Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:23:36.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pitot-tubes at 90 and 180 degrees of yaw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

O. O. Mojola
O. O. Mojola*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Ife, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As a total pressure sensor in laminar or turbulent flows, the conventional, circular, pitot-tube, with a sharp plane mouth and diameter ratio of about 0.6, has long been known to be insensitive to yaw within about ±10°, relative to the incident stream direction, and, apart from a few isolated attempts to design special pitot-probes having a flat yaw response of over ±45° or thereabouts, information on pitot-tube response at very large yaw angles (>45°, say) is virtually non-existent, even though such information might be sometimes useful.

In this brief note is presented some exploratory measurements of pitot-tube response in a uniform stream at two particular yaw angles, namely 90° and 180°. While the 90° angle was chosen largely out of pure curiosity, the choice of 180° yaw has been motivated by some questions raised in a study on pressure-probe interference in a vortex flow. Included is a brief discussion of the effects of shear on the pitot-tube response.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 82 , Issue 812 , August 1978 , pp. 355 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bryer, D. W. and Pankhurst, R. C. The determination of windspeed and flow direction by pressure sensing instruments. NPL Aero Special Report 010, 1968.Google Scholar
2. Mojola, O. O. Measurements in a turbulent horseshoe vortex and the problem of probe interference. Imperial College Aero Report 73-08, December 1973.Google Scholar
3. Mojola, O. O. Pressure-probe interference in a vortex flow. (To be published.)Google Scholar
4. Bradshaw, P. Two more wind-tunnels driven by aerofoil-type centrifugal blowers. Imperial College Aero Report 72-10, April 1972.Google Scholar
5. Bradshaw, P. Aerodynamics equipment instruction manual. Imperial College Aero TN 73-105, September 1973.Google Scholar
6. Davies, P. O. A. L. The behaviour of a pitot-tube in transverse shear. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 3, pp 441–456, 1958.Google Scholar