Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:03:31.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roll control of a MALE UAV using the adaptive torsion wing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

R. M. Ajaj ,
M. I. Friswell ,
W. G. Dettmer ,
A. T. Isikveren  and
G. Allegri
R. M. Ajaj*
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
M. I. Friswell
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
W. G. Dettmer
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
A. T. Isikveren
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
G. Allegri
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
*
r.m.ajaj@swansea.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper assesses the feasibility of the Adaptive Torsion Wing (ATW) concept to replace conventional ailerons and enhance the manoeuvrability of a MALE UAV. The ATW concept is a thin-walled closed section two-spar wingbox whose torsional stiffness can be adjusted through the chord-wise position of the front and rear spar webs. The reduction in torsional stiffness allows external aerodynamic loads to induce aeroelastic twist that can be used as a function of the flight conditions to obtain a desired roll control authority. Modelling of the concept was performed using a conceptual design tool developed in MATLABTM. The variation of structural figures of merit are evaluated and discussed. Finally, an MDO study was performed to have in-depth assessments of the potential benefits of the ATW in replacing ailerons and providing sufficient roll control.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 117 , Issue 1189 , March 2013 , pp. 299 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Torenbeek, E. Development and Application of a Comprehensive, Design-sensitive Weight Prediction Method for Wing Structures of Transport Category Aircr. Delft University of Technology, Report LR-693, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Miller, G.D. Active Flexible Wing (AFW) Technology, Rockwell International North American Aircr Operations, 1988, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Report: AFWAL-TR-87-3096.Google Scholar
3. Clarke, R., Allen, M.J., Dibley, R.P., Gera, J. and Hodgkinson, J. Flight Test of the F/A-18 Active Aeroelastic Wing Airplane, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, 2005, San Francisco, CA, USA, AIAA 2005-6316.Google Scholar
4. Pendleton, E.W., Bessette, D., Field, P.B., Miller, G.D. and Griffin, K.E. Active aeroelastic wing flight research program: technical program and model analytical development, J Aircr, 2000, 37, (4), pp 554–561, doi: 10.2514/2.2654.Google Scholar
5. Griffin, K.E. and Hopkins, M.A. Smart stiffness for improved roll control, J Aircr, Engineering notes, 1997, 34, (3), pp 445–447.Google Scholar
6. Chen, P.C., Sarhaddi, D., Jha, R., Liu, D.D., Griffin, K. and Yurkovich, R. Variable stiffness spar approach for aircraft manoeuvre enhancement using ASTROS, J Aircr, September-October 2000, 37, (5).Google Scholar
7. Nam, C., Chen, P.C., Sarhaddi, D., Liu, D., Griffin, K. and Yurkovich, R. Torsion-Free Wing Concept for Aircraft Maneuver Enhancement, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, 2000, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, AIAA 2000-1620.Google Scholar
8. Florance, J.R., Heeg, J., Spain, C.V. and Lively, P.S. Variable Stiffness Spar Wind-Tunnel Modal Development azzzzzznd Testing, 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC/Structures, 2004, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, California, USA, AIAA 2004-1588.Google Scholar
9. Kuzmina, S., Amiryants, G., Schweiger, J., Cooper, J., Amprikidis, M. and Sensberg, O. Review and Outlook on Active and Passive Aeroelastic Design Concept for Future Aircraft, ICAS 2002 Congress, 8-13 September, Toronto, Canada, ICAS, 432, 2002, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
10. Schweiger, J. and Suleman, A. The European Research Project – Active Aeroelastic Structures, CEAS Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 2003.Google Scholar
11. Simpson, J., Anguita-Delgado, L., Kawieski, G., Nilsson, B., Vaccaro, V. and Kawiecki, G. Review of European Research Project Active Aeroelastic Aircraft Structures (3AS), European Conference for Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), 2005, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
12. Amprikidis, M., Cooper, J.E. and Sensburg, O. Development of an Adaptive Stiffness All-Moving Vertical Tail, 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Palm Spring, California, USA, 2004, AIAA 2004-1883.Google Scholar
13. Cooper, J.E., Amprikidis, M., Ameduri, S., Concilio, A., San Millan, J. and Castanon, M. Adaptive Stiffness Systems for an Active All-Moving Vertical Tail, European Conference for Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), 4-7th July 2005, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
14. Cooper, J.E. Adaptive stiffness structures for air vehicle drag reduction, In Multifunctional Structures/Integration of Sensors and Antennas (pp 15–1-15-12). Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-AVT-141, Paper 15.Nueuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO, 2006.Google Scholar
15. Cooper, J.E. Towards the Optimisation of Adaptive Aeroelastic Structures, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
16. Hodigere-Siddaramaiah, V. and Cooper, J.E. On the Use of Adaptive Internal Structures to Optimise Wing Aerodynamics Distribution, 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, 2006, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, AIAA 2006-2131.Google Scholar
17. Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I., Dettmer, W.G., Allegri, G. and Isikveren, A.T. Conceptual Modelling of an Adaptive Torsion Structure, 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, AIAA-2011-1883, 2011.Google Scholar
18. Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I., Dettmer, W.G., Allegri, G. and Isikveren, A.T. Roll Control of a U AV Using an Adaptive Torsion Structure, 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, AIAA-2011-1883, 2011.Google Scholar
19. Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I., Dettmer, W.G., Allegri, G. and Isikveren, A.T. 2012. Dynamic Modelling and Actuation of the Adaptive Torsion Wing, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, doi: 10.1177/1045389X12444493.Google Scholar
20. Melin, T. A Vortex Lattice MATLAB Implementation for Linear Aerodynamic Wing Applications. Master’s Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Department of Aeronautics, Sweden, 2000.Google Scholar
21. Melin, T. User’s guide and reference manual for Tornado, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Department of Aeronautics, Sweden, 2000.Google Scholar
22. Megson, T.H.G. Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students, New York: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003.Google Scholar
23. Wright, J.R. and Cooper, J.E. Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads, 11, Dynamic Aeroelasticity-Flutter, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.Google Scholar
24. Brunton, S.L. and Rowley, C.W. Low-dimensional State-Space Representations for Classical Unsteady Aerodynamic Models, 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2011, AIAA-2011-476.Google Scholar