Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:56:26.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pure bending of an I-section beam having initial curvature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. G. Antonaras
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, University of Ioannina, Greece
G. I. Tzivanidis
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, University of Ioannina, Greece

Extract

From the two ‘approximate’ theories of bending—Elementary Theory and Winkler available to designers for the determination of bending stresses in beams having initial curvature, the Winkler approximate solution is the one closer to the exact solution development by Golovin.

Timoshenko and Goodier show a comparison of stresses resulting from the three theories for a beam having rectangular cross-section. It is shown here that the values of bending stresses given by Winkler theory are very close to Golovin's exact results. The difference between the two theories lies in the range of 0·1–3·1 % increasing with the ratio, c/a, of the outer to inner radius of curvature of the beam. The above close relationship between the two theories for a beam of rectangular cross-section is also reported by Ford.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Winkler, E. Zivilingenieur, Vol 4, p 232, 1858.Google Scholar
2. Golovin, H. Trans Inst Tech, St Petersburg, 1881.Google Scholar
3. Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N. Theory of Elasticity (Third Edition), pp 7175, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2970.Google Scholar
4. Ford, H. Advanced mechanics of materials (First Edition), pp 257258, Longmans, London, 1963.Google Scholar
5. Holland, M. Pure bending of beams having initial curvature, The Aeronautical Journal, Vol 78, No 768, pp 570573, December 1974.Google Scholar
6. Seely, F. B. and Smith, J. O. Advanced mechanics of materials (Second edition), pp 33153, John Wiley, 1952.Google Scholar