No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 September 2016
When I was invited to deliver this lecture I proposed to deal with some aspects of Aeroplane Photographic Survey in which I have been especially interested, but in view of an event which happened on October 13, 1923, viz., the death of Major J. C. Griffiths in a flying accident at Coventry, I have felt that it is my duty to devote some part of this lecture to a consideration of the contributions made by my late friend to the advance of our knowledge of some of the fundamental features underlying the practice of aerial survey. For morethan three years, Griffiths, working under the direction of Prof. B. M. Jones, toiled at certain problems which were by no means easy to attack, which were absolutely of first-rate importance as a basis for certain types of survey work, and which when fully investigated provided results which had nothing spectacular about them, but which have laid a firm foundation for future work. Underconditions which were seldom easy and were frequently most discouraging, he worked unremittingly towards the solution of the problems which he was investigating, and has produced results which are of lasting worth.
Note on page 477 * Geographical Journal, Vol. LXI., p. 419, 1923.
Note on page 480 * Dominion of Canada. Report of the Air Board for 1922. Ottawa, 1923.
Note on page 480 † Transactions of the Surveyors’ Institution, Vol. IVI., p. 25, 1923.Google Scholar
Note on page 481 * Ibid., p. 58.
Note on page 482 * Ibid., p. 38.
Note on page 483 * Ibid., p. 71.
Note on page 483 * Ibid., p. 74.
Note on page 487 * See Beazeley, G. A., “Geographical Journal,” Vol. 53, p. 330, 1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Note on page 488 * Professional Paper No. 19. Survey of India, 1920.
Note on page 488 * Vide Aeronautical Journal, Vol. IX., 1905, p. 14.Google Scholar