Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:03:24.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Fatigue and Other Airworthiness Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. K. Williams
J. K. Williams*
Affiliation:
Air Registration Board
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper the emphasis is on safety problems connected with the use of light fixed-wing aircraft for agricultural purposes. Most of the aircraft concerned are between 2000 and 6000 lb all-up weight and are single piston-engined types. About 97 per cent of all hours flown in agricultural aviation all over the world are by such small fixed-wing aircraft, the remainder by larger aircraft such as the DC-3 and helicopters.

The mass of statistics available on this type of flying is therefore confined to the small fixed-wing aircraft and since this type is obviously the most important with respect to this activity, then it is appropriate to concentrate on this type.

Type
Requirements for Agricultural Aircraft – Pilot's Viewpoint and Engineering Aspects
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 67 , Issue 636 , December 1963 , pp. 776 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Statistical Review. General Aviation Accidents. Issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board, Bureau of Safety, U.S.A., 1959.Google Scholar
2.Accidents in Aerial Application Activities. Issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board, Bureau of Safety, U.S.A., 1959.Google Scholar
3.Aerial Agriculture. Issued by the Department of Civil Aviation, Australia, January 1958.Google Scholar
4.Civil Aviation Information Circular No. 84/1962. Issued by the Ministry of Aviation, 17th October 1962.Google Scholar
5.Development of Crash-Survival Design in Personal, Executive and Agricultural Aircraft, by Hugh De Haven. Issued by Crash Injury Research, Cornell University Medical College, New York, May 1953.Google Scholar
6.Crash Survival Study of a Survivable Accident Involving a iper PA-11, by A. Howard Hasbrook. General Aircraft: Release 1-16. Issued by Aviation Crash Injury Research, CornelMjuggenheim Aviation Safety Center, New York, May 1954.Google Scholar
7.Unpublished work covered by Ministry of Aviation Contract 1961.Google Scholar
8.Vertical Accelerations Encountered by Aircraft on Agricultural Operations, by R. T. Sewell, National Aeronautical Eastablishment, Canada. Aeronautical Report LR-304, April 1961.Google Scholar
9.Preliminary Note on Flight Loads on Cessna and Beaver Aircraft on Agricultural Operations, by F. H. Hooke and S. R. Perry. Aeronautical Research Laboratories S.M. Technical Memorandum 107, Australia, November 1961.Google Scholar
10.Counting Accelerometer Records from a Dove Aircraft Operating in Western Australia, by I. S. Milligan, Department of Civil Aviation, Australia, Report SM-17.Google Scholar
11.Royal Aeronautical Society Data Sheets—Fatigue.Google Scholar