Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:55:13.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Subjective Basis for Aircraft Noise Limitation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. W. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Acoustics Section, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington

Extract

A brief review is given of the kinds of objective and subjective measurement required for systematic regulation of the aircraft noise around an airport, based on a maximum permissible noise exposure criterion. Some subjective factors are discussed and illustrated by test results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A paper given at an International Conference on the Reduction of Noise and Disturbance Caused by Civil Aircraft, held in London in November 1966. Received 11th February 1967.

References

1.Land Use Planning with, Respect to Aircraft Noise. Air R Manual, 86-5, Army Tech Manual. 5-365, Navy Manual P-98. FAA, Washington, DC, October 1964.Google Scholar
2.Kryter, K. D. and Pearsons, K. S.J Acoust Soc Amer, Vol 36, p 394, 1964.Google Scholar
3.Precision Sound Level Meters. IEC Publication 179. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 1965.Google Scholar
4.Procedure for Describing Aircraft Noise around an Air port. ISO Recommendation R507. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1966.Google Scholar
5.Noise. Final Report of the Wilson Committee on the Problem of Noise. HMSO, London, 1963. See Appendix XLGoogle Scholar
6.van Os, G. J. and van steenbrugge, B. Paper F.38 5th International Congress on Acoustics, Liège, Sept 1965.Google Scholar
7.Fluglärm. Report to the Federal German Ministry of Health by W. Bürck, Grützmacher, M., Meister, F. J., Müller, E. A. and Matschat, K.. Göttingen, May 1965.Google Scholar
8.Bowsher, J. M. and Robinson, D. W.Brit J Appl Phys, Vol 13, p 179, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.For a general account see Lehmann, G.Arbeitsgemein-schaft für Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfaletl, Vol 94, p 7. Westdeutscher-Verlag, Cologne.Google Scholar
10.Kryter, K. D.J Acoust Soc Amer, Vol 31, p 1415, 1959.Google Scholar
11.Kryter, K. D. and Pearsons, K. S.J Acoust Soc Amer, Vol 35, p 886, 1963.Google Scholar
12.Copeland, W. C, Davidson, I. M., Hargest, T. J. and Robinson, D. W.JRAeS, Vol 64, p 33, 1960.Google Scholar
13.Robinson, D. W. and Bowsher, J. M.Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 65, p 635, 1961.Google Scholar
14.Little, J. W.Noise Control, Vol 7, p 11, 1961.Google Scholar
15.Kryter, K. D. and Pearsons, K. S.J. Acoust Soc Amer, Vol 38, p 106, 1965. See also ref. 11.Google Scholar
16.National Physical Laboratory (unpublished report).Google Scholar
17.Mckennell, A. C. Social Survey Report SS 337. Central Office of Information, London, April 1963. Appendix B.Google Scholar
18.Perret, E., Grandjean, E. and Lauber, A.Le Travail Humain, Vol 27, p 53, 1964.Google Scholar
19.Hilton, D. A., Huckel, V., Steiner, R. and Maglieri, D. J. NASA Technical Note D-2539, Washington, DC, September 1965. See also Borsky, P. N. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories Report TR-65-37, April 1965.Google Scholar
20.Bürck, W.Rohde und Schwarz-Mitteilungen, No 19, p 199,1965.Google Scholar
21.Robinson, D. W., Copeland, W. C. and Rennie, A. J.The Engineer, Vol 211, p 493, 1961.Google Scholar
22.Mills, C. H. G. and Robinson, D. W.The Engineer, Vol 211, p 1070, 1961. See also ref. 5, Appendix IX.Google Scholar
23.Robinson, D. W., Bowsher, J. M. and Copeland, W. C.Acustica, Vol 13, p 324, 1963. See alsoref. 5, App X.Google Scholar
24.Bowsher, J. M., Johnson, D. R. and Robinson, D. W.Acustica, Vol 17, p 245, 1966.Google Scholar
25.Bishop, D. E.J. Acoust,Soc Amer, Vol 40, p 108, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar