Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:52:55.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent achievements in numerical simulation for aircraft power-plant configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

J. Reneaux ,
V. Brunet ,
S. Esquieu ,
M. Meunier  and
S. Mouton
J. Reneaux*
Affiliation:
Onera – The French Aerospace Lab, Meudon, France
V. Brunet
Affiliation:
Onera – The French Aerospace Lab, Meudon, France
S. Esquieu
Affiliation:
Onera – The French Aerospace Lab, Meudon, France
M. Meunier
Affiliation:
Onera – The French Aerospace Lab, Meudon, France
S. Mouton
Affiliation:
Onera – The French Aerospace Lab, Meudon, France
*
joel.reneaux@onera.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The engine/airframe integration design is one key differentiating factor for making efficient transport aircraft and this topic will become more important for future aircraft as the turbofan engine diameter is increased leading to a stronger engine-airframe interaction. Hopefully, the capabilities of advanced numerical simulations allow the involved complex phenomena to be taken into account and this is illustrated in this paper through several research studies: the use of the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations together with the drag extraction techniques to predict the drag, the simulation of unsteady complex interaction between the jet and the pylon with the zonal detached eddy simulation method, the pylon and nacelle design through multi disciplinary optimisation and the flow control technologies.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 117 , Issue 1188 , February 2013 , pp. 213 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cambier, L. and Veuillot, J.P. Status of the elsA software for flow simulation and multidisciplinary applications, 2008, AIAA2008-664, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, 7-10 January 2008, Reno, NV, USA.Google Scholar
2. Reneaux, J., Beaumier, P. and Girodroux-Lavigne, P. Advanced aerodynamic applications with the elsA software, Aerospace Lab, March 2011, 2.Google Scholar
3. Destarac, D. Far-field/near-field drag balance and applications of drag extraction in CFD, 2003, CFD-based Aircraft Drag Prediction and Reduction conference, 3-7 November 2003, Hampton, VA, USA.Google Scholar
4. Esquieu, S. Reliable drag extraction from numerical solutions: elimination of spurious drag, 2007, NATO Symposium AVT 147, 3-6 December 2007, Athènes, Greece.Google Scholar
5. Brodersen, O., Rakowitz, M., Amant, S., Larrieu, P., Destarac, D. and Sutcliffe, M. Airbus, Onera and DLR results from the 2nd AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop, 2004, 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, 5-8 January 2004, Reno, NV, USA.Google Scholar
6. Rossow, C.-C., Godard, J.-L., Hoheisel, H. and Schmitt, V. Investigations of propulsion integration interference effects on a transport aircraft configuration, 1992, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, 6-8 July 1992, Nashville, TN, USA.Google Scholar
7. Van der Vooren, J. and Destarac, D. Drag/thrust Analysis of jet-propelled transonic transport aircraft; definition of physical drag components, Aerospace Sci and Tech, September 2004, 8, (6), pp 545–556.Google Scholar
8. Drela, M. Power balance in aerodynamic flows, AIAA J, July 2009, 47, (7).Google Scholar
9. Brunet, V., Molton, P., Bézard, H. and Deck, S. Advanced experimental and numerical investigations of an aircraft powerplant configuration, 2010, AIAA2010-4814, 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
10. Deck, S. Numerical simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil, AIAA J, 2005, 43, (7), pp 1556–1566.Google Scholar
11. Raffel, M., Willert, C., Wereley, S. and Kompenhans, J. Particle Image Velocimetry: a Practical Guide, Springer Edition.Google Scholar
12. Brunet, V. Random flow generation technique for civil aircraft jet simulations with the ZDES approach, 2011, Fourth HRLM conference, 28-30 September 2011, Bejing, China.Google Scholar
13. Mouton, S., Lauranceau, J. and Carrier, G. Aerodynamic and structural optimisation of power-plant integration under a wing of a transport aircraft, 2007, 42ème Colloque d’Aérodynamique Appliquée AAAF, 19-21 March 2007, Sophia-Antipolis, France.Google Scholar
14. Reneaux, J. Overview on drag reduction technologies for civil transport aircraft, ECCOMAS 2004, Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
15. Flaig, A. Eco-efficient design challenges for aerodynamics engineers for future aircraft design, ECCOMAS 2008, July 2008, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
16. Cliquet, J., Houdeville, R. and Arnal, D. Application of laminar-turbulent transition criteria in Navier-Stokes computations, AIAA J, May 2008, 46, (5).Google Scholar
17. Bender, E.E., Anderson, B.H. and Yagle, P.J. Vortex generator modelling for Navier-Stokes codes, FEDSM 99-6919, July 1999.Google Scholar
18. Brunet, V., François, C., Garnier, E. and Pruvost, M. Experimental and numerical investigations of vortex generators effects, 2006, AIAA paper 2006-3027, Third AIAA Flow Control conference, 5-8 June 2006, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
19. Meunier, M. and Brunet, V. High-lift devices performance enhancement using mechanical and air-jet vortex generators. J Aircr, 2008, 45, (6), pp 2049–2061.Google Scholar