for flights in excess of about 350 km, if saving fuel is the objective and provided that all the aerodynamic design and airworthiness requirements can be met, it is better to trade weight saving for increased aspect ratio. In general, the ratio of fuel burn reductions for traded to non-traded weight varies with aircraft size, design range, distance flown and payload carried, with the maximum values, for typical operational payloads, ranging from 2•8, for the smaller aircraft, to 2•2 for the largest aircraft, with medium haul operations deriving the largest benefit. It is estimated that, over the past 50 years, about 10% of the operational empty weight has been traded for increased aspect ratio, giving close to a 20% improvement in ETRW. Finally, estimates are produced for the impact of weight reduction and traded weight reduction on the fuel burn for the current global feet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1206 , August 2014 , pp. 903 - 934
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Poll, D.I.A. A first order method for the determination of the leading mass characteristics of civil transport aircraft, Aeronaut J, May 2011, 115, (1167), pp 257–272.Google Scholar
2. Poll, D.I.A. The optimum aeroplane and beyond, Aeronaut J, 113, (1141), March 2009, pp 151–164.Google Scholar
3. Randle, W.E., Hall, C.A. and Vera-Morales, M. Improved range equation based on aircraft flight data, J Aircr, July-August 2011, 48, (4), pp 1291–1298.Google Scholar
4. Bolts-Moorehead, P.J., Chaney, V.G., Lutz, E. and Vaux, S. Stalling transport aircraft, Aeronaut J, December 2013, 117, (1198), pp 1183–1206.Google Scholar
5. ESDU, Effect of planform geometry on low speed pitch-break characteristics of swept wings, October 2001, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, Data Item 01005.Google Scholar
6. Torenbeek, E. Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design, Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
7. Raymer, D.P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 1989, AIAA Educational Series.Google Scholar
8. Jenkinson, L.R., Simpkin, P. and Rhodes, D. Civil Jet Aircraft Design, 1999, Arnold.Google Scholar
9. Howe, D. Aircraft Conceptual Design Synthesis, Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, 2000.Google Scholar
10. Shevell, R.S., Fundamentals of Flight, Second Edition, 1989, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
11. Torenbeek, E. Advanced Aircraft Design, 2013, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
12. Penner, J.E. et al. Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, A special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, September 1999, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
13. Peeters, P.M., Middel, J. and Hoolhorst, A., Fuel efficiency and commercial aircraft. An overview of historical and future trends, November 2005. NLR-CR-2005-669, Nationaal Lucht-en Ruimtevaart-laboratorium, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
14. Jones, R.T. and Lasinski, T.A. Effect of winglets on the induced drag of ideal wing shapes. NASA Technical Memorandum 81230, September 1980.Google Scholar
15. Poll, D.I.A. On the effect of stage length on the efficiency of air transport, Aeronaut J, May 2011, 115, (1167), pp 273–283.Google Scholar
16. Eyers, C., Norman, P., Middel, J., Plohr, M., Michot, S., Atkinson, K., and Christou, R., 2004: AERO2k global aviation emissions inventories for 2002 and 2025, Technical report, QinetiQ, Farnborough, UK, qinetiq/04/01113.Google Scholar