Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:37:58.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Riveted patch repairs for helicopter tail drive shafts with battle damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

J. Wang*
Affiliation:
Air Vehicles Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Australia
A. A. Baker
Affiliation:
Air Vehicles Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Australia Advanced Composite Structures Australia Pty, Fishermans Bend, Australia Co-operative Research Centre for Advanced Composite Structures, Fishermans Bend, Australia
D. Bitton
Affiliation:
Advanced Composite Structures Australia Pty, Fishermans Bend, Australia Co-operative Research Centre for Advanced Composite Structures, Fishermans Bend, Australia

Abstract

The ability to repair battle damage in a helicopter tail drive shaft (TDS) caused by small arms fire is a very important capability. A successful repair will enable the helicopter to continue its mission or at least allow it to return safely to base. This paper describes assessment of conventional and novel repair techniques using riveted metallic patches to restore the balance and strength of a damaged TDS. Analytical approaches are provided for the design of the repair. Modal analyses indicated that the effect of repair on change of the natural frequency of the TDS was negligible. An experimental testing program was conducted to validate the proposed repair methods. It has been demonstrated that the proposed repair methods achieved sufficient balance restoration by a defined repair procedure, assuming the unbalance could not be measured during a repair in the field. The conventional thin, single aluminium sheet, riveted repair significantly restored static strength. However, it only gave a fatigue life of 15hrs, and thus the repaired shaft may only be used for limited time for a military mission. The improved thick, two-half aluminium shell, riveted repair had sufficient static strength and met the 100-hour fatigue requirement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wang, J. and Baker, A.A. Aspects of battle damage repair of helicopter structures, Aeronaut J, 2010, 114, (1155), Royal Aeronautical Society, London, UK.Google Scholar
2. Li, H.C.H, Wang, J and Baker, A.A. Rapid composite bonded repair for helicopter tail shafts, Composites Part B, 2012, 43, pp 15791585.Google Scholar
3. House, T.L. Approaches to combat damage repair. AGARD Combat Damage Tolerance and Repair of Aircraft Structures, pp 110, AGARD Report 667, 1978.Google Scholar
4. Rao, J.S. and Dukkipati, R.V. Mechanism and machine theory, Wiley Eastern Limited. ISBN 81-224-0105, 1989.Google Scholar
5. Burdett Engineering Dynamic Balancing Pty Ltd, 36 Clarice Rd, Box Hill, Australia.Google Scholar
6. Stang, A.H., Ramberg, W. and Back, G. Torsion tests of tubes, NACA Report 601, 1937.Google Scholar
7. Metals Handbook, Vol.2. Properties and selection: Nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials, ASM International 10th ed, 1990.Google Scholar