Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:25:04.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spacing of Aircraft Under High Density Approach Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

E. A. Whiteley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The 850th Lecture to be given before the Royal Aeronautical Society was delivered at the Institution of Civil Engineers, Great George Street, London, S.W.1, on 20th March 1952. Major G. P. Bulman, C.B.E., F.R.Ae.S. (Past President) presided and introduced the Lecturer, Group Captain E. A. Whiteley, D.F.C., B.A., A.F.R.Ae.S., Royal Air Force, who was attending the Joint Services Staff College and who, in addition to being a pilot, had qualified as an R.A.F. Engineering and Navigation Specialist and also held a British Civil Airline Pilot's Transport Licence and a Flight Navigator's Licence.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 56 , Issue 500 , August 1952 , pp. 573 - 618
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bowen, E. G. and Piercey, T. (1948). Delays in the Flow of Air Traffic. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, April 1948.Google Scholar
2. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (Washington) Special Committees 41 and 52 (SC41 and SC52) (1949). Operational and Technical Characteristics of a Transition Period Air Traffic Control Communication System; Part II, Appendix III.Google Scholar
3. Ministry of Civil Aviation, U.K. (1949). Pamphlet MCAP 56.Google Scholar
4. Air Ministry, U.K. (1950). Air Ministry Order No. A289/50.Google Scholar
5. Research Branch R.A.F. Transport Command (1950). Flight tests of an Off-Schedule Speed Computer; paragraphs 35–40.Google Scholar
6. Reference document; has a military security classification.Google Scholar
7. Reference document; has a military security classification.Google Scholar
8. Research Branch R.A.F. Transport Command. Report No. 52 (classified as “Confidential”).Google Scholar
9. These studies by the U.S.A.F. All Weather Flying Division have not as yet been the subject of a published report.Google Scholar
10. Downes, J. G. (1950). An Aircraft Approach Procedure. Journ. Inst. of Navigation, U.K., Jan. 1950.Google Scholar
11. Lush, K. J. (1950). Note on the Time Required to Make Level Speed Measurements with a Turbine Jet Aircraft. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Oct. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Cummings, K. C. and Bulleymont, K. J. (1951). The Automatic Flight Schedule Controller. Proceedings Inst. Radio Engineers' Convention, Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A., 1951.Google Scholar
13. Merer, J. W. F. (1950). The Berlin Air Lift. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Aug. 1950.Google Scholar
14. Coulson, R. B. and Burgmann, V. D. (1951). An Investigation into Air Traffic Control by a Simulation Method. Journ. Inst, of Navigation, U.K., Jan. 1951.Google Scholar
15. Lyman, J. and Litchford, G. B. (1950). The Effect of Position Determination on Air Traffic Control. Supplement to Journ. Inst. of Navigation, U.S.A., Dec. 1950.Google Scholar
16. Ministry of Civil Aviation, U.K. (1946). London Airport, Report of Layout Panel, H.M.S.O. M.C.A.P. 4.Google Scholar
17. Transport Command Development Unit, R.A.F. (1946). Final Report on Australian Multi-track Radar Range.Google Scholar
18. British European Airways (1948). Report on Initial Flight Tests with Gee Mark III, Report No. 5—Accuracy. Ministry of Supply, London, Oct. 1948.Google Scholar
19. Summary Report on Evaluation of Omni-Bearing-Distance System of Air Navigation (1950). Rambo, W. R., Prichard, J. S., Duffy, D. P. and Wheeler, R. C.. Report No. 540-1. Airborne Instruments Laboratory, Mineola, New York, U.S.A., Oct. 1950.Google Scholar
20. Williams, Caradoc (1948). Fundamental Considerations affecting Air Traffic Control Methods. Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough. Tech. Note No. RAD 421.Google Scholar
21. Ayers, R. H. (1949). The Aerodrome Problem Related to Aircraft Design and Operation. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Sept. 1949.Google Scholar
22. Hart, C. A. (1950). Air Survey. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Oct. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Aiken, W. S. (1946). Tables and Charts for Use in Calculation of Airspeeds. N.A.C.A. Technical Note No. 1120.Google Scholar
24. Bowen, E. G. (1951). The Navigational Work of the C.S.I.R.O., Australia. Journ. Inst. of Navigation, U.K., Oct. 1951.Google Scholar
25. The Airport and its Neighbors (1952). Report of the President's Airport Commission. U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1952.Google Scholar